Why do Americans feel they *need* to own a tactical strategic assault weapon?

Why do Americans feel they *need* to own a tactical strategic assault weapon?

Attached: Assault_Weapon.jpg (591x294, 73K)

The founding fathers wanted me to have an AR-15

I think it's due the helthy tradition of mistrust the government and tyrannicide if it's necessary

>tactical strategic assault weapon

>tactical strategic assault weapon
the state of britbongs

Woo guns!

Attached: IMG_4919.jpg (1600x1200, 1.68M)

Lamo at all the newcunts not ever seeing this pasta

>tactical strategic assault weapon
can't make this up

SHALL

Have you ever shot one? They are SO much fun.

They border a country where gangs have literally taken over villages and held the unarmed inhabitants hostage

Are you saying your *want* (not *need*) to own a lethal assault weapon equipped with armour-piercing rounds overrides the right of your fellow countrymen to feel safe in public spaces?
What legitimate reason is there to own a murder tool?

Canada has improved a lot lad

tactical strategic high-speed machine gun assault rifle

Attached: 53pr8sr.png (625x300, 27K)

Weak bait
But people need to own weapons that are on par with the weapons military uses, for the purpose of fighting the government if it oversteps its boundaries
How does the saying go?
Freedom exists when the government is afraid of its people

I'm and was joking. I am buying a gun for plinking but not under the delusion of self defense in public, CC is nonsense

Also rogue militaries like a cartel

Attached: 1518038279726.png (485x443, 23K)

100% correct
Look at the michoacan story in mexico
Local citizens armed themselves and drove most of the cartel forces out of their state

attempting to cc an ar-15 might be nonsense, but there is LITERALLY nothing wrong with wanting to cc a handgun(in the us of a), prove me wrong.
protip: you can't