Twelve year old who was pressured into sending topless photo to online paedophile is told SHE could face charges - while HE remains free
>dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4892500/Schoolgirl-groomed-online-mosque-paedophile-face-charges.html >A 12-year-old British schoolgirl was coerced into sending topless images of herself >An online paedophile bombarded the girl via Instagram demanding the photos >Her horrified mother alerted police and was told her child could face charges >Creating explicit images of a child is illegal even if the person doing so is a child >Police are encouraged to take a common sense approach in such circumstances >The 12 year old girl was ultimately coerced into sending multiple other explicit photos >However after sending an "prolapse" image of herself using an iPad she refused to send more, despite being bombarded with messages by the paedophile. >The girl's horrified mother alerted police and child protection agencies after making the harrowing discovery. >The man's identity and country of origin have been barred from reports by a court ruling designed to protect minority communities.
It is literally fake news though. OP is making up half of what is in the greentext.
Jaxon Evans
>virgin as an insult
is this 1998? Or are you a fat, blue haired feminist? Either way, kill yourself, simian.
Landon Flores
>>The man's identity and country of origin have been barred from reports by a court ruling designed to protect minority communities.
send bobs actually works
Grayson Flores
>prolapse photo Oh lord...
Camden Adams
>>DailyHysteria.co.uk He is triggering over news sites.
Chimp and virgin loser.
Ayden Watson
Based
Juan Smith
What is a prolapse?
Hudson Cooper
You're welcome to Google "anal prolapse" if you haven't eaten in the past hour.
James Williams
Rule, Britannia!
Benjamin Morris
What disturbs me is how a 12 year old would even know what an anal prolapse is to be able to do for the guy on camera.
Cooper Reed
>However after sending an "prolapse" image of herself using an iPad she refused to send more Why? The hardest part was done.
Joseph Gonzalez
What disturbs me is that you instinctively believe this shit
Cameron Cook
I sure didn't know what a prolapse was when I was 12, in fact I didn't know what teabagging was until I was 21 and Democrats decided to, uh, "redpill" us on that.
Jackson Perry
This is proof of why you should never get cops or CPS involved in familial disputes. They're never out to help you, only themselves and they will ruin yours and your family's life in the name of advancing their careers.
Henry Torres
why not? its becoming regular over there as they degrade into a tyranny state that controls the people instead of the criminals
>New technologies in the hands of teens are another route to the registry. In Prince William County, Virginia, two years ago, a 17 year old high school junior sent a sexual video to his teenage girlfriend, and found himself charged with manufacturing and distributing child pornography. The county prosecutor obtained a search warrant to photograph “the erect penis of the defendant.” (Pursuit of the photo was abandoned only after there was a public outcry.) In Fayetteville, North Carolina, a sixteen-year-old girl faced multiple felony charges for “sexting” a picture of herself to her boyfriend. According to the county sheriff’s warrant, she was both the adult perpetrator of the crime at hand—“sexual exploitation of a minor”—and its child victim. Her boyfriend faced similar charges.
>wanting to photograph a teenage boy's erect penis >it's all for evidence purposes, hhonest
Colton Rivera
Most cops are low-IQ individuals who were bullied in school and get into police work so they can get their revenge by power tripping and controlling people.
>23 posts and 13 IP >denmark >mexico >russia posted 2 times >2 brazilians and one of them posted 2 times >2 italians >3 brits >there's likely another american other than OP >this means OP is a samefag trying to push his stupid thread when no one believes his shit OP pls
sadly now that the bbc magazine tripe is on the main website any news story has a big fuckoff sidebar showing off the latest gay trends and gossip about the royals
I dunno who on earth thinks arresting them is a good idea. If I were a cop, I'd think "Y'know, arresting a 12 year old for taking a picture of their butt is just fucking ridiculous. I'm not doing this."
police will always enforce the law no matter how stupid or despotic,
Joseph Garcia
You're assuming that the pigs are actually in it to help the community instead of power and control over other human beings.
Connor Phillips
It's actually easier to get these convictions thrown out than you think. Ever heard of a little thing called jury nullification? They don't want you to know about that.
Kevin Powell
Any cop who does this should be fired and stripped of their pension with no right of appeal.
But it's just logical: underages are tried for various crimes, and cp production is a crime. It's also logical to incarcerate underages for having sex with other underages: rape is rape, even when it is mutual rape.
Angel Barnes
>country that's the third largest CP producer in the world Uh, about that.
Mason Lee
Then praise your cops for fighting that menace in your country.
Leo Richardson
>Making excuses for 12 years roastie thot kys faggot
Xavier Torres
I'm fairly sure in your case it's bydlo producing CP of their kids so they can afford food.
Jonathan Sanders
Then praise the cops from oppost for not allowing same stuff in the West.
This states that that one may not distribute or receive CP across state lines, through the mail, or over a computer network. It also says one may not knowingly distribute or receive CP. That part is where you have a loophole, because of factoring in intent. A 13 year old taking nudes of themselves isn't intending to knowingly produce or distribute CP, quite probably at that age one would not even know what CP is. Obviously some guy photographing himself sodomizing his niece very much is intending to produce CP.
My point is that there's tons of holes in this that a skillful lawyer can point out.
Isaiah Rivera
So lemme get this straight. It's not illegal to have CP on my computer if it never touched the Internet or left my computer and I didn't make it myself. That's what it seems to be saying.
Aaron Gray
I guess technically it would although how you would manage to get CP onto your computer without making it yourself or using the Internet would be a bit hard to figure out.
Noah Sanchez
Also there is nothing in there (that I can see) stating that it is illegal to take nudes of oneself.
Matthew Lopez
Jow Forums--Certified Experts in Criminal Law
Thomas Anderson
>That part is where you have a loophole, because of factoring in intent. A 13 year old taking nudes of themselves isn't intending to knowingly produce or distribute CP, quite probably at that age one would not even know what CP is. That is a very...interesting definition of intent. Are you a law student or what?
Kayden Bell
LOVE IS LOVE LOVE IS BLIND TO GENDER LOVE IS BLIND TO SEXUAL ORIENTATION LOVE IS BLIND TO AGE
Eli Robinson
I'm not, I was just pointing out that if you read USCC 18:2252A the right way, you can easily argue that this particular circumstance does not count as deliberate production and distribution of CP.
