What do you consider to be the top 3 greatest threats facing the world today?

1-the usa
2-the usa
3-the european court of human rights

1. Resource usage and pollution
2. Globalization
3. Population growth

1. Zionist Jews dismantling the west's middle class and homogeneity.
2. Antibiotic Resistant Superbugs
3. Artificial Intelligence (although I hope it happens)

Attached: mrh.jpg (330x245, 66K)

>neo-liberalism
And what alternative do you propose if free market mercantilism is a threat to the world?

Attached: communist selfrighteous dumb poorfag.jpg (1985x2048, 456K)

1) Climate Change
2) Neoliberalism
3) USA

It's destroyed every country it's infested. The only reason why a few Muslim nations are successful is solely oil wealth. And they aren't diversifying their economies in this short window of prosperity.

Totally agreed about Islam, that religion seems like a mental disease. An overall normal muslim who doesn't even follow any rules of Islam turns into an insane psychopath when you joke about Islam or mention Muhammad or Allah in negative context. They literally start threatening you and are getting ready to fight you to death over it with a satanic look in their eyes.

So
1. Islam and terrorism (pretty much same things)
2. Possibility of a global military conflict
3. Corruption and nepotism among top political figures

Islam has destroyed a good portion of humanity or at least has left a good portion of it essentially in the middle ages.

They're a different kind of threat because they're invading actually successful western societies and out breeding them.

Islam is a black hole of human progress. Islam societies are the least technologically successful ones along side primitive blacks.

I honest wouldn't mind them if they breed like cockroaches within their own damn countries because who gives a shit.

But them gaining a foothold in France and Germany is sad.

They're a detriment to humanity in general. At least if the east Asians take over human kinds tech growth and scientific progress and long term survival is guaranteed.

Right because there have been no successful Muslim countries before. The Ottoman Empire and Persia don’t exist, Indonesia and Malaysia are made up. The current instability has way more to do with shit like the Sykes-Picot agreement, the region wasn’t nearly such a mess before WW1.

>implying most business owners are small business owners
>implying managers and owners are the same thing

Wew

Not even mentioning nooks. What, are you a noob?

Man I have experienced this several times. I was an acquaintance with a Muslim dude who seemed very liberal and ultra nice but then I checked out what he posts on forums and shit. Fucking Christ, like clockwork he supports sharia , banning Pre-marital sex, extra tax on non believers and supports spreading the religion everywhere they go.

What's the appropiate term for the influence left wing ideas about multiculturalism being a good thing, free market being a bad thing etc. holds on the governments of western countries?

1. whatever that concept is called
2. the USA (has nukes and will collapse)
3.African population growth (ruining Europe in combination with 1)

And what alternative do you propose if free market mercantilism is a threat to the world?

I'm not a communist, market economies kick the absolute shit out of planned ones, but you need balance. At the moment its way in the favour of the rich who have been getting steadily richer while everybody else has been getting poorer.
Like the housing market here. A huge bubble which is a naked wealth transfer from people who don't have enough money to buy a house but need to not be homeless and people that can afford a house.

Attached: Australia_real_wages_productivity_1978_2010.jpg (482x290, 23K)

Some cultures and religions thrived during periods centuries ago. Islam is incompatible with the modern world. At least traditionalist Islam is. Iran actually was looking like a first world country for a bit there.

A transition to market socialism based on free markets and worker co-ops followed by further transition to a planned economy based on extensive automation and computerization.

>hardcore reddit spacing

1. capitalism
2. fascism
3. racism

>Indonesia and Malaysia are made up
Lol, Indonesia is a massive shithole and being a successful empire in the past purely required them to be brutal fucks in warfare.

Their previous societies were actually on par with rest of the world and even slightly more liberal in some aspects but the thing is they have regressed or at least stayed with that ancient ass backward mentality and they refuse to change.

