WHY Jow Forums ??? They could have fucking done it.
They could have destroyed the eternal anglo ONCE AND FOR ALL.
But nooooooooooo that fucking dipshit with his retarded mustache had to doom the world AGAIN to the britbongs by invading Russia, why the fuck did that mongoloid do that?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
stop being autistic
What makes you think they could have pulled off the invasion of Britain even without invading Russia
gg no re
Бeлapycь, ты?
The fact that Britain got its teeth kicked in in epic fashion and if Adolf wasn't fond of your Empire he'd not have ordered his troops to LITERALLY LET YOU LEAVE WITHOUT ATTACKING like you know, what actually happened?
The only reason you were able to retreat to your shitty rainy island is because uncle Adolfie allowed you to. He should've destroyed you there and then - but he didn't - but he actually could (back then at that moment).
Also - if you don't know what battle specifically I'm talking about you don't deserve to be in this thread (not with that flag at least).
cuck
Hitler's war effort was always primarily directed against the USSR. The Nazis admired the British Empire
>if you're not a Nazi you're Antifa
>unironically thinking Hitler was right
kys
>They could have fucking done it
>They could have destroyed the eternal anglo ONCE AND FOR ALL
Rich Jews from London and NY has convinced him to destroy poor Jews in Poland and Ukraine first.
Hitler could not have won. Evil never wins.
God didnt allow to punish mankind for their sins
Where's his chin? It's probably people that photograph themselves before surgery
>calls out evil
>makes fun of the mass murder of civilians
nice logic
its not mass murder if the 'victim' is evil
Big if true
kys
He could never have crossed the Channel even if he wanted to, the Battle of Britain was a failure from the German perspective.
A German invasion of the British Isles was infeasable because the Germans had no fucking navy of note
The notion that Hitler "Allowed" the BEF to escape is also false, It was the Generals that ordered the halt of the Panzer armies on their way to Dunkirk due to their interpretation of the theatre at the time, Thanks to a counterattack at Arras coupled with the tanks running off from the Infantry
>Evil never wins.
>Where's his chin?
Taken by supreme aryan genetics. Sieg heil
well, the Allies did evil things too, but overall the Axis was without question worse
Yes, evil never wins.
He let 300k of your best man escape when they were completely encircled in hopes of achieving peace, only for you to firebomb civilians
They could have exterminated the niggers in the colonies
We took a chance to get out because your generals misread the battle and inadvertently gave us time we needed.
Reap the whirlwind :)
Nope
Are you implying that Japan didn't do evil things across Asia during WW2? They wholeheartedly deserved that
Fact of the matter is Germany fucked up, and allowing us to retain the bulk of our army meant that from that point onward an invasion of the British Isles was impossible
2 world wars and 1 world cup
Yeah like I said he wanted peace. He fucked up because he assumed anglos were human
dude crying about Allied strategic bombing when you're not mentioning what we did first is kinda retarded
yes it was evil, but we did the same and much worse
If he wanted peace then he wouldn't have started the fucking war in the first place
pointless to argue with dindus like him
800 dead civilians. Not even comparable.
He wanted peace with England from the start. You don't know what you're talking about
>800 dead civilians. Not even comparable.
Dutch wasn't in the war for 6 years, they were in for like 2 weeks
and we killed hundreds of thousands of Soviets with strategic bombing, and millions by other means
>He wanted peace with England from the start.
he wanted to be left alone conquering and bullying even though the British made clear they wouldn't accept that. He wanted war.
Ffs you have to own up to that, what's so hard about that?
>But nooooooooooo that fucking dipshit with his retarded mustache had to doom the world AGAIN to the britbongs by invading Russia, why the fuck did that mongoloid do that?
Agree.
how can you hate this?
youtube.com
Why do people always underestimate Britain
because historically they couldn't do much on the continent without allies and people like to forget how important the navy is in NAVAL invasions
Didn't the Germans want to invade Britain with no surface fleet
German invasion plans were never anything serious
We didn't start WW2 expecting to even get the chance to invade Britain, we planned for another long-term war in France
Operation Sealion was hastily improvised and never more than a pipe dream, which is why it was quickly blown off by Hitler
I was under the impression it was blown off because the Luftwaffe failed to significantly degrade the RAF's capability
>Dutch wasn't in the war for 6 years, they were in for like 2 weeks
Because of >and we killed hundreds of thousands of Soviets with strategic bombing, and millions by other means
I'm not excusing that.
>he wanted to be left alone conquering and bullying
You have no idea what you're talking about. Ever wondered why Britain only declared war on us when we partitioned Poland with the SU?
