Why is this wet rag communist still in charge?
Why is this wet rag communist still in charge?
Other urls found in this thread:
Reminder that this guy will be in charge after he leaves.
Who is this?
>eu
>communist
i wish but choose one and only one
Have a look at what he said about Castro and how eagerly he went to unveil Marx's statue in Trier
What did he say about Castro, Castro is based. Also Marx was an important man in economical and social history of world, nothing wrong with respecting him. Unfortunately doesn't change the fact that EU is a neoliberal capitalist shitshow.
>unironically liking Castro and Marx
>still being asshurt about eu
Keep those tears coming.
Oh, don't you worry, that shitshow is going to collapse. But it would be better if it were sooner than later.
If anything it's a shitty mishmash of both.
Open borders to keep wages low, anti-worker trade deals, giant welfare state for rapefugees to leech off, retarded regulation, gibs for poor membercunts + loansharking to Greece, authoritarian controls (muh hate speech, bin that knife), unelected officials/bureaucrats, 100s (1000s?) of whom are paid more than Theresa May.
Ancapistan Europe with protected borders would be perfect therefore I attack for it's communism.
important =/= good
Marx died 40 years before the Russian revolution and wrote books about how the distribution of wealth could be improved.
His thesis are a continuation of work by Adams and after Marx ppl like Ricardo etc. continued his work. It's how social sciences work. Nothing wrong with respecting Marx just as there's nothing wrong with respecting Adams.
Communist leaders like to stick around for a while :DD
Kill all workers: the politician.
this
His economics were proven false (zero-sum game, the poor will increase, millionaires ( or 10'000aires in his time) will become fewer; the most advanced economies will inevitably transition to communism) and he advocated for violent revolution and terror.
Not to mention he was a cunt in his personal life too.
>how the distribution of wealth could be improved
That's a nice euphemism for blatant robbery
Except he was proven wrong so many times it's not even funny.
>blatant robbery
I want you to move to Amsterdam and try to get a house there and tell me there isn’t a big flaw in our economic system
>he advocated for violent revolution and terror.
Nothing wrong with advocating revolution in authoritarian societies where workers were being oppressed.
>Except he was proven wrong so many times it's not even funny.
Some of it were, some of it were not. Like things about creative destruction were from Marx's thesis. He's a social scientist and should be celebrated as one.
it made more sense in industrial Britain where he lived where the workers were legitimately being fucked in the arse. Unions have accually done a lot to fix that without communism.
He was just some random guy who wrote about how he thought the world was, some shit was interesting like looking at things through class.
this
Why would I move to Amsterdam when i know moving there is going to be costly and I won't be able to get a house?
>should be celebrated
He really shouldn't considering what trying to put his wrong ideas into practise has brought into the world
based and redpilled
Why is this commie man even in charge for so long?
Who elected him? I didn't.
>He really shouldn't considering what trying to put his wrong ideas into practise has brought into the world
What things like workes rights? 8 hour day? Two day weekend? Being allowed to unionize without capitalists murdering workers?. Child labour laws? Etc. etc.
Ah yes, because THAT is how economic policy is enforced.
Finally, the Europeans have accepted communism
I am proud of you
Go back to Jow Forums you fucking stupid, pig-ignorant teenager.
Like dispossesing capitalists, proletarian dictatorship and encouragement of violent revolution
If it quacks like a duck...
Based fin.
>Like dispossesing capitalists, proletarian dictatorship and encouragement of violent revolution
Like I said, nothing wrong with those things if you live in an authoritarian society where there's no worker's rights.
>If it quacks like a duck...
Tell me right fucking now how one man having an opinion of a famous historical figure and a statue of him is in any way a means of systematically enforcing economic and social policies across Europe.
>dispossesing capitalists, proletarian dictatorship and encouragement of violent revolution
Not him, but whats the problem here?
Violent revolution is the only reason we got rid of feudalism and monarchies
>Like dispossesing capitalists, proletarian dictatorship and encouragement of violent revolution
Nothing wrong with these
>be czech
>free yourself from the grasps of communism that have put you 50 years behind the rest of europe
>being free is scary, immediately join EUSSR so you can have a big man far away telling you what to do
>nothing wrong with those things
How much does it cost to rent a helicopter in Finland/France?
It's telling of the mindset he comes from.
>being free is scary
No, being poor is scary and joining a free trade area is a smart thing to do.
>le helicopter meme
Based and redpilled my fellow magapede
Does anyone actually find helicopter memes funny anymore?
Give us a quick rundown on his likely replacement(s) please
Violent commie revolutionaries don't deserve anything else.
It's basically just a statement that the discussion is over, if you support violent commie revolution even though there is ample evidence it doesn't work and only makes things worse, there really is nothing left to say.
your brain on capitalism:
>overthrowing authoritarian regime that oppresses workers
bad
>throwing some peaceful soiboi leftist college students from helicopter
good
Whats the difference between commie revolutionaries and liberal revolutionaries?
Revolutions bad ok?
>liberal revolutionaries
Like?
your brain on communism:
>some people living like shit while most of the others have it good to okay
bad
>killing people who know what they are doing and anyone smart enough to realize that self-interest can't be denied to plunge the country into more or less equal poverty
good
>Like?
Not him, but American revolutionary war, French revolution?
>>liberal revolutionaries
>Like?
Like the French Revolution?? What kind of question is that
>French revolution
Downright bad. Lots of guillotine and pointless slaughter only to have the country united under one manlet in the end.
>American revolution
Okayish. The founding fathers atleast knew what they were doing when they wrote the constitution.
>Lots of guillotine and pointless slaughter
“THERE were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror—that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.” -Mark Twain
Works for other revolutions too.
I hate how people use French revolution as some fucking great example.
France fell into anarchy after the fucking revolution, innocent people were killed en masse, the famine still wasn't fixed, the peasants living conditions were still the same.
And then Napoleon came along.
Fucking idiots
>lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break
Which the French revolution did nothing to change
>the other had lasted a thousand years.
No human will suffer but momentary terror.
Life is suffering, no revolution will change that, you'll just fill the streets with more coffins and leave another scar.
Idiot.
Meh, having most the world are their throats from the moment the revolution started didn't help for sure. Should've also gone full on jacobin, shame about Robespierre.
>Life is suffering, no revolution will change that
thread dindt go as you expected and now you are having an autistic fit because people dont share your views
if you wanted your dick sucked so bad should have posted in >>Jow Forums
>communist
?
He might be too left leaning for my tastes, but wasn't he arguing for Europe preserving local cultures and all that? Also, the EU is capitalist af.
Stop. Please stop, you're not helping.
That's because you were underage when the elections were taking place.
>frogposter
Probably still are.
What he said about Castro is just straight up factual. You don't have to be a communist to acknowledge it, just look at Nelson Mandela.
> how eagerly he went to unveil Marx's statue in Trier
I don't get it. That makes him a communist? I know I'd be pretty happy if I'd been asked to unveil a statue.
>eu
>not communist
i hope it's a bait
wait, eu is good so.... is communism good too? mind freaking blown. youtube.com
shadilay MAGA
What do people have against Juncker?
Seems like baseless hysteria against him, he's an alright chap.
>im asspained about historical figures
Lel
keep up the good work OP
Marx is and remains the most influential philosopher of the modern age. Even his critics are playing in his ideological paradigm.
Juncker is a centre-right Christian democrat. Nothing communist about him.
It’s just that for Eastern Europeans used to robber baron capitalism, everyone not for a complete dismantlement of the Western European welfare state is a leftist radical.
>wait, eu is good so....
"No!", you mentally ill communist Finn.