Malaysia is also mostly successful because of oil lol.(how do these fucks keep ending up above oil). Their industry only slightly more diversified than the Saudis.

Iran is unironically now more open and democratic than they were under the Shah. I don’t like Islam at all, but to say that it’s a threat to the world or that it alone is responsible for this chaos when modern Islamism as an ideology has only existed since the mid 20th century is retarded.

>Malaysia is also mostly successful because of oil lol.(how do these fucks keep ending up above oil). Their industry only slightly more diversified than the Saudis.

Wow so natural resources make countries successful who knew. It’s almost as if geography and access to resources is a much larger factor than religion.

China
China
Consumerism

1. Automation
2. Ageing population/mass retirement of boomers in the coming years
3. Mental health: increasing narcissism, depression and other anti-social behaviour due to social media abuse

islam
disease
pollution

>when modern Islamism as an ideology has only existed since the mid 20th century is retarded.
I think it's irrelevant to how old modern Islamism is, as the modern version is the version that's spreading fast. In Egypt leaders used to laugh when the topic of compulsory Burqa wear was brought up. Now look at it today. Almost every chick is ingrained to wear it.

>Islam is incompatible with the modern world
elaborate
>Iran actually was looking like a first world country for a bit there.
who gives a shit ? most of the country was a rural shithole and the peasants starved.
>natural resources make a country better
who would have thought

1. America
2. Arabs
3. S*eden

Except it means that there is an obvious difference between islam and islamism. I’ll agree the latter is the real threat and needs to be stomped out, although I wouldn’t say it’s anywhere near the greatest threat facing society.

This 100%

1. Artificial Intelligence
2. Mega-corporations
3. Overpopulation

>Consumerism

Attached: ne.gif (600x450, 89K)

The point is they haven't diversified with their oil wealth.They're literally gifted with the world's most valuable resource and this is the best they could do? Dude India is literally massive poverty ridden shithole and they have more scientific achievements(even if we include only the 20th century and beyond) than 99% of the Islamic world.

I'd take nations like south Korea, Japan, Taiwan, even china over these so called developed Muslim nations.

And what alternative do you propose?

>planned economy based on extensive automation and computerization
Go clean some toilets now or I send you to prison. I will check your performance to make sure you fulfill the plan!
t. planning algorithm

You could have just as well said planned economy based on magic and the people deciding about the "planning algorithm" would be de facto dictators.

>>Islam is incompatible with the modern world
>elaborate

BOOM

>Iran actually was looking like a first world country for a bit there.
Tbh, the only ones who were praising Iran with their Shah were Western Capitalists and to some Communists, who preferred a modernist than a Islamist one. Weren't the starving peasants living in the Slums around Tehran the ones who were all in for the return of Khomeini?

all these 3 are actually jews

>Computer technology is bad
>statistics is bad
>free market is bad
>all this technophobia and socialism
The western world is fucked, even this place is full of people who have no idea how the world works.

1.USA, not a sustainable army budget which has to be filled somehow and justified.Can't end well.
2.Pollution, future generations will feel the burn not us tho.
3.Albanians

>Islam
>it's another "dumb redneck Murican who gets all of his information from Rush Limbaugh" episode
why do you perpetuate the stereotype?

ACTUAL top-3:
>lack of clean freshwater
>climate change
>corporations getting too powerful and the fact that typical workers will be replaced by robots

I know modern Iran is more wealthy than Shah Iran but are they really more open and genuinely modern? I thought even for alcohol and partying they have to do it secretly.

The whole wests been going left socially and far right economically. I just want to go back a bit towards a mixed economy with strong unions.
Populism is going to happen though with the internet meaning theres less of a stranglehold on media and a ton of disenfranchised people because here at least we have the first generation which is poorer than their parents.

Nice strawman. You could easily just calculate the necessary outputs based on past consumption trends and consumer research, calculate the most efficient allocation of resources to achieve a particular result, and then allocate those resources to the appropriate production facilities. Individual shops and workers are rewarded by how well they reach or exceed the quotas that are calculated as necessary.

