Why communists still exist?
Why communists still exist?
Shit like this
dissatisfied people
im not a communist but thats why theres tons of polarisation
Lots of people under the age of 21
Why do Nazis still exist?
Why something like that? Bezos didn't use money his family already had to acquire more money. He had to sell like 20% of it for only 20 million dollars to those kinds of people back when he was first starting. Right now that he only owns 17% of Amazon even though he did all the work building it.
entitled jealous utopianists exist in every age.
>It will trickle down guys! I promise!
The very first thing about marxism is a critique of utopian socialism.
The real reason is because it's a rational response to a structural analysis of capitalism. Unless capitalism changes radically communism can't go away.
Forgot to say-
but since you can't just magically *know* these things within yourself without studying- very few angry reactionary teenagers on Jow Forums will understand. It's infinitely easier to accept the anticommunist memes spoonfed to you by paid agents of the owner class like jordan peterson or ben shapiro.
DONT FELL INTO C*MMUNISM FAGGOTS
LOOK AT RUSSIA
NOTHING GOOD HERE NOW
Russia was BETTER back when it was communist though. It got bad after we introduced capitalism.
the CCCP had a higher standard of living than modern oligarchical russhit
Communism will make bigger problems
DIE C*MMIES
Today's Russia is better because it is weaker.
Why wouldn't they? It's never been tried before and really looking at the facts its hard to think how it could be worse than capitalism.
What exactly is wrong with this?
>CCCP
A fucking major nation, with huge sphere of influence
>Rus
Third world shithole, barely relevant
Jow Forums false flags please be less obvious
jews still exist
Also the memes are untrue
>innocent communists
YEAH KILLEM
>with huge sphere of influence
Kept solely through selling guns. USSR managed to play the superpower game only through sheer deception of its own capabilities.
Don't you have a garbage can to eat out of?
In what way is selling guns to your allies "fake" power?
Ever see a gun improve infrastructure?
He never claimed that. The whole "trickle down" thing was invented by journalists that were triggered by his presidency much like they are today with Trump.
The term was never discussed between real economists and remains as one of the longest running strawman arguments.
>The real reason is because it's a rational response to a structural analysis of capitalism
t. brainlet
>dude just overthrow all the governments of the world and start socialism, come on dude it's just that easy
The USSR was more respectable than modern day Russia. I can only imagine you are some oligarch's retarded son to equate blindly praise capitalism after the fiasco that was the 90s Shock reforms.
Go slave away for some ethically bankrupt megacorp like Amazon for 55 hours a week while your CEO makes tens of millions every day, and you'll understand.
Because they haven't been educated enough.
How is that different from communism?
GRRRR MAN HAVE MONEY
you see comrade, you have choice of packing boxes for walmart or amazon compnany
No idea what you wanted to express there.
Not an argument
>REEEE WHY DO PEOPLE HAVE OPINIONS I DONT LIKE
why do tankieshits always enter threads and immediately reply to half a dozen people with some incoherent screeching?
Don't @ me
The posts he was replying to were literally incoherent screeching you fucking moron
Why are you referring to yourself in third person? Do you have brain problems?
Because thankfully there still exist some rational people.
Because contradictions of capitalism still exist.
You don't see an issue in this?
They get fooled by pretty ideals, not realizing that in practice it's a nightmare.
All of them were self made.
No issue. Name one invention made by Africa used daily by people.
>3 phrases of a Jewish state
There's no job worth $75 billion
These people do nothing but eating lunch with their rich friends and media interviews
They spent decades building their company in order for it to become that valuable. Theyr weren't born rich so everyone else had the same opportunity. The best part is you dont have to buy anything from any of them if you dont want to in the first place.
No. Resources are always going to get concentrated. I prefer they get concetrated according to market domination instead of party allegiance.
Also
>more than 3.6 billion poorest people
Poorest people breed like rats in those parts of the world. Add inflation, how the banking system works and you've got a statistic that doesn't say anything objective but is good for convincing gullible high-schoolers/college freshman to join the " I want money for nothing" club.
because mental illness still exists
Because notion of solidarity of the strong with the weak, of equality among human beings and a common good is an appealing one, as is notion of shifting responsibility and blame onto someone else, and nobody wants to see themselves as a monster that enables purges, murder, torture and oppression of innocents, or admit to being driven by envy, greed, sloth and hypocrisy.
You dodge all my standpoints
Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Resources can be concentrated without people having more money they can ever spend while others are starving to death.
>>All of them were self made.
What about all those employees that he hired?
Actually communism did do a relatively good job of deconcentrating wealth. Even the top dignitaries didn’t have such disproportionate access to opulence as in capitalism. The real problem was the disenfranchisement, ideological violence and systemic abuse of power.
And what's wrong with that? Resentful much?
yes
because the labour market is so saturated now. You have to be an enthusiastic hard working person with qualifications, experience and enthusiasm for customer service who already is an expert on the job even though theres no training for it to even be on the list of 10+ people they'll consider
Not a single issue. If you care so much about other why don't you live frugally below your means and donate most of your disposable income to people in struggling nations? It should be your own choice, not forced upon you
¡El diablo!
Because young and stupid people who think they already know what's good for everyone will always exist
>"self-made"
No, most of them were tech first movers taking advantage of the near-monopolistic advantages being a first mover in tech gave them, thanks to network effects and the fact that there were few of the laws that inhibit established/mature industries.