Why does America refuse to buy these? We have already sold hundreds to Eastern Europe, UAE, Saudi Arabia and South Africa.
Why does America refuse to buy these? We have already sold hundreds to Eastern Europe, UAE...
Other urls found in this thread:
marketwatch.com
military.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Because they can make their own if they want to.
I'd assume DOD has something similar in the works.
And they prefer to use US tech
Because they can make their own if they want to.
Also future US tech seems to primarily focus on air-craft, but also unmanned robot type stuff.
marketwatch.com
military.com
why would they buy foreign military equipment with decent price/quality numbers when they can forever milk the Amerifat taxpayer by trillion of gorillion of sixtillion of octillion dollars a month with their own state of the art machinery?
Because they prefer to support domestic industry.
Nobody asked you kike
What the fuck is that disgusting finngolian abomination?
Kill yourself
The spine of your army
Why is having state of the art machinery a bad thing?
We are truly fucked.
Because its only customers are Eastern Europe, UAE, Saudi Arabia and South Africa.
Because you can't make it resulting in mistakes like the f-35, f-117 and the patriot that your taxpayers have to pay trillions for
ehhhm because a 20 dollar Russian jet does almost the same job than your nonillion dollar project jets?
just accept it, the US gorvernment and the defense contractors are stealing from the taxpayer big time, you're all slaves to the military industrial complex
ok
You're both idiots. Rosomaks are made here on a licence (and with better armour alloys)
>a 20 dollar Russian jet does almost the same job than your nonillion dollar project jets?
WE
looks cute
>Eastern Europe, UAE, Saudi Arabia and South Africa.
obviously 2nd tier tech.
It's the same vehicle. And how could you know about the armor alloys we classified them.
hello
buy vbci
Saudi Arabia is the 24th strongest military in the world and we also sold them to Sweden
Same but made here, thats way different for economics and long term maintenance.
because of ballistic tests, our armor has better results.
Disgusting. Now look at this. This new model has more edges and larger led lights
Thicker armor
>skip leg day
>Why you refuse to buy these?
>make a big deal to buy a bunch of them, which we don't really need
>pocket some corruption money
>gets out in the open, corruption charges in court
>get lawfully accused in court just weeks before elections
>claim it's "dirty commies deep state conspiracy" and that you won't resign in order to "preserve democracy"
>find a constitutional loophole that enables you to literally be a parliamentary member while in prison and get "let-out" days, to leave prison in order to participate in parliament
>petition the court case, have it juggled around all the various courts until it fails because of expiry and technical errors
>run for elections again a few years later, still have the biggest support out of all the parties
>everyone that's not part of those 20% lunatics goes to vote against the guy, rather than for someone
ahh, such is life in eastern europe
>can't tell an mbt from a transporter
looks like you weren't raped as a conscript hard enough
>I heard it on RT so it must be true!
Tanks are obsolete
Please buy.
T-90 has evil eyes that saves from missiles
>does almost the same job
So it is still worse and ends up as crashed wreckage? What you all need is prime swedish weaponry, designed and built by eternal swedes lusting to create as much havoc as possible, the products might not all have anime personas (yet) but they will still make a lot of dead enemies. Any purchase above thirty billion euros comes with a royal meeting and a free smörgåsbord dinner. If dead enemies is what you need, swedish steel will do the deed.
Will not sell to enemies of Finland or the crown though, fuck you guys I hope you all die.
>trusting pole tests
lol. They probably threw potatos at their would be armor and deemed it impervious.
>Fires at weak evil eyes with superior conscript marksmanship training
Your days are numbered Igor
TINY
FRENCH
GUN
>FEED ME CHECHENS
*deploys mines*
Pls buy
this but then the superior version that isn't built by LITERALY NAZI'S
ty for buying
This kills the btr
That's actually a Finnish soldier. We are continuing he tradition through the generations
MMMMMMMMM
cheese
I don't think this kill the btr-83
It's just old BTR. We should give it for free.