1. Depression
2. Lack of morality
3. Too much pressure on the kids

1. Islam
2. USA
3. no idea. Anime maybe.

what pressure

>Dude India is literally massive poverty ridden shithole and they have more scientific achievements(even if we include only the 20th century and beyond) than 99% of the Islamic world.

Isn't turkey more advanced than us in terms of tech?

Tbh I think India's tech shit is overrated because of our successful diaspora and ISRO. Actual adoption of science and Tech into society and modernisation has been painfully slow to say the least.

Afaik, the police and the state doesn't give many shits as long as the populace doesn't show any movements towards overthrowing the regime.

Can't someone who was actually there elaborate about life in Iran a bit?

Attached: download.jpg (500x667, 69K)

1.Jews
2.Israel
3.Banks/Big corporations/families (jewish) controling the goverments

Attached: 1395441041365.jpg (360x480, 28K)

Too many things to choose from
Nothing to hold on to

>The whole wests been going left socially and far right economically
That's not true. If you earn 50k Euro in Germany, about 50% of that goes directly to the government. That's socialist as fuck.

>Nice strawman. You could easily just calculate the necessary outputs based on past consumption trends and consumer research, calculate the most efficient allocation of resources to achieve a particular result, and then allocate those resources to the appropriate production facilities. Individual shops and workers are rewarded by how well they reach or exceed the quotas that are calculated as necessary.
t. UdSSR

Attached: cache_2544342.jpg (725x485, 58K)

1. Overpopulation, which is at the root of climate change and resource depletion.
2.Cultural tensions in western countries. The failure of the imposition of multiculturalism on countries which have historically always been monocultural will become clear.
3. Myopia: it's estimated that half the world's population will be short sighted by 2050. That's not natural or healthy.

Attached: 1489888624729.jpg (765x765, 155K)

>high taxes in a particular country make up for the systemic deregulation and dismantling of the welfare state across the western world over the course of 30 years

Also the Soviets didn’t really use cybernetic planning, that was one of their main problems actually, since the sheer number of people required to process all their economic information created a bloated bureaucracy. Automating the bureaucratic grunt work and planning process (something that has already been successfully done with stock trading) would cut down on this significantly.

not if you're christian.
it's up to the parent, really.

>even this place is full of people who have no idea how the world works.
Well, how does the world work then? Isn't this kind of elitist mindset the root-cause of the problems though? Noone shows the populace about the personal merits of such a modern society or actually even tries to do so since they are deemed stupid, backward and non-understanding.

Get LASIK

Ah, but the meaning of God and religion today is decreasing in value. That is why its a threat. For example, in Finland as I grew up in elementary school we laughed at the kids who actually believed in God. It is difficult to hold those values in our society and we must bring those values back.
And most Christians do not value God as much as they pretend to, they're too lazy to even read the Bible or obey any of His Laws. If they do obey His Laws they only obey the ones that aren't too difficult for them to obey and ignore the rest.

1.human
2.human
3.human

So how does the planning algorithm plan innovation, change in taste and stuff like that?
I am actually working in the field of machine learning and also have a background in business and economics.What you propose is completely out of the scope of what is possible. Where it is sensible to use make a prediction companies are already doing exactly that for a long time already.
There is no need to make it illegal to operate a business independently of predictions, because that's what your "planned economy by algorithm" implies.

It doesn’t need to plan innovation, it just needs to allocate resources towards r&d. Change in taste isn’t planned, consumer preference information is gathered first and then used as the end goal of planning.

>There is no need to make it illegal to operate a business independently of predictions, because that's what your "planned economy by algorithm" implies.

The alternative is the collapse of the economy due to automation and market saturation. Also it wouldn’t be so much that operating independently of the planned economy would be illegal, it would be more that it would be impractical considering you would have no way of paying for anything, since such a system would likely use something like labour vouchers or other non-transferable notes rather than conventional currency.

ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/socialism_book/new_socialism.pdf

There’s a whole book written on the subject.

>Well, how does the world work then?
To make it short, the "Law" of Supply and Demand dominates most aspects of most people's lifes and free market mercantilism is to this day the economic model that is best suited to make the law work its wonders. The government interferring is justified in some instances, but will only make things worse in the vast majority of cases.

investopedia.com/university/economics/economics3.asp

>It doesn’t need to plan innovation, it just needs to allocate resources towards r&d. Change in taste isn’t planned, consumer preference information is gathered first and then used as the end goal of planning.

Attached: 1526503244538.png (485x443, 38K)

1) pan-Islamism

2) Climate change (both natural and human)

3) Global inequality

Looking at all the Islamic fears ITT, do you guys think the successful East Asian countries like china, Japan, Worst Korea and Taiwan are better off the way they're since degenerate migrants like Blacks and Muslims will never overrun their societies?

It's the same kind of people anyway, at this point most of Europe is hoping Germany loses its shit again and presses restart on liberalism

>it would be more that it would be impractical
Why don't you let people figure that out by themselves?
It this is true, business with impractical business practices will go out of business and the ones with the practical practices remain. Again there is no need for government interference, just letting the free market do its thing is sufficient.

>labour vouchers or other non-transferable notes rather than conventional currency.
that's just giving the currency another name and restricting what it is legal to pay for

>The alternative is the collapse of the economy due to automation and market saturation
Why? If no one wants to buy something, companies will stop producing it because they are otherwise making losses.

1. Islam
2. Jewism
3. Christianity

1. Climate change.
2. Government and for-profit-private data control.
3. Populism and anti-expert sentiment spreading from politics to science, specially healthcare.

1) Overpopulation, which is a fact by now and is one of the causes of climate change and the destruction of ecosystems
2) Related to the previous point, mass migrations
3) The new inquisition, feminism

1) Islam
2) US politics
3) servile European governments not acting in their own interests

>Jewism
What is this?

1) America
2) Global Islamism
3) Global Warming

America -> Supports Global Islamism, Global Islamism -> Feeds back to America and

America + Global Islamism -> Fuelled by Oil, Contributes to Global Warming

>Jewism
A word used to describe both a Jewish act.

>It this is true, business with impractical business practices will go out of business and the ones with the practical practices remain. Again there is no need for government interference, just letting the free market do its thing is sufficient.

The problem with capitalism isn’t that it doesn’t produce efficiently, the problem is that it doesn’t allocate efficiently. Remember that the world is currently suffering from simultaneous epidemics of starvation and obesity. Capitalism also takes on a life of its own, and ruthlessly exploits all available resources and people towards the greatest possible profit, regardless of the damage caused to society or the long term ecological sustainability. Climate change, and more importantly our inability to effectively deal with the problem, is proof of this latter fact. That isn’t even getting into all the disturbing political implications that have come with the polarization of wealth, at this rate most countries will be in the pockets of literal Bond villains. It has systematically created a global oligarchy, and poses an existential threat to political freedom.

>that's just giving the currency another name and restricting what it is legal to pay for

And? It would fundamentally change the way the economy operated, and more importantly it would make things like corruption much harder to accomplish, as well as strangling capitalism without having to arrest anybody.

>Why? If no one wants to buy something, companies will stop producing it because they are otherwise making losses.

Right, and if nobody can buy anything because all the jobs are automated, or if nobody wants to buy anything because they have everything they want, then the system will collapse because the businesses will all shut down. That’s why market saturation and automation threaten to destroy the economy.

