who are the good guys and who are the bad guys?
In the story of human history
good guys: britain and portugal
bad guys: france germany japan america russia and spain
bad guy: england
good guys: everyone else
remove english dogs from the premises
Bad guys: Anglos, Krauts (including Schnitzelkrauts and Bergjuden)
Good guys: Everyone else
Anglos are the protagonists of history
truth nuke
>Anglos
Are Americans included in that?
If so, go fuck yourself.
>Brits
>Anglo
Brits are inbred island Normans and thus French.
Good: France and America
Bad: Germany and the United Kingdom
>When Mahatma Gandhi launched his campaign of peaceful resistance, Churchill raged that he "ought to be lain bound hand and foot at the gates of Delhi, and then trampled on by an enormous elephant with the new Viceroy seated on its back." As the resistance swelled, he announced: "I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion." This hatred killed. To give just one, major, example, in 1943 a famine broke out in Bengal, caused – as the Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen has proved – by the imperial policies of the British. Up to 3 million people starved to death while British officials begged Churchill to direct food supplies to the region. He bluntly refused. He raged that it was their own fault for "breeding like rabbits". At other times, he said the plague was "merrily" culling the population.
t. good guy
>Rummel estimated that American forces committed around 5,500 intentional democidal killings between 1960 and 1972, from a range of between 4,000 and 10,000 for just recorded massacres.[24] The true extent of deliberate killings committed by US forces is largely unknown. Estimates for the number of North Vietnamese civilian deaths resulting from US bombing range from 50,000–65,000.[2] Other estimates place the number of civilian deaths caused by American bombing of North Vietnam in just Operation Rolling Thunder at 182,000.[25] Although information is sparse, American bombing in Cambodia is estimated to have killed between 40,000 and 150,000 civilians and combatants.[26][27]
>18.2 million gallons of Agent Orange, some of which was contaminated with Dioxin, was sprayed by the U.S. military over more than 10% of Southern Vietnam,[30] as part of the U.S. herbicidal warfare program, Operation Ranch Hand, during the Vietnam War from 1961 to 1971. Vietnam's government claimed that 400,000 people were killed or maimed as a result of after effects, and that 500,000 children were born with birth defects.[31]
t. good guy
>The 1953 Iranian coup d'état, known in Iran as the 28 Mordad coup d'état (Persian: کودتای ۲۸ مرداد), was the overthrow of the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in favour of strengthening the monarchical rule of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi on 19 August 1953, orchestrated by the United Kingdom (under the name "Operation Boot") and the United States (under the name TPAJAX Project[5] or "Operation Ajax").[6][7][8][9]
>Following the coup in 1953, a government under General Fazlollah Zahedi was formed which allowed Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the last Shah of Iran (Persian for an Iranian king),[21] to rule more firmly as monarch. He relied heavily on United States support to hold on to power.[10][11][12][22] According to the CIA's declassified documents and records, some of the most feared mobsters in Tehran were hired by the CIA to stage pro-Shah riots on 19 August. Other CIA-paid men were brought into Tehran in buses and trucks, and took over the streets of the city.[23]
t. good guy
The people who are intelligent and kind and the people who aren't. Not super hard to figure out.
>good guys
innocent brown people
>bad guys
evil ameriKKKans
Anglos are the antagonist of history
unironically this
butt hurt nazi
>it's ok when we do it :^)
That's very Amerifat mind; goods against bads. In that case USA, with all their past of violence, invasions, espionage, injustice and stupidity they can not be the good ones.
good guys: people who created systems of morality
bad guys: people who the good guys didn't like
>bad guys
jews
>good guys
everyone else
>good guys
Countries that generally kept to themselves and made advancements in civilization. Didn't aggressively attack others or start wars throughout their history including USA, Russia, and China
>bad guys
Most of the Euros with extensive colonial empires: Spain, Britain, France, Italy, Germany, etc. Portuguese semi-exempt they generally traded and tried to do things diplomatically.
Merchants. Shills.
Mongols. Mongol empire.
Good post
>Didn't aggressively attack others or start wars throughout their history including USA, Russia, and China
nice b8 m8
Remember kids, the nazis were evil though because MUH DEMOCRACY
these things don't mean the Nazis weren't evil though
>Didn't aggressively attack others or start wars throughout their history
>including USA, Russia, and China
Yes I am aware of that, I was trying to point out the irony of the allies who called themselves humanists and painted the nazis as absolute evil when they did this shit themselves
USA certainly did declare wars, but it was way less compared to others. We run the world for a reason: because the world accepts us as the best option.
>China
Spent centuries telling cunts to keep out and literally built the biggest wall to keep them out. Only after euros bullied it did it adopt more aggressive foreign political ideology.
>Russia
Didn't start the Napoleonic, WW, or WW2. But certainly tried it's part to end those conflicts. Sure it bullied a few cunts, but a lot less than the genocides committed by the colonial europeans.
>Americans unironically believe themselves the good guys
t. irrelevant guy
What are you getting at? You're point was "Didn't aggressively attack others or start wars throughout their history" and all the countries you listed have done that. If you want to argue that those countries did it less, than sure. But you cannot make the statement of none of those countries listed aggressively started wars.
t. relevant because of the misery inflicted upon others
Pinochet, pls
Americans are Anglo Kraut mutts (+ other mutts but since they're good guys it counts as a positive)
(-1)(-1)(1) = 1 which means we're good
Pinochet sucked Kissinger's mutilated cock. You can trace almost every problem back to the US
But Chile is the only good country in South America
USA didn't become relevant until we saved the world from the krauts, nazis, and then save it again from the commies.
Enjoy still existing or not being a commie.
No pride in being the best of the retards.
Chile was fine before the coup. The truck drivers were getting paid by the US to stoo delivering resources to the whole country. All because our president happened to be socialist. After the coup, Chile turned into a guinea pig, your economists experimented with this country. And now see the results. Chile is "fine" in outside terms, but the people are struggling with a shitty life filles with crime and reggaeton blasting retards.
I'll give you the effort USA did to stoo thise menaces, but it was a team work
>Good guys
France and America
>bad guys
Everyone else.
Just deal with it.
> good guys
Workers, farmers
> bad guys
Aristocrats, bourgeoisie, class enemies
>good guys
everyone
>bad guys
fucking ICELAND
Good guys:
Netherlands, USA, France
Bad guys:
Germany, UK, Russia, Japan
Neutral:
India, China
Wildlife:
Africa, South Africa
>good guys
everyone else
>bad guys
anglos
"it depends"
>Good guys:
>Netherlands
yeah nah