Bitcoin Cash is unironically unstoppable

Bitcoin Cash is unironically unstoppable.

Attached: bitcoin.jpg (600x800, 57K)

Other urls found in this thread:

themerkle.com/calvin-ayre-predicts-a-bitcoin-cash-price-of-10000-in-may/
trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=bitcoin cash
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

god, what a fucking chad

>greenscreened

>bcash hashrate is only 5% of bitcoin network hashrate
>bcash can be 51% attacked with just 2.5% of bitcoin's current hashrate
>unstoppable

k e k

Attached: cheesus.png (600x800, 370K)

>it ain't gonna suck itself

i dont see em doing it tho. if anyone tried that shit, versace ver would beat the shit out of em

Why isn't anyone doing it then?

so go ahead and 51% it then, bitch boi

>losses, the coin

>those shoes

He's got some big feet.

Oh look, another imitation bitcoin thread.

Yes, nobody can stop it from crashing and burning.

Bcash? isn't that the fork that plummeted from 0.3 to BTC down through 0.25, 0.2, 0.15, and 0.1? That is, it is right now three times more shit than when it forked?

Because I've heard they're hiring their first dev so hopefully that'll turn things around >taps nose

>>taps nose

Attached: 1501384528746.jpg (461x583, 5K)

It fucking better, I've been holding mine since the goddamn fork.

actually bitcoin forked from bcash
bcash is the original, i didnt believe it either at first. but you should look into it before running your mouth son

that's a big guy

If you're going to bet on a coin replacing BTC why would you choose one that has such a minor advtange (increased block size). Why not just invest in Monero or Nano, ya know, something with actual innovative technological improvements over BTC. BCash is literally just a shittier version of Litecoin.

Attached: plush pepe.jpg (425x425, 23K)

cashies piggyback off the bitcoin name. Might aswell buy BTCP kek, same ballpark

BCASH IS THE REAL BITCOIN PLEASE STOP SAYING OTHERWISE

oh my god how can one man be so based

>Stuff doesn't go his way, so tries to buy people off.
Every time.
If he wasn't lucky enough to have a fortune to blow in the first place you likely would never have heard of bcash.
He's owned and controlled opposition, btw.

BCH has more miner support than bitcoin they would never pull that, it may look like its small right now but they are waiting for it to start moving and growing in size and price.

Thats like like Nevis in the background and he has a house in St Kitts so probably legit

yeah, the fork that bottomed at 0.05 after the first pump, bottomed at 0.07 after the second pump and 0.09 after the 3rd pump? Damn, must suck to see Bitcoin Cash on such a long term uptrend...

Attached: 47565347856.png (645x773, 87K)

>bcash is the original, i didnt believe it either at first. but you should look into it before running your mouth son

So riddle me this:

who cares?

The original construct doesn't matter. The market evolved and Bitcoin won over Bcash. And guess what? Bitcoin is still as useless as ever. It functions as a successful blockchain, yes. But other than that, what does it do?

Bitcoin doesn't serve a defined purpose. It was a proof of concept that took off and got more overbought than any asset in history. The only purpose it serves now is as an index to the crypto market and as a source of liquidity for alts. Other than that, it has no purpose.

BTC didn't fall into that role out of intent. It evolved into its current place. And to say that Bcash is going to absorb that role.. how and why would that ever happen? Bitcoin is there because of first mover advantage and if anything takes over that first slot, it's definitely not going to be another imitation.

If anything is going to overtake that number one slot in the crypto markets in the future, I bet it doesn't even exist yet.

You guys maybe in for a surprise, Calvin Ayre has publicly predicted Bitcoin Cash will be 10k in May, this guy knows things the average biz tard could only dream of.

themerkle.com/calvin-ayre-predicts-a-bitcoin-cash-price-of-10000-in-may/

Isn't this guy a manlet?

It'll be gone by June 4th. Screencap this. Ayre has bags. He doesn't give a toss about bitcoin, he's just trying to make a fast buck from whatever scam he can jump onto. Same as his friend provably fake satoshi Craig Wright.

>So riddle me this:

riddle me this
who's afraid of the big bad bat

5'2"

Stop making these threads so we can all buy more cheaper.

4 u

probably substratum

you HAD your chance. now it's cashies' time to shine.

Attached: 782346785657836.jpg (683x1024, 78K)

I doubt it he just heavily reinvested in more mining equipment and released breaking plans for new 100 million dollar cash casino, they are just getting started.

