1. Your country

1. Your country
2. Do women in your country like guns

I'll start

1. America
2. Yes, except for the filthy commies and fascists in some of the cities.

Attached: gun girl.png (480x558, 312K)

Whats to like about a gun? Its a tool made for killing. What shes doing is for attention but in general do you like the idea of being in danger constantly as well as being forced to kill other people in order to protect yourself? It might be necessary but something that you like? I thought people wouldnt like killing after theyve done it but in general from africa to asia to south america many pose with the corpse and seem unphased.

No one's forcing you to do anything. No one is making you not be a soyboy. It's a right, not a requirement.

Attached: girls and guns.jpg (1700x956, 368K)

Guns are interesting theres many different guns that work in many different ways, and they usually have some history behind them like pic related which was designed for german cops after the munich olympic massacre, which caused them to realize that they needed more firepower,
Were as most guns over .380 acp, work by having the barrel travel back with the slide for a few milimeters, this one has a gas piston delay the backward movement of the slide, long enough for presure to drop to a safe level. Its got a lever that cocks the gun and that must be held for it to fire (german police wanted the gun to be safe to carry with a round in the chamber)
>tdlr
>guns are cool on a mechanical level
>the history behind guns is often interesting
>target shooting is fun
>having the means to defend yourself aint a bad idea

Attached: D5DF9C77-F74B-4315-9794-3434CFC3C0FD.jpg (1889x1243, 1.62M)

>so why do you like X
>no ones forceing you to like x and you are a soyboy reeeeeeeeeee

>why yes i do carry around a 20'' barrel assault rifle with a precision fire optic in CQB enviroments for protection
are women unironically this fucking retarded?

Attached: 1525177977727.png (817x891, 32K)

Would love to come and take it if you get what I mean.

1. Russia
2. No, guns are for retards.

1. Hung Aryan Republic
2. no women doesnt like tiny penises

I like her hair. It's cute :)

>pic
>the solution to police violence is shooting the cops

??? ???

>Campus
>CQB enviroment

Nigga you are the stupid one here.

But yeah, that optic makes zero sense on an AR-15

There wont be any police violence if there are no cops will there?

>Kent State
there a 90% chance she actually thinks they deserved to get shot

More like *snicker* more like *giggle* CUNT state AHAHAHAHAHA

Can't wait till carbon nanotubes makes all firearms obsolete

>implying it will

>I'm very edgy. See look, I don't like CNTs. That makes me smart!

Attached: 2342.jpg (450x258, 18K)

>look at my cool material nobody will ever be able to afford

>oh hi u silly men I am just like u look here is my GUN and I drive a TRUCK real girls drive stick u know hehe now who’s gonna take care of my son his daddy is not a real man!

Also, a bullet need not penetrate if its just has enough energy.

steel was extremely expensive until Carnegie came along

Aluminum was more expensive than gold.

Does your tiny brain not comprehend technological advancement?

god you are stupid. Look at what the the graph says. A bullet goes well under 2000 m/s and has energies less than 20,000 j for all rounds except anti tank rounds.

not an AR 15 fucknugget. Its an AR 10 chambered 7.62. Perfectly reasonable to have high magnification optics on a rifle like that

>steel was extremely expensive until Carnegie came along
>Aluminum was more expensive than gold.
>Does your tiny brain not comprehend technological advancement?

>Firearms technology wont advance, I swear

>god you are stupid. Look at what the the graph says. A bullet goes well under 2000 m/s and has energies less than 20,000 j for all rounds except anti tank rounds.

Yes, and that energy has to be transfered somewhere doesnt it?

The magazine looks fat for an AR-15, ill give you that, but also looks too curved for 7.62. Are you sure?

>originally argues that no one will ever manufacturer cnts
>gets btfo
>"w-well firearms will advance too. e-even though the basic principles of firearms havent changed in 200 years a-and no advances in firearms have been made except to make them lighter and have better optics"

Really funny sw*doid

>e-even though the basic principles of firearms havent changed in 200 years
Is this bait?
>a-and no advances in firearms have been made except to make them lighter and have better optics"
Yep, thats bait.

Now, how do you even think you are going to protect a human with your super material? Do you think all citizens and cops suddenly will walk around in several kilos heavy body suits covering 100% of the body?

>CNTs
>heavy

bye retard

Flag
Not really. We do have lots of guns but they are mostly for hunting.

I don't get the fascination for all these attatchments that americans like putting on their guns.
Like why in the world would you need a DMR optic on an assault rifle you intend to use in self defence?
Silencer, laser sights, range finders, bump stocks, fucking hell the list goes on.
If you have a holo sight and a foregrip that is more than enough for 99.99% of armed confrontation

You still havent provided any credible evidence that it could replace normal clothes or even would be available or wanted by the general public, wich means your original point failed miserably.

women do everything for attention

Capitalism

People want to be independent, and having and carrying guns is a necessity to that end. They're a symbol of freedom, which we serfs sadly lack.

For the most part ARs are just range toys and the attachments are just there because the owners think they look cool.

me on my daily walk to school

Attached: Bundesarchiv_B_145_Bild-F073468-0019,_Manöver,_Kampfpanzer_Leopard_2.jpg (800x533, 50K)