Roger Ver Hate General

Is Ver the evilest man in crypto? He created BCash just so he could start over from cheap coins while ruining for all the honest speculators who aren't part of his P&D.

Attached: 1514116505378.jpg (618x434, 25K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=X4d_29vJlB4
twitter.com/AnonBabble

O B S E S S E D

bch stands for bitch cash

Is VB in a cahoot with Ver?

Attached: ybr3h5o792s01.jpg (1200x1198, 131K)

>evilest man in crypto
Evil?
No one helped to promote Bitcoin more than him.

Coinbase gave me free Bcash, I sold that piece of crap for OMG

And I don't really see how making a website about Bitcoin in 2010 or whenever qualifies this guy as some crypto authority figure

Ver didn't create BCH. BCH came about because core refused to allow the blocks to grow and there was enough of a market demand for a fork that had no segwit and an unrestrained block size. Someone just took the bitcoin software and modified it and created something called Bitcoin ABC. Some miners and exchanges went along with it and it got traction.

If you really want to blame someone for creating BCH... blame Core.

Roger was a late coming to BCH, after Segwitx2 failure you clown

The most evil person involved in Bitcoin is Theymos, the moderator who censors anyone who disagrees with his agenda.

Forking the alpha coin that literally has rules in place to ensure consensus is never a good thing. That said, it did expose the flaw in the governance model by demonstrating how much power miners have.

Bcash was a step backwards, but it's all part of the organic evolution of Bitcoin. Just another problem for the community to solve. Who knows, maybe solving this will be the answer to the biggest centralization threat which will be globalist nation states.

>lies
bitch trash came out because segwit ruined the shitstain asicboost 30% mining attack.

they are trying to do the same thing with Monero because of the hard fork ruined their cryptonight asic attack. They are calling it Monero Classic baka

Can someone who supports BCH please tell me why it is Ver and Wu decided to hard fork Bitcoin to create Bitcoin Cash, when LTC existed which is literally a copy paste of bitcoins source code with all the bullshit BCH supporters love to tout BCH has over bitcoin. The ONLY conclusion I can come to is they wanted to control the name Bitcoin and that is it, a.k.a greed. Which defeats Vers whole argument about needing bitcoin to be "electronic cash", propaganda, and censorship.

Attached: 1512320021647.png (432x643, 350K)

have you heard of asicboost? it is the sole reason bitmain is behind bch.

wow you sound scared

Overt asic boost is okay by blockstream. Just not covert. Kek

he supported btc for years
do you hate btc?

This is why Roger Ver forked Bcash:
Roger Ver is an entrepreneur/business man w/e
He wants to be in charge, he has something in his mind and wants to go with that. He doesn't want to debate teams on how to do it, he just wants to take the project and run with it.

Thats why he's incompatible with BTC because he can't just take it and run with it unlike with his fork BCH.

Will he succeed probably? will BTC fail? Probably not.

I want to thank Roger for the forked BCH. Immediatelly traded it into LTC.

So they can 10x their btc stack

explain yourself faggot. How the actual does blockstream (not a mining company) utilize a defunct algo exploit overtly?

inb4 >muh some other thing that isn't asicboost

Dumbest trade in history

Bitcoin Cash wouldn't have gotten anywhere without market support. There is market demand for a version of bitcoin with larger blocks and without segwit. It's not just 'evil miners' supporting it. Miners are going to invest in what they believe will actually be useable and profitable in the future. A lot of people want Bitcoin to be fast, cheap, global currency for the world, and think scaling on chain is the way to go.

You can get all conspiratorial if you want, but someone could say the same about BTC and Core/Blockstream...

Segshit is absolute garbage. Not interested in block subsidies.

LTC is not committed to the kind of scaling that BCH is, and they use segwit, which creates a different type of network structure and changes certain incentives. They simply have different visions. BCH is the "we want terabyte sized blocks" cryptocurrency. AFAIK Litecoin has no intention of scaling on-chain to that order of magnitude.

Also, Litecoin is a fork of BTC but it isn't a fork of the blockchain itself. BCH shares the same genesis block and history of BTC up until August 1st 2017

youtube.com/watch?v=X4d_29vJlB4

lol so much to hate

0conf instant payments and unlimited bandwidth/blocksize that gives us nearly free transactions without congestion forever

Upcoming smart contracts, colored coins (like erc20), anonymizing coin mixers are nice bonuses

Also its not controlled by people who are literally funded by jewish wall street bankers and bilderberg members, unlike btc with blockstream

He doesn't control BCH, he has no executive or other role what so ever.

Exactly. Glad someone realizes segwit changes the incentive model and the scaling at larger block sizes... segwit is not necessarily a good idea. For a number of reasons. Google criticisms of segwit and see what I mean...

You talk like a fucking sjw, if you hate him so much go crash his coin. God wtf is this place, Ain't nothing like I heard or seen, just fucking pathetic virgins and larping faggots

I'll humor you:
1. Big blockers are sick of blockstream's control over bitcoin's scaling direction and censorship for the benefit of their own business interests.
2. Charlie Lee is a blockstream cuck
3. Cucks follow their masters lead so moving over to LTC would be going nowhere. (eg. LTC segwit)

Don't reply to that bait, it's top of the list on Blockstream's pajeet propaganda machine

>market demand
>crypto
AHAHAH

I like to quote this guy when asked what the bitcoin cash fork is...


>a type of psychological experiment to see if people as a group could be tricked into ascribing value to something created from nothing, if they were given it as a gift.

not only giving garbage actual value but, to pledge some kind of crypto allegiance to the shitfork too.

> bcashies get insulted when you call their shitcoin fork bcash
> refuse to accept the term bcash is reference to Bitcoin Cash.
lmfaoooooo bcashies are deluded af.

Attached: bcash.jpg (1280x720, 79K)

>Ywn get congratulated on something seriously by vitalik buterin