>11x in 1 month
kek
totally not wishful thinking bois

You think you can double the hashpower in an instant and they wont notice? You do know that you can ONLY buy premium SHA256 ASICS with Bitcoin CASH right? The Chinese who make them will only accept it and they already stated they are selling BTC to buy BCH and you think they'd allow a 51% attack to happen? Kek

How bad will corecucks feel when bitcoin cash rockets to .5? Do you think they'll FOMO on or persist in their delusions?

Fpbp

Meant for above

How do popped bubbles float OP?

trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=bitcoin cash

Attached: bagholding.jpg (460x287, 36K)

>First mover advantage
The bitcoin I bought in 2012 exists on both the BCH and BTC chain.

an unknown party can be withholding blocks right now, ready to unleash on the Bcash network whenever they want.

look up a block withholding attack

also, Bitmain accepts fiat for their miners as well. Not to mention ''premium'' sha256 asic Halong miners and Canaan miners.

Miners love bitcoin cash. It's more likely they'd do that on the bitcoin network kek

Seriously. That's how you know all these corefags are also newfags. Best case scenario they both go up a shit ton

no because bcash hashrate is only 5% of bitcoin network hashrate

bcash can be 51% attacked with just 2.5% of bitcoin's current hashrate

Miner signalling is pro bitcoin cash. Try again corecuck

ok bro

You know most miners think bitcoin is a failed project and are ready to up on board bitcoin cash, right?

They really do. They just don't want to dump on you btc fags all at once or it would ultimately hurt market confidence in bch.

let me take a wild guess -
you learned about crypto in december 2017.

bcash is a hardfork, segwit was a softfork. The softfork is the backwards compatible fork, and therefore is the continuation fork. bcash implemented replay protection further solidifying itself as a fork and not the original chain.

>look into it

You have no idea what you're talking about.

Attached: adqakc6dq9901.jpg (1334x293, 84K)

Are you a business owner that wants cheaper fees than credit cards?
This was the big selling point of Bitcoin from 2009-2015.
Obvious choice: BCH

Are you a normal user that wants to spend the least amount in fees for transactions on a fully decentralized network?
Obvious answer: BCH

Do you want to support a currency that enables the poor people of the world to participate?
Obvious answer: BCH

Do you want a currency that only wealthy people can use and excludes poor people?
Obvious answer: BTC

Do you want to support a currency that's struggling to scale, and is depending on an unproven, arguably unsolvable technology that requires hubs and trusting others?
Obvious answer: BTC

hash rate changes by the hour it could be 20% by morning, if they want to try it go for it the threat is not going to stop anything.

>he thinks hard forks are abnormal

Its just software upgrades. XMR does hardforks I think quarterly and BCH is doing another soon. BTC use to do them all the time as well until Blockstream came into the picture.

So be honest with me,

do you cashies really believe that Bcash will overtake BTC?

>expecting honesty from paid shills
you must be kidding

It 100% will. Every sign points toward it.

>cashcuck doesn't know what a contentious hard fork is
fucking pajeet

Attached: 1522514906937.jpg (1280x720, 93K)

Firstly, let me accept your admission of being mistaken: bcash is the hardfork, has minority hashing power, a lower market cap, fewer developers, and a smaller community, with less acceptance. Let's just call a spade a spade. Glad you came around so quick.

Secondly, hark forking is contentious when it goes beyond a bug fix or change that has obvious implications. In the case of bitcoin versus bcash issue, both segwit and an increased blocksize represented contentious choices with non-obvious implications. Hardforking in such as situation just isn't the same as when a shitcoin hardforks in its early days, or hardforking for a critical bugfix.

Attached: 1502463195414.jpg (2000x1000, 362K)

>Btc fag doesn't doesnt know segwit is a shitty, irreversable malleability fix. It was rushed, just like lightning network.

lul, good point.

people actually arguing about this are delusional. tunnel vision over the past market without considering the future.

utility tokens are going to make this market.

what signs? is CBOE opening a cashie market?

It has to. Either it or XMR. XMR imo is actually better money, but I don't think people fully appreachiate privacy yet. They'll come around though. However if BCH can actually pull of the extension blocks with zkSnarks, it could give XMR a run for its money.

>sticking to the whitepaper is contentious
Core could have avoided all this blow back by just increasing blocksize. They would have still caught a bunch of flack for Segwit, but as long as it remained a non-essential opt-in people probably wouldn't have cared much.

>inb4 Segwit is opt-in
>inb4 LN will be opt-in
>implying paying $100s in fees and waiting a week for your money to clear is a fucking option

I don't believe, I know.
>mfw the war is already won

Attached: smug-satoshi.png (1700x972, 1.93M)

Bitcoin cash market adoption is growing more and more every day. Bitcoin has failed miserably in keeping its functionality.

