>company is called smart contracts >didn't use a smart contract for their ICO
>uses open source code months ahead of mainnet >someone else is getting a patent for this code
>spends half a year developing a simple .json parser >still only on alpha-net, functional mainnet nowhere in sight
If you bought any of this coin, PLEASE go to your nearest University lab and donate your brain. Scientists have been searching for years to find anti-matter, and the anti-neurons that are firing in that boney peanut you call a skull will be the answer they need.
Why are you cunts OBSESSED with hating Link Marines?
The ABSOLUTE STATE of nolinkers. Buy a few hundred Link, minimum, because life will be insufferable for you when we moon and boast all day on you cunts.
Levi King
>has such a lack of partnerships and connections that it's community has to invent increasingly wilder conspiracies to justify their purchase >meanwhile the top minds of crypto know that a decentralized solution to the oracle problem is pointless
You know nothing, theres been actual insiders on Jow Forums who know how big this will be and youre going to miss out!
Joshua Miller
>most of it's investors are so poor that they NEED to believe that it will reach $1000 in order for them to escape their jobs at the grocery store >in reality LINK almost never has decent moves in value unlike even the most worthless shitcoins >this is dismissed as 'more time to accumulate' but it becomes more obvious as time passes that this time will never end
Somebody spammed this fud consistently and I'm scared, can anyone dispel it? >Assuming you guys get your moon due to wild speculation on 'partnerships'; is a legit company that doesn't have access to OTC LINK really going to buy a highly volatile asset from an unregulated exchange, to be held for X amount of time to pay future fees to node operators? How could a business even accurately budget the amount of LINK they require if the price fluctuates like most crypto? They would need a dedicated, de-centralized, automated, instant, secure and regulated way of exchanging fiat for LINK at the time of fee payment to nodes for any future enterprise adoption after the first round of companies get their link in OTC deals (probably for free). If fees are based in fiat corporate customers will only want to be exposed to LINK price movements for a split-second when they pay operators, not hoard a stack of it. There is no practical way of doing this, especially without incurring even more overall fees for a simple data request. There's a reason SirGay nervously said 'for the time being' when asked if node operators would be paid in LINK and not some other currency like ETH. Sorry stinkies, i just don't see it. $0.1 EOY
Nathan White
>someone else is getting a patent for this code Kek, is this actually possible? Yes, i'm brainlet.
>it's own developers were DESTROYED by a single random ETH redditor and all he had to do was ask the right questions to completely stump the devs, who had no answers to the problems they had never even considered >these and other criticisms are always dismissed with claims of 'fud' without ever addressing the technological or business problems that LINK cannot overcome, even by it's own developers statements and attempted sidesteps (ie 'we're still thinking of a solution to this problem' when flaws in their incentive system were brought to the attention of the community publicly)
