Who would win in a fight: Australia or Finland?
Who would win in a fight: Australia or Finland?
Other urls found in this thread:
Finland
unless Australia has the Emus on their side
Finland has a big army of conscripts and both have alot of weaponry. If it's strictly one on one, I think Finland has a good chance, although I'm not sure about how their navies compare
Australia has kangaroos and emus, we have bears and mosquitoes. It's a tough one.
Why fight when we can all just get along and drink some beer.
If fight woul take take place at north, FInns easily
Again deserts arent what we are genetically build for
Australia has a way higher military budget and more people so we'd get there but it not like we'd be able to occupy or probably defeat the waves of expendable pseudo-slav conscripts.
The two biggest shitposting powers... Hard decision
>pseudo-slav
Kek. You are a qutie.
I guess everyone knows how it would turn out.
We'd all set these sick cunts up in the trenches to keep the charade up for the world stage while we're all sitting in linked up tunnels having beers and vodka.
you guys couldnt even give us challence what it comes to forrest war
I think you'd be surprised.
Anyway it just depends on who is invading who, we both have nearly opposite climates and have standout defensive achievements so the defender is probably going to win without much doubt.
I bet Finland could make some headway into Australia. I don't know about the reverse.
Well we apparently have their navy and air force beat by quite an amount so I'm not entirely sure they'd get enough feet on ground to make any headway. They have superior ground vehicles over us though so it would probably depend on their ability to transport those onto land and make use of them.
I don't want to fight Australians. They're nice people. :3
Just pretend they're Russians.
Australia has double the miltary budget of Canada and 6 times Finland right. All that would happen is we'd occasionally bomb shit in Finland, their entire military is based around stopping Russians land invading.
Both of the countries are defensive type of country. So it matters of luck. If the war happens to be in Australia, then Australia will win. If the war happens to be in Finland, then Finland will win.
What if the war was fought with shitposting?
Well we're more immune to cocks, anime and gaysex I'd like to think.
anglo can fight, neither abo mixttures of you.
We again are bascily warrior nation
its not even a question
Australia of course
they have a much stronger navy, including aircraft carriers, which is backbone of every great military
>We again are bascily warrior nation
t. actually boipussi, i coudl take down least 10 of yur kind before going to tuonela
australia
Australia is an occupied territory, their masters will not tolerate interference on the subjects they rule.
Emus
Neither could successfully defeat and occupy the other
The Eternal Leaf would covertly fund both sides of the conflict with shitposting and as soon as one side was on the verse of losing, intervene and take all the glory.
My local zoo has one emu in it. I'm sure were gonna win this one boys.
There are mosquitoes in Finland? Never would’ve guessed. Isn’t it mostly cold there year round? I live in Oregon and mosquitoes are pretty rare.
During summer they get absolutely ridiculous swarms of mossies. Animals get sucked dry.
I've mentioned this a couple of times on other threads, but when climate change allows them to spread further absolutely everyone is going to have Russian AIDS.
Why would we ever leave our countries to fight each other? We're the last bastions of internet autism of our respective hemispheres.
I imagine the reverse would happen in Finland
Finland.
Because Australians are a load of faggots due to the British blood. Look at the state of the UK right now. Oz is following suit by their creation of a nanny state. Same goes for NZ.