Why are Americans getting increasingly hysterical and neurotic on social media?
Why are Americans getting increasingly hysterical and neurotic on social media?
What's intriguing is that Bannon holds the same viewpoint, and was kicked out of the security council for similar objections, but still won't turn against Trump
thats what social networks were made for: collection private data and make ppl neurotic
why don't neo-nazi white people just make more money than the jews and simply outbid them
>Iran deal cancelled
meaning Iran is nuking up and the kikes are shitting their pants. The holohoax days are just to keep the jews placated.
because aryanness > money in the world
and they don't want to admit that jews have procured more influence through cunning or intelligence
First part is true
Second part is false, plenty of people admit that
that faggot kike/ Sionist juice ass licker OP makes another kike ass kissing competition thread
I hope you die OP, a horrible death
Why aryanness though, there's a feeling of might makes right here that makes it a bit hypocritical
I am objecting to your right to an ethnically homogenous society, I am saying the colonial powers didn't subjugate only to 'bring civilization' but because their superior technology ensured they can procure more resources, much like jews with high financial or intellectual success
Jow Forums and Jow Forumsfags are cancer
I am not objecting to*
Dont see your point desu. Because whypepol subjugated others itd be hypocritical not to be subjugated by jews?
In the end colonialism wasnt worth it, not because of the low profit, but because it was a first step to globalisation
The main advocates of ethnostates point out 'inherent racial differences' right, that biology itself should define your right to create a society based on Europeans?
If Jews managed to subvert that biological premise and dominate, why isn't it a consequence of biology? Is it cheating in the same way non-whites claim you, who dominated them, cheated?
Don't take it personally and consider it prerogative for mass non-white immigration, one thing that fascinates me is how multiple white ethnicities today were essentially the same scuttlebutt of the some communities under the guise of classism
Same reason for why black people don't just make more many then the whites and simply outbid them
>If Jews managed to subvert that biological premise and dominate, why isn't it a consequence of biology? Is it cheating in the same way non-whites claim you, who dominated them, cheated?
In an evolutionary strategy probably. Some creatures are preditors others parasites but who in their right mind willingly accepts parasitism?
>one thing that fascinates me is how multiple white ethnicities today were essentially the same scuttlebutt of the some communities under the guise of classism
Like how irishmen were likened to white negros say? There was one group of irishmen that didnt have to face that kind of treatment, namely the ones that lived in ireland
>Some creatures are preditors others parasites but who in their right mind willingly accepts parasitism?
So the host in this scenario is the ethnic body? And legally defined success (in spite of any opposition to the validity of the legislation that enables it) is automatically parasitism from an ethnic standpoint?
And predation means enforcement of your will in a war scenario is better than something you consider subversion or cheating? American corporate success is based on the latter and people voted for their current president citing his ability to outmaneuvre tax legislation.
I think you want to justify the means through some moral idea domination but can't concede the same to say Jews or Asians.
>There was one group of irishmen that didnt have to face that kind of treatment, namely the ones that lived in ireland
It doesn't matter if they suddenly quit immigration. People with your same honorable beliefs about 'evolutionary predation' might one day find themselves out of resources and needing to invade that ireland for the benefit of who they believe to be superior.
>And legally defined success (in spite of any opposition to the validity of the legislation that enables it) is automatically parasitism from an ethnic standpoint?
No, lobbying and producing media gloryifying what detracts from the society they inhabit in order to weaken any nationalism is what makes them parasites
Neither predation or parasitism is moral but its a dog-eat-dog world
>le asians
Who cares about them?
>People with your same honorable beliefs about 'evolutionary predation' might one day find themselves out of resources and needing to invade that ireland for the benefit of who they believe to be superior.
Funny you should say "people with my beliefs" because if anyone will be invading anything for resources in the future it will be your people. Africa is exploding in population and of the people cant find a future in an overcrowded slum they will invade anywhere prosperous and absolutely no one will think of any pretentious moral belief of their actions
>meaning Iran is nuking up and the kikes are shitting their pants.
Because when they ordered Trump to cancel it through Kushner, they also expected immediately attacks on Iran, which the US didn't do.
It didn't go all according to plan.
>No, lobbying and producing media gloryifying what detracts from the society they inhabit in
I find this laughable because an immense number of whites benefit from the same policies, white politicians take them on for the same purpose, but it betrays the ideal of ethnonationalism and makes you feel incapable of employing the state in your goal, so its naturally dismissable
>Neither predation or parasitism is moral but its a dog-eat-dog world
No morals besides my personal and ethnic profit? Sounds like African tribalism
>because if anyone will be invading anything for resources in the future it will be your people
Sorry about that. But if we did it under the guise of a nation like Russia invading Finland it would be a glorious reaffirmation of our right to do so? I don't support it but what you want to say is that if a white/Asian nation invades Finland ethnocentrism is moot, otherwise essential
Hard to make money when even McDonalds won't accept your 7th grade drop out ass with a swastika tattooed on your forehead.
>I find this laughable because an immense number of whites benefit from the same policies, white politicians take them on for the same purpose, but it betrays the ideal of ethnonationalism and makes you feel incapable of employing the state in your goal, so its naturally dismissable
Just because cars naturally get rusty that doesnt mean you should park yours in seawater :^)
>No morals besides my personal and ethnic profit? Sounds like African tribalism
There can be morals where they can be afforded but whoever gives up on tribalism gives up on being
>Sorry about that. But if we did it under the guise of a nation like Russia invading Finland it would be a glorious reaffirmation of our right to do so? I don't support it but what you want to say is that if a white/Asian nation invades Finland ethnocentrism is moot, otherwise essential
Yes, it would be infinitely more respectful to just declare war rather than overburden a country with immigration until it breaks apart like the western roman empire
>Just because cars naturally get rusty that doesnt mean you should park yours in seawater :^)
Willingness to cede moral standards (and criminal ones) based on ethnic solidarity, shitheads do this here
>There can be morals where they can be afforded but whoever gives up on tribalism gives up on being
Selective application of morals based on ethnic/tribal origins is what a lot of people here decry about Africa, Sudan esp.
>Yes, it would be infinitely more respectful to just declare war rather than overburden a country with immigration until it breaks apart like the western roman empire
I guess Germany really had a good point with lebensraum. That tribalism governs your worldview, and Africans to me makes greatful for nuclear deterrence
Manipulation by social media platforms and clickbait journalism. It's happening everywhere in the west, but most visible here.
>Willingness to cede moral standards (and criminal ones) based on ethnic solidarity, shitheads do this here
Its not ceding, just cause crime will never cease doesnt mean some are more guilty than other of it and therefore more of a burden to society. It would be like saying Japan and El salvador are just as bad because murders occur in both. Of course some whites lobby politicians for the worst legislation and they should not be allowed to do so but its not to the same level.
>Selective application of morals based on ethnic/tribal origins is what a lot of people here decry about Africa, Sudan esp.
I dont know if it could be done, but expanding the tribe to the entire country like Finns are Finns instead of Karelians and Savonians would avert most of this problem, but I guess Sudan is too diverse for that.
Sorry for an insinuating remarks, but Sudan is basically everything we discussed x1000 worse, I hope you can understand the skepticism
Working on McDonald's isn't how you make money money than the jews. You need to start your own business empire to do that.
I guess I can but tribalism sure seems inevitable, because pretty much the only ones who have it here are immigrants and they are ever growing
that's your example? people obsessed with the russia conspiracy are possibly experiencing actual insanity at this point
Always interesting the cognitive dissonance in this type of sentiment. Jews rule the world but are also somehow beneath you. They are stupid and mischevious but also cunning and witty. Truly incomprehensible