Daily reminder that Bitcoin Cash is the REAL Bitcoin

Attached: 1523299456640.png (657x539, 110K)

>bcesh is reel bicoim

Attached: 1522019230510.jpg (1066x600, 64K)

*shilling intensifies* It's painful watching the growing desperation of cashies trying to dump their heavy bags.

What happens to Bcash once core increases block size? Block sizes will increase in core, wiping out Bcash's reason for existence. Roger Ver is an emotional babby who loses his mind whenever things don't go his way. Don't listen to him.

They're screwed either way. Increase block size - admitting that Lightning Network is a piece of shit, or stay a piece of shit forever. Cashies can't lose.

Blockstream have a tight hold on bitcoin if you want freedom accept Cash as the real savior

Attached: 1524085602256 copy.jpg (575x602, 179K)

>BCH
shitcoin is still shitcoin, no matter how much some millionaires try to pump it up

blockstream owns bitcoin
miners own bcash
so neither is free

>millionaires
You have no idea what you're up against

miners are chads who get paid for securing the network. How do they "own" the network? They can't steal your money.

Core can't increase blocksize without miners running the new software. They already alienated all the miners and made them cashies, so why would the miners now help corecucks remain competitive?

Cashies can't lose.

>Increase block size - admitting that Lightning Network is a piece of shit,
If people use LN a lot, the block size will have to be increased anyway. Even if it takes 20k transactions/block to do it.
To be fair though, neither coin has problems with long confirmation times, aside from peak times.

>miners own bcash
So... exactly like bitcoin pre-segwit?
Glad we both understand that BCH is in fact BTC.

Good luck with that. Even if by some miracle they did, shitcoincore still has Segwit which is basically super AIDs.

>miners own bcash

There is a reason for that.

Attached: Trustless Network.gif (500x213, 404K)

Nobody will ever seriously use Lightning Network. Routing still doesn't work, and the only people "using" lightning network are people who set up direct channels to somebody for testing or magic upvotes. At the same time it literally can take hundreds of LN transactions (without fees) to make up the difference from BCH, despite all the horrible technicalities.

>still thinks that bch is the real bitcoin
>doesn't know why btx is pumping
>doesn't know about BTXM
kek

Craig Wright has already developed the technology to create paper Bitcoin cash that can be used in trade. If you don't think that gives him an incredible advantage over blockstream then you are retarded.

Attached: memento.png (619x819, 728K)

> Segwit which is basically super AIDs
how do you propose to fix the malleability problem? zander's tardtastical flextrans which has no explanation anywhere except a shitcoin-tier smiley/frowny-face comparison list?

Segwit only solves malleability for Segwit transactions not Bitcoin Core.

Link?

so? thats like saying bip16 only allows scripts to be used in p2sh transactions not bitcoin core

It means the problem is fundamentally unsolved. Segwit is an unsecured workaround.

no it doesnt, in any way. the problem is solved; bitcoin transactions using the segwit tx type are no longer txid-malleable.

mobile.twitter.com/proffaustus?lang=en
Look at the pinned tweet, a few weeks ago he had posted an image with 50 BCH embedded in an open transaction if you could find it. This is also discussed in publications on nchain.

craig wright is a cryptobabbling scam artist

>mobile.twitter.com/proffaustus?lang=en
nice, this is more credible than him claiming you know what

Spoonfeed me pls since I can't access twitter.

repeating a lie doesn't make it true, it just makes you sound more desperate

Attached: bcash.png (600x400, 519K)

>Using conspiracy theories that could come straight from Hitler
We all know Where this is going

Other than having four times the block size (assuming changing to weight based measurement gives a 2x) how does bch process more transactions than bitcoin (core in this case)?
Right now, all it has going for it is less people using it, and filling blocks.

With larger blocks?

fork.lol/pow/hashrate

Unless these lines are about to touch again, I'd recommend never touching the literal cancer that is BCH.

I said other than four times the block size.
Is bitcoin cash going to have another hard fork when it has a 10x increase in users? I would expect that, but that'll be a massive kick in the dick.

As I said, even larger blocks.

I don't see why it wouldn't up block size to accommodate users. Although I think the long term plan is to have adaptive block sizes.

What do you see triggering this? Has everyone agreed on what the criteria are for changing blocksize again?
>Although I think the long term plan is to have adaptive block sizes.
Why? If the block limit is 50MB, And it's not full, it won't be that size anyway.
Some kind of attempt to stop persistent spam?

>Some kind of attempt to stop persistent spam?
Transactions aren't spam, even if for some reason that's what someone is attempting to do. Adaptive blocks just prevent needing to HF every so often, although for the next few years BCH will probably be HF quite a bit anyway.

I'm feeling kinda Verified'.

Attached: xhkt8nC.jpg_.png (1500x1500, 398K)

this, no matter how hard is trying with his le funny meme images

Attached: africa bible.jpg (565x720, 59K)