>miner hashing power
Miners support bitcoin cash by their signalling
>Fewer developers
Irrelevant since bitcoin has no innovation, kek
>Smaller community
Merchants love bitcoin cash
>Less acceptance
HAHAHAHA

Attached: 1516708794112.jpg (1375x1656, 1.06M)

>brainlet shill thinks we aren't going to listen to the teams of phds and programmers who make up the Bitcoin dev team and instead are going to entertain the retarded conspiracy theories of an outrage subreddit

Attached: 1524085933702.jpg (700x734, 107K)

Here are the facts corecucks

Attached: Smug bitcoin JESUS.jpg (419x519, 67K)

>(((adam beck))) and (((gregory maxwell))) mock those who study economics and you expect them to make BTC economically viable?? top kek

whoops didn't mean to meme arrow there

The end is near for Bitcoin.

Attached: dead-bitcoin.png (396x282, 157K)

Big-blockers were the majority hashrate before the NYA was announced.
Miners generally mine whatever chain is the most profitable because that's the smart move right now based off the current economics.
See the suspected Bitmain BCH address that has been selling all BTC rewards for BCH with each block they mine.

Tons of development is happening on BCH right now - see all the new use-cases only available on BCH and not BTC (yours, memo, satoshidice, etc. etc)

Acceptance is growing constantly. Reminds me of when Bitcoin was spreading to stores like a virus - for months it's been normal for BTC to be removed from stores.

SegWit was contentious - it's the entire reason BCH was created. Today's BTC is not the Bitcoin of previous years. The previous Bitcoin didn't have a two-tier fee system, or different nodes that see different transactions, or a roadmap with develops that supported excluding the poor by encouraging high fees.

Segwit was a soft-fork, not a hard-fork, sorry sweetie

lmao I don't give a shit about your marketing script pajeet-kun. You claimed hard-forks are often used, and that's true, but contentious forks are not. Contentious forks are very dangerous for a coin and risk destroying the protocol (which is what bitcoin cash tried to do).
>as long as it remained a non-essential opt-in
Segwit is opt-in, that's what soft-forks are, my cuck friendo. You can still use BTC without using Segwit, you are just butthurt because Jihan ran out of money to bribe crypto companies from enabling it and it keeps going up in use.

Attached: 1522510728049.jpg (1280x720, 141K)

I prefer my txs onchain. It's actually kind of revolting that you want to do txs offchain.

>lmao I don't give a shit about your marketing script pajeet-kun
Stopped reading here. Go be a faggot somewhere else then, people are trying to discuss things.

>c-competition is an attack on bitcoin

top kek. you communist faggots need to get bent

How many economics scientific papers did Roger write?
Also how many economists were involved with the creation of Bitcoin. I'll answer for you: 0.
Who says we need those cucks now? lmaoing @ur life

Attached: 1522509834998.png (824x555, 67K)

I didn't say it was a hardfork faggot

nobody has a problem with altcoins. Rename your coin, stop claiming it is "muh original vision" and nobody will give a shit about you Raj-kun.

>Stopped reading here
whatever makes you feel better about being BTFO, pal

soft-forks are opt-in by definition. You are claiming Core forced people wheras they have gone out of their way to implement the protocol improvements in a way that would be completely up to the single, free choice of the economic agents of the network, while Roger autistically screeched things should be done and enforce in his own way while inventing neo-language like "economic code". I wouldn't expect a mechanical turk pajeet to understand though.

Attached: 1522511271847.jpg (1920x1080, 151K)

the official coin of late adopters

Bcash at least has replay protection and HF safe headers now. It is superior to S2X. It also doesn’t seek to force itself on anyone who doesn’t want it.” - Greg Maxwell

Attached: 1_ApEC4GWa1B-WRQjVmBr62w.png (350x350, 154K)

the official statement of late adopters

>muh "soft fork"
>transactions with no signatures are backwards compatible
spotted the tech illiterate

Blockstream/Core urged everybody to switch to segwit during the "spam attacks".

Swell, then you can pay the price for onchain txns. If you want cheap txns, you can use 2nd layer payment channels.

If you want a network consisting of nodes run out of data centers or only in places with high bandwidth, then enjoy your paypal 2.0

Attached: 1519074532422.png (1264x6025, 734K)

sorry kid, if you were an early adopter you would have been given more bcash that you know what to do with, for free, in a nice little airdrop. but you keep buying.

t. sold his forked coins

>says the late adopter
heh, kiddo