When will the USA realize the world is not theirs?

Attached: flat,550x550,075,f.u2.jpg (550x326, 29K)

>I don't care how hard their citizens and economy suffers after Brexit
lmao okay m8
aren't you that one bitter EU-loving Britain-hating fingolian

Post Iranian qts

Attached: per.png (602x602, 697K)

The only people who hate the deal are war hawks, pro-israel fanatics, the illiterate, the misinformed and those who are still bitter about the 79 revolution
Our population is just devoid of consciousness and knowledge of policy.

that's a haram Iranian qt
Here's a Halal Iranian qt

Halal Iranian qt > Haram Iranian qt

the liberal atheistic ones are really messed up in the head
genuine psychos
literally worst tier people

Attached: 108199-3.jpg (400x479, 50K)

So that they won't start a massive regional war that will obviously spill into europe, or get nukes and trigger a nuclear arms race in the region?
In return you get profits?

based

Iran will win!

Gotta love Halal girls

Attached: 416d1aa0e67a5970f499380b6df5ce0e.jpg (500x623, 75K)

Most of them wear is very loose.
Do you consider that haram?

So does the US. Drumpf is not America

Iran deal is not good you retard.
The world is fucking scared or try to postpone the problem.
Iran still has nuclear capabilities but what is really important it is developing rockets and other stuff which is handed to some shady groups like houthies and Hezbollah and those who go under yellow banners in Iraq.

The only way to """deal""" with shia Iran is simply overthrow its blood thirsty regime and all other things are only tricks of some western nations' leaders to blind their people and avoid taking the real decision.

It is stupid to seek peace with someone whose ideology is widely based on idea of killing/enslaving you.

>
EU companies already caved, the deal's pretty much dead. your """union""" is falling apart at the seams as speak, how's about fixing your internal problems first before trying to act like napoleon on the world stage you irrelevents

Clinton liked the deal and she's most of those

Die you mudslime shit.

>The only way to """deal""" with shia Iran is simply overthrow its blood thirsty regime
US has tried that multiple times and it literally never works. It's like the communism of foreign policy.

Ok Saddam is out isn't he and he poses no threat now. Miloshevich also is and balkans without a doubt are better of now.

>blood thirsty regime
>It is stupid to seek peace with someone whose ideology is widely based on idea of killing/enslaving you.

We are talking about Iran or Russia/USA?

>Iraq

Attached: F67B55ED-D52D-4367-A397-11AB85A73A84.jpg (2048x1365, 929K)

they'll be alright, just needs to walk it off

>the Iran deal is good.
The Iran deal is fucking retarded.

Iran gets:
>Permanent lifting of economic sanctions.
>Zero repercussions for its support of internationally-designated terrorist organisations (including repeatedly supplying them with missiles to launch at Riyadh), arbitrary arrests and imprisonments of Western citizens, and other nefarious actions in the region.

In exchange, the world gets:
>Iran promises not to try making a nuclear weapon for the next 15 years (though they can just tell international inspectors to fuck off when they ask to investigate suspected activity and in doing so buy themselves 27 days to cover up whatever they might've been up to before they're forced to accept inspectors at the cost of reimposed sanctions).

Attached: 1513331994133.jpg (1000x1000, 527K)

Literally most of America thinks the Iran deal is good. The only people who hate are retarded boomers who remember the students and their alt-right enablers.

Listen up Jan. Republic*cks ALWAYS do the same thing.
They implement horrible trickle-down, corporate giveaway economics that enrich the 1%. But they promise Cletus and his inbred brotheruncles that it's really seriously gonna trickle down this time for real ;)
When (for the 900th time) the money mysteriously fails to trickle down and Cletus starts to get flustered, the Republ*cans start a war to boost the economy/patriotism

Don't take my word for it though
>Nixon
Cambodia
>Reagan
Panama, Grenada, Libya, and honorable mention for arming the rebels that would become the Taliban and al-Qaeda. Also Iran-Contra affair
>Bush #1
Persian Gulf War
Bush #2
Afghanistan, Iraq
>Trump
Syria, Iran

Just remember that when you complain about Americans, you're really Rep*blishits. We have no problem and fewer wars when a based Democrat is in office.

should be
>you're really [complaining about] Rep*blishits

fugg :DDDDD

Why is the iran deal good?

