Serious blockstream shill discussion thread.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Do you guys think that those retards trying to spread fud about BCH are actually paid shills? Here's my list of assumptions going from most likely to least likely:
>Most likely
They are literal retards and 15 year olds who have no friends, so getting an imaginary pat on the back by the "popular" trolls feels like belonging to a community. Little do they know that most fud accounts weren't even real, but thankfully these kids are poor as shit so they can't move the market anyway
>second most likely
There's still paid blockstream shills on here alongside the retards
>less likely
They are also cashies who want to exaggerate how dumb corekeks are. In reality, BCH FUD threads to indeed turn into something positive for Satoshi's vision, because anyone can read how every corekek is a retard and cashies are overall reasonable people with good arguments. It's unlikely though, because it assumes intellingence in corekeks, and if they were even mildly intelligent, they wouldn't be corekeks.
Serious blockstream shill discussion thread
I am sure that there are *some* paid shills. there is nothing stopping it, so someone will be doing it.
But most of the interested masses will have just chosen "their" team by some arbitrary coincidence, and now be defending their "own teams" position in any way they can because "we are good and they are bad" Simple tribal mind. This effects people of any age, look at middle aged sports fans and how strong their commitment is to local football team X. Meanwhile one state over, an almost identical group of boomers are strongly believing that their local team Y is superior in all regards.
Nothing wrong with this, commitment to a causes and fighting and losing are necessary for the process of evolution. The team that is more fit-for-purpouse will win most of the time.
Everyone who cares about freedom chooses BCH
There's certainly tribal behavior on both sides.
But calling out fraud for what it is doesn't need paid shills or tribal behavior.
Selling someone Bitcoin Cash and claiming it's Bitcoin is fraud.
>It took 6 years to have that baby
>Selling someone Bitcoin Cash and claiming it's Bitcoin is fraud.
Bullshit
Selling someone btc (a ponzi) and claiming it's bitcoin is fraud.
There's tons of online material explaining how bitcoin is revolutionary technology which allows p2p cash payments. If someone buys BTC based on this information, aren't they defrauded? If they buy BCH based on it, they aren't, because it follows everything that has been said about bitcoin 2009-2015.
You don't know what a Ponzi is.
Bitcoin is still Bitcoin which Satoshi Nakamoto published in the whitepaper. Specifically, it's the majority chain which has the most PoW invested into it.
Bitcoin Core is a client that runs on the Bitcoin network, and has some non-breaking "upgrades" which allow additional features which do not upset the behavior of all other well-behaved clients on the Bitcoin network.
A Bitcoin Cash client literally won't run on the Bitcoin network because all of the well-behaved clients, following Bitcoin's rules and mining the majority PoW chain will reject their blocks.
>board relentlessly astroturfed by bcashies seeminlgy appearing out of nowhere
>bcash is bitcoin! Ver is a chad! Blockstream ponzi! Corekeks! Core S.o ys!
>some people reply in one of the 17 bch threads in catalog in favor of bitcoin
>shills! Paid corekek 14 year old shills!!
It is not going to work Ver. Nobody fucking comes to biz anyway its all shills and sock-puppets
>blockstream shill
Why do you think there are blockstream shills here, but not paid BCH shills?
First of all, none of them work on a 2009 client, good luck using segwit on one, lol.
Second, I know exactly what a ponzi is. BTC is one - it has no value other than the hope that someone else will buy at a higher price.
BTC from 2013 was not a ponzi, because instead of speculating on someone being dumb enough to pay more for useless internet tokens, people were speculating on future adoption, which would naturally create a price bottom.
I've been explaining to normans why BTC isn't a ponzi on a daily basis 2012-2016, but nowadays I'm out of arguments, because kikestream literally destroyed all my arguments.