REMEMBER THE 100 GORILLION KILLED BY CARL MARCKS
REMEMBER THE 100 GORILLION KILLED BY CARL MARCKS
How many people have been murdered in the name of liberal democracy?
BASED LEFTY/POL/ POSTERS!!!!!
what ideology has had the least deaths?
feudalism?
mgtow
Radical Jainism.
Zoroastrian fundamentalism
Authoritarian pragmatism
my big bavarian cock
Marx was a consummate bullshit artist whose ideas were all based on the completely discredited labour theory of value. The only thing he ever left of worth was a case study on how otherwise intelligent people can somehow be made to believe in utter dreck
Techno-utopianism
Ofc it had to be the mutts
But mutts are commies
The fuck are you on
The incel rebellion
Well, what would you expect of los estados de gobelinos?
>implying most lard lefties and righties screeching are not mutts
what do you mean by this post
He went to install gentoo to your daughter calls me gentoo too
>celebrating a freemason
Feudalism killed far more than communisn by extreme poverty, starvation and religious wars.
What all "but there were 3 famines!" people don't tell you is that in feudal preindustrial society, regional famines are happening yearly.
yeah but wasn't there also a smaller population to kill
I guess percentage wise feudalism killed more
but peasants are too dumb and short-lived to realize the depths of their suffering
famines and plagues are forces of nature
and the church abuses the feudal lords just as much as it abuses the peasants
it's not like you can say no to the pope when he calls for a religious war
> the church abuses the feudal lords just as much as it abuses the peasants
Not nearly as much. Feudal lords still had the judicial and executive power in their lands, which were separate from church lands. Peasants weren't even allowed to leave their lords' lands.
> it's not like you can say no to the pope when he calls for a religious war
Crusades were fought by volunteers, most of them were called and led by a powerful lord (king of France, king of Hungary, German emperor), it's not like the Pope had the power to force a king to start a war on the other side of the sea.
Also, most events that killed millions of people happened in Feudal China.
Why does everybody hate freemason?
They are objectivly the good guys
Are you an American false flagging as a German?
then explain what did they do right?
enlightenment
Marx wrote a book containing very good points.
alri lad
based capitalists
wtf I live in an enlightened society now
Egoism
*several books
And a few pamphlets
stoicism and the swiss neutral policy.
because they think
Freemason -> secret organisation that runs the world -> all the billionaire CEOs -> Jews -> Zionism -> ritualistic orgies with paedophilia and cannibalism -> "i could be someone, i could have lead humanity into space, but jews through control of media and governments have led this world into degenerate state of feelings/ignorance/stupidity > truth/enlightenment/ambition, so now i spent all my time on chinese cartoon forum masturbating to shota traps. damn jews, hitler did nothing wrong."
Ancap, because there has not been any place with it, Kowloon maybe good contender.
Pretty accurate rundown, Polish bro, what always baffles me is that these people usually don't stop and marvel at the inherent paradox of the "secret organisation that runs the world" step.
Like, bitch, if every one knows they rule the world how is that secret ? Rich, influential and powerful people rule the world, woo-hoo big news, huge discovery, call the press !
Seriously, Freemasons are nothing more than the LinkedIn of the top 1%, they don't rule the world because they're freemasons, they're freemasons because they rule the world.
Classical liberalism (i.e. libertarianism), it is also the most rational and free ideology.
I guess that Belgian Congo is pretty accurate approximation of how ancap would look like outside internet
Traditional Tribalism
I love political charts.
And I thought EU becoming more and more like USSR was just a meme
Check out "Late Victorian Holocausts"
It shows how laissez-faire ideology managed to kill milions of people in India
>if every one knows
most people don't
>Freemasons are nothing more than the LinkedIn of the top 1%
yes, the claim that they are just a club for larping old men are everywhere, but people shouldn't forget that they _are_ occultists
>most people don't
Are you telling me most people don't know rich & influential people rule the world ? Come on, user.
> they _are_ occultists
Who gives a shit, they have their rituals just like eveyr other spiritual person on Earth.
>they have their rituals just like eveyr other spiritual person on Earth.
that's a lie
How do you know that ?
Never forget the 100 quinjilion!
IQ: 67
Incelism although they're just starting
Based marx
Who doesn’t?
Do you really believe in fucking magic?
Now though was it actually Marx's Ideology that killed this many people or was it the way the dictators tried to implement and upkeep it?
That doesn't matter.
Unironically the best political chart I ever saw.
but it wasn't REAL communism!
why are americans so mad about karl marx? he was a very important person in the history of europe and there's nothing wrong with doing celebrations
Beautiful.
Wanted to post this:
europe.easybranches.com
To their credit, we are not much better in this regard.
I hope do hope EU collapses soon
Fuck these communists
>There is only one way in which the murderous death agonies of the old society and the bloody birth throes of the new society can be shortened, simpliefied and concentrated, and that way is revolutionary terror
kill yourself
Enjoy being even poorer, more irrelevant and at Putin's mercy when that happens (not that we won't).
the left says the EU is too right wing capitalist and the right says it's too left wing socialist
Libertarianism can't have deaths if the NAP is properly followed
>establish near-complete monopsony on the territory
>state company dictates the territory's trade and (naturally) sets up protectionist policies for itself
>taxes on farmers' output can go as high as 30%
Why do people keep conflating colonialism with laissez-faire? They both suck but they are completely different approaches to markets.
>swiss neutral policy
t. revisionist propagandist
Sounds out of context.
Who juche gang here?
100 GORILLION
010 NGORILLIO
001 ONGORILLI
100 IONGORILL
010 LIONGORIL
001 LLIONGORI
100 ILLIONGOR
010 RILLIONGO
001 ORILLIONG
100 GORILLION
There's one solution. One that combines a national focus and a left look on economy :^)