1. Jewnited states of zion
2. Climate change
3. Globalism/ post nationalism
Honourable mention: African population boom

And how do you propose to make the populace understand that "law" or fact? Survival of the fittest is natural in a sense, even in economics, but it will be quite hard to make someone understand that who will definitely live a future of a debt-slave for the rest of his/her life. Religion is dead (except Islam ironically), nationalism is dead, humanitarianism is good and all but a poorfag will give a shit about some starving African if he himself is barely kept alive from starving.

Malaysian main exports are electronic circuits

I simply don't understand what's the end goal of most mega corporations are.

I mean look at Apple their CEOs and the company has more than it ever needs or ever will yet they continuously choose to avoid taxes.

I mean what is the end goal? Neither the company nor the CEOs will ever spend them, so why not invest it back, I am not even saying give it charity but invest back in their own fucking companies in their own fucking products(I heard they spend more on advertisement than research).

Am I missing something? Is there a 2012 movie like scenario where all the elites are spending their wealth on building an arc to save their ass? It literally doesn't make sense unless they're autists who like to make money for the sake of making money.

destructive capitalism and/or the jewish faith

>To make it short, the "Law" of Supply and Demand dominates most aspects of most people's lifes
>”hey mom can I have a hug?”
>”idk what will you pay me for it”

Nice meme.

Attached: 27068045-C945-4B5E-BF44-4B61F9A6F2DE.jpg (640x916, 163K)

Malaysian government is still reliant on oil exports. The recent trend in high tech industry is an attempt to escape the middle income trap they're stuck as they realized they always can't depend on oil.

Though that still doesn't change the fact they're moving to a more industrialized economy and tech oriented economy. So that makes them better than the likes of Iran, Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

>And how do you propose to make the populace understand that "law" or fact
The best way would be mandatory economics classes in school showing how and why the free market works, and how sabotaging the free market makes everyone poorer.
Here is a 1 hour video that basically covers what anyone without an interest in the topic needs to have heard.
youtube.com/watch?v=bFxvy9XyUtg

Ideal would be university level courses in Economics but this is too much to ask for in my opinion.

>a poorfag will give a shit about some starving African if he himself is barely kept alive from starving.
I think you meant to add *not give a shit. And yes, it's true and it's okay. It's natural not to give a fuck about genetically and culturally different people on the other side of the planet.

>The problem with capitalism isn’t that it doesn’t produce efficiently, the problem is that it doesn’t allocate efficiently.
Ressources are allocated by people simultaneously being willing to sell and to buy at a price. If someone can't afford food, that's because no one wants to sell at the price he proposes. By arttificially giving people food they can't afford you actually make things worse, because the population that can't support itself will grow. That's what happened in Africa. If no one interferred with market mechanisms, a far lower number of people would have starved. In my opinion that would have been less bad than artificially creating a situation in that millions of people will starve and others are forced to pay for this via taxes that the government distributes in Africa.

>”hey mom can I have a hug?”
>yes of course, it costs me nothing and I derive pleasure from hugging my child

1. Faith-based religious ideologies
2. Regressive and authoritarian-populist political ideologies spearheaded by exploitative corporate interests under the guise of "freedom"
3. Reality television and the resultant celebrity-worshipping culture of absolute morons, and in a broader context the unfettered access of any and all unqualified and uneducated people to a potentially global soap-box

I think the future is going to be pretty bright for Islamic countries that are stable, especially those in the Gulf. They are so underrated and now they're searching for alternative income other than oil to build their country, if they follow the footsteps of Malaysia, they can be the one of the most advanced region in the world. Also even Saudi Arabia is fighting terrorism now, that is a good thing. Meanwhile, it seems my country is getting radicalised and juat gonna be a shittier state in the future

1. International jewry
2. Non-white birthrates
3. Islam

1. Climate Change/Littoralisation/Mass Migration as a result
2. Hyper-Consumerism
3. AI

Muslims and boomers.

1. Jews
2. Niggers
3. Gooks

Attached: cyganka_mysli_jak_okrasc_polaka.jpg (1280x720, 81K)