>fucking over muslims
>a bad thing
yurop

>thinking that short term
The world gets:
A consumerist Iran over a decade or two
Hopefully fatter too

Iran's demographic makeup is relatively old. Even if trade liberalization occurred, it's never going to be a consumption powerhouse. There simply aren't enough young people.

>destabilizing yet another sandnigger hive so more of them swarm europe
t-thanks cia-chan

they're more than willing to destabilize the region on their own, playing their little games for little prizes in the middle east

PRAISE AHURA MAZDA
FUCK HEADSCARFS, LONG HAIR IS BEAUTIFUL AND ALL SHOULD BE ABLE TO WATCH IT

>powerhouse
Not needed, the goal is simply to pussify the younger generation so support for war efforts go down
Also, making them richer only to tear them down with sanctions much later increases odds of regime change without lifting a finger

how do you sanction an iranian economy deeply integregated with the eu ten years down the line. the deal pretty much meant the Europeans were cool with iran doing whatever it wants when it expires as long as they get paid now

Without a domestic consumer base, Iran will never be rich on their own. Instead they'll have to compete on exports in a global market already supersaturated with exports. Iran is also a mountainous country with poor infrastructure, so they're already at a disadvantage when you account for how much it'll cost to move goods in and out of the country.

There's no scenario where Iran will become rich enough to simply not be a problem. Their biggest competitor is moving the same product across the same routes to the same customers now. The proxy war is already underway, and soon there'll be a real war in the region.

>When will the USA realize the world is not theirs?
Of course it is.

>So that they won't start a massive regional war that will obviously spill into europe, or get nukes and trigger a nuclear arms race in the region?

And what exactly is stopping them from just going “lol fuck the deal we’re gonna do all that shit anyway” after they’ve gotten all the financial concessions? A huge point of contention between the US and Iran on the deal is that they are still able to develop Ballistic missiles and funding groups like Hezbollah and Houthi rebels in Yemen. They have not stopped trying to expand their influence and power in the region, and lifting the Sanctions has only made them even more capable of doing this.

Iran’s government is completely controlled by the Ayatollah who doesn’t need to answer to anyone. He can do whatever he wants whenever he wants. The only thing that can actually stop him is an internal revolt, but their media is completely controlled by the state.

I’m not a big fan of Trump, but he has done good things for us so far. Yeah, he says lots of dumb shit. But some of his policies are good.

I don’t see him winning in 2020 tho

>The first Iraq War was bad
>The US should have just let Iraq invade Kuwait without retribution

Hurr

When you make your own deals, and learn to stay out of our business?

All this shit is gonna be reversed by the Democrat that is elected to power in 2020.

The Democrats don't even have a strategy for 2020 that's significantly different than what they did in 2016. They're also slowly bleeding support among millenials.

>tfw no qt brown gf

It depends on which "wing" of the party candidates belong to. The Bernie-like candidates such as Tulsi Gabbard are gaining popularity if anything among young voters whereas the establishment Dems are more reliant on older voters.
Most likely the election is going to come down to what kind of Democrat is nominated since the party is pretty polarized right now, shit's going to be even more heated than 2016.

Obama approved the Iran deal while completely circumventing Congress. Plenty of people on both sides of the isle were against the deal. Everyone is calling Trump a madman for literally just repealing Obama’s non-binding executive orders.

It’s ironic that people are calling Trump a tyrant for simply repealing unconstitutional orders by king Obama who was so confident that the Democrats would win the election after the end of his term because “It was her turn” that he completely spit on US government checks and balances and thought, “lol I can do whatever I want, and there’s nothing these plebs can do about it”.

Trump is showing the world that, no, you can’t get away with that, and the US government is not some shallow puppet show in which the president can do anything he wants.

Attached: 2321433.jpg (1800x1192, 999K)

>All this shit is gonna get reversed by Democrats

What specifically are the Democrats going to “reverse” when Trump hasn’t actually done anything that can be reversed? Trump simply “reversed” everything Obama did. Obama expanded the powers of the executive office and made a bunch of hollow non-binding agreements with the world while letting the nation degrade in to extreme racial and political polarization under his watch, and now he’s paying the price for his arrogance.

A nation with lack of domestic unity can’t govern the world, and he (and the presidents before him) let our nation become incredibly divided.

Attached: 6ED6B800-2387-4FEE-9C20-76CF7C7DDDB0.png (373x335, 121K)

the iran deal is cringe

never