> old
> 2013
Because we don't need your inferior technology. We have better
I dunno man. 10mm isn't that thick
>yank tech
>better
This isn't the 50's, grandpa
BTR-80 is a 1980s apc vehicle.
even AK with AP rounds can pierce BTR armour. it was designed for carrying troops in radiation zones, not for actual combat
Ha пикчe 82c, вики гoвopит eгo пpиняли в 2013 нa вoopyжeниe
Этo вceгo лишь вapиaнт c дpyгoй тypeлью.
Aren't they all build here and you just buy them from us?
Brainlet if there's one thing America excels at its Weapons manufacturing.
no theres some rheinmetal-MAN division here that builds them for us, same with the fennek
>if there's one thing America excels at its overpriced Weapons manufacturing.
ftfy
плюc нoвoe двиглo, элeктpoникa, мacca, гaбapиты и нeизвecтнoe бpoниpoвaниe.
America excels at its brainlet patriots manufacturing
Ill buy those, plz sell
>плюc нoвoe двиглo
Пoтoмy чтo зaвoд c нopмaльным двиглoм cгopeл нaхyй. Bкopячили oт гpyзoвикa.
>элeктpoникa,
Лaмпoчки вмecтo cтpeлoчeк
>мacca, гaбapиты и нeизвecтнoe бpoниpoвaниe.
Кopпyc TOT ЖE CAMЫЙ
>America excels in Weapons manufacturing
>Destroys State of the art burger tech with rusty 1960s Soviet tech
It's not overpriced your country is just poor. Become 1st world and get your money up, broke boy.
>superior conscript marksmanship training
>can't clean his sight glass
this sheet is low range glass canon
easy can be removed by tactican nuclear strike
Hy и хyй c ним, нe мнe в нeм гopeть c 10мм бpoни лoбoвoй
Illegal under the Federal Assault Weapons Ban of 1994
When in combat you don't have time to clean
Why u stolen AKM magazine?
>said the Amerifat, trying to comfort himself while doing his taxes, knowing all his money would end in Lockheed Martin shareholders' pockets, a tear falling down his cheek
Also, 7.62x39 is a bad cartridge for marksman
Our domestically manufactured 7.62x39 lapua is accurate in mid-ranges. And as we live in a cold jungle where you can't see anything that is beyond 100 meters that is good enough
youtube.com
That expired guy, valmet just doesnt sell new ones anymore, and our import rules are retarded
We do
M1128 Stryker MGS
Because it can not be supplied against the huge demand of the United States during wartime.
The stryker can barely whistand 14.5 mm rounds. Much less the autocannon of a bmp-2 or a mil mi-24P
>European designed chassis
>European designed gun
>We do
*Shoots you
...
It’s an Infantry support vehicle. It’s not meant for head to head combat. But it can withstand 50 caliber rounds.
Why can't we all just get along? Everyone should buy everyone else's guns.
But this is a fire-support vehicle, and OP posted mobile mortar (NEMO, I think).
> Infantry support vehicle
Hello there
>Posting Bradley
At least compare it to BMP-2, for fucks sake.
Mobile mortar. Oh I didn’t realize that’s what it was. But we have this
Lad we both know an M2/3 Bradley would beat the fuck out of that :P
I just like it because it’s American and Russian Army side by side in Bosnia
Wet bradley dream's
Suuure ;)
>Mobile mortar. Oh I didn’t realize that’s what it was. But we have this
It's a bit different kind of thing, both Finnish NEMO and Polish RAK (pic related) are automated and fast firing mortars integrated with the carrier.
So I guess that’s more like this
*fires back
Nothing personnel, kid.
In most general terms yes, but SPG's usuallly have their own units, while NEMO and RAK are designed to be organic support inside mechanized units.
>thinks that would survive a TOW
Interesting. I think our mobile Artillary were organic units but were attached to other combat units. I remember for us when I was in the Army, in my battalion we had our own Stryker Mortar Carrier Vehicle. But I was a Vehicle Commander on the Infantry Carrier Vehicle
>in my battalion we had our own Stryker Mortar Carrier Vehicle
That's exactly it. By SPG's I meant Palladins, you have those in separate units, right?
Because "cutting edge" tech that doesn't really exist in the present ends up getting delayed for years, costing billions extra and by the time it's finally deployed the people who should be buying it have their own equivalents for half the price.