American schoolkids have to recite the pledge of allegiance each and everyday at school

>american schoolkids have to recite the pledge of allegiance each and everyday at school
>school shooting occurs when this is going on
>get shot after reciting the pledge
>"thoughs and prayers dog bless"
>gun debate sparks up
>"LIBRULS KILL'EM"
>PRAISE JEEBUS FOR OUR FREEDOM
>repeat
AND THE LAND OF THE
BRAVE

Attached: 1526780744255.jpg (912x707, 132K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Australian_constitutional_crisis
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

You're more likely to die by a random drive by shooting than get killed at school.
Time to look at statistics.

Lets ban gun like france so they wont shoot up... Oh
Lets ban guns like germany so...oh

Oh dear..

Cringe

>1st world country
>frequent drive by shootings like in a shithole led by drug cartels
Can't make this shit up

Attached: FB_IMG_1522191072783.jpg (480x456, 25K)

Yeah, it was pretty cringe when all those kids got their brains blown out at the paris massacre and liberals blamed islamophobia for it.

Italy has gangs too. stfu

What's your point? France has strict gun laws. This deters potential shooters from getting a gun. Otherwise you'd see school shootings in France every other day like in the USA. The Paris massacre was just only one event.
Also, >le libruls xDD

point is, criminals can get guns if they want them. Easily. A recent experiment by swedish newspaper aftonbladet showed their journalist with zero contacts could get hand grenades and ak47s in just a few houra in malmö.
School shootings are not a gun problem, its a cultural and societal problem. American culture is degenerate and many kids turn to violence, escapism like drugs or vidya or mass murder.
A gun is a usefull tool for many purposes. But first and foremost as a restrainer on governmental tyranny. Meme all you want about how the american military has way more firepower than a civilian, but the armed population of america could overthrow the government at any point through sheer manpower alone.
Self defense, especilly in a nation as "diverse" as america is also a necessity

>1st world country
>NORTHERN LEAGUE IN GOV'T
Can't make that shit up either

>i fell down the stairs and broke my leg
>might as well break all my other bones since it's broken now anyway

Like I said before, those laws DETER potential shooters from getting guns. Take a look at Australia. Port Arthur massacre in 1996, stricter gun laws, no mass shootings since, and most importantly, no tyrannical governments that Amerifats fear so much.

>Americans think this is an accomplishment

>But first and foremost as a restrainer on governmental tyranny.
A few AR-15s and hunting rifles are not going to be very effective against the US government, or even a local police force.

We did have one recently accually but it was a weird rural family thing. Where there's tons of guns and drugs

You realize a tyranicall government doeant spring up over night?
Maybe its all fine and dandy over in your irrelevant shithole of a country, but in the west our liberties are getting more and more trampled on by radical marxists.
you are just a pussy with no backbone who wants daddy government to wipe your ass.
When daddy government gives you the whip, dont come crying to me, paco.

the chad post

Off yourself you oversensitive piece of shit.
>AAAAAAH SOMEONE DISAGREES WITH ME MY WESTERN ASS IS ON FIRE
Lmao fucking pathetic. I hope your country collapses asap.

I already adressed that in the very post you quoted. Learn to read, amerimutt.
By shear force of numbers alone the armed civilian population would smash the the US government.
Either way, it definetly acts as a detterant. No politician would risk all out civil war just to satisfy some no backbone having cucked s0yboy piece of shit.

>republicans think this is an accomplishment

fix that for you

they only exist for killing wh*Tes which aren't considered people in italy (based)

based sweed

gun violence is at an all time high in the US, but so is gun regulation

like Muhammad said, this is a societal and cultural problem. But not because of degeneracy or escapism or even violence in itself.

The real problem is with Americans losing their sense of solidarity. Children recite the pledge of allegiance everyday at school to remind them of the culture and history they share. These days however its common to reject american culture, history and traditional way of life. Hell,its even encouraged from educators to common street rats.

when you feel no solidarity with your peers, you see them as less than human.

you have several assumptions and misunderstandings about revolution and america.
first of all there are little to no revolutions that are strictly the people vs the governments, a society is divided in class, sometimes ethnicities and ideologies and that is especially the case in a federation containing 325 millions like America, and almost all revolutions are civil wars opposing two sides of a society.
If an armed uprising were to take place in America, arming the population is equivalent to arming both sides of the conflict.

Not only that, but in a lot of successful evolutions such as the French revolution, British, Turk, the people usually ally all or part of the military, and it's through the military that democracy is established. Arming the people alienates them from the military, you can see that right now from the distance the police and the people have in the US compared to most first world countries : both are scared of one another.

third and last, you assume the civilians would overwhelm the army, but as i said, the civilians are divided, only a fraction of America would take part in the uprising.

>gun violence is at an all time high in the US, but so is gun regulation
Yeah let's just pretend the early 90's didn't exist.

The prefferable outcome would be for a fracturing of ethnicities, political pursations and cultures. And prefferably, affter that, a split america divided into some 20 or so states.
It is the melting pot that is to blame for 90% of americas societal problems.

*snap*

>no tyrannical governments
uhh... sweety....
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Australian_constitutional_crisis