Probably because after Poland we realised that you wouldn't abide by any deals or sanctions
Yes Germans failed to get the air superiority they needed, but also they didn't really have any proper landing ships to do the invasion with.
it was blown off before the Battle of Britain was over, but you're right, aircraft losses helped in the decision. Both the generals and Hitler simply realized it was completely unrealistic
>Ever wondered why Britain only declared war on us when we partitioned Poland with the SU?
because Germany was a greater threat to them and their defense alliance with Poland only went for a German invasion. They weren't allied out of kindness, they wanted to contain German aggression. You probably believe this is somehow unjust... fucking deluded
Speaking of air superiority, the Brewster Buffalo flown by Finland was one of (if not) the most successful fighters of the war in terms of pure kill/death ratio
I've always felt a bit guilty about the bombing of Germany to be honest. It's probably cause I read Slaughterhouse-Five when I was young. Some of the accounts from survivors are really terrible stuff.
On the other hand, they had levelled Coventry, London, Sheffield, lobbing huge bottle rockets at us the entire war, that had no military purpose, the Germans were only less effective for lack of means, not motive. I don't know what to make of it really.
>I've always felt a bit guilty about the bombing of Germany to be honest
That's dumb.
the strategic impact on the military effort is debatable. It was undoubtedly evil, and I think Harris should've been hanged for it. But at least it had SOME worth for the war effort, meanwhile what Nazi Germnay did to many civlians in their own territory was completly pointless and even detrimental to the war effort.
>feelling bad about the murder of civilians is dumb
He could just have bombed it to the ground. But he didn't.
I feel bad that people died obviously, but it was a war that the Germans started. And you bombed the shit out of us first. My sympathy has limits.
War is never nice for anyone. You don't need to decide which side is more worthy of your pity, just look at all victims with the empathy they deserve without ignoring the historical meaning and necessity of military action.
Don't get me wrong, I can't say they didn't have it coming. We never had any answer to all the terrible German zeppelin raids from the Great War. And I can understand the logic in bringing the war to a fast conclusion.
I think I just don't have the stomach for war, full stop. The loss of so much life is heartbreaking to me.
>He could just have bombed it to the ground.
He couldn't even manage that lmao,
Germany had pretty much nothing in the way of strategic bombers and the RAF did a good enough job of shooting them down. To the point that they started lobbing rockets instead since we had a harder time doing that
yeah as the British user said that's not true, look up the Battle of Britain
British air defense was excellent and I heard their aircraft production even exceeded ours
>Germany had pretty much nothing in the way of strategic bombers
this is a misconception though, we didn't lack the equipment, what we lacked were resources of all kind (oil, manpower, food, metals, rubber etc etc)
Weren't the rockets just a large waste of money and too inaccurate to hit anything important?
>we didn't lack the equipment, what we lacked were resources of all kind
This is true, but you did lack strategic bombers, almost certainly down to production issues, since you guys were stuck with the He-111 through most of the war, and even lost a fair chunk of them during the Staligrad airlift
>nazis
>innosent people
Nobody is innocent.
we had a strategic bomber (pic related, He 177)
over 1000 were built, but initial versions had bad engine problems. It came too late and when it was introduced we bombers weren't what was needed anymore, so fighters and tanks were given precendence. Though we had working prototypes that were on the level of the B-29
>all Germans were Nazis
>Killing 10 people isn't bad, because others have killed even more
In terms of WWII bomber that's practically nothing, the He-177 and the Fw-200 were too late and not needed, German production priority was a bit all over the place for the entire war, but then again the Allies mostly had an advantage of factories that weren't being blown to kingdom come every week
thing about the nukes was that they ended the war, so they at least served a purpose. It was evil, but saying "evil prevailed" because of that is dishonest. Even though both sides did nasty stuff, if we're talking about which side was the bad one, it's pretty clearly the Axis.
yeah you're right (tho Fw-200 wasn't really a dedicated bomber, only really used against shipping)
Wasn't the Fw-200 intended to be used to strike America?
Also why didn't the Luftwaffe retire the Bf-109 after the G-6 (I know WHY but I'm still asking because the Fw-190 was far superior)
In view of the fact that 1944 was the most productive year in the German armaments industry, with many new models in series production, and the highest output of armaments in absolute terms, the efficiency of the bombings must be doubted. Especially since the British focused on terrorist attacks against the civilian population. It was supposed to shake morale, but had the opposite effect.
...
I'm not talking about production figures though, I mean in priority of what they were churning out,
Germany kept upgrading the Bf-109 past what was practical in reality, plus making Tiger IIs and meme projects like the STG-44 which had very little positive strategic impact meant that they had less factories making easier, quicker and cheaper stuff like more Pz IVs, which were good enough to deal with Shermans and T-34s
nah Fw 200 was actually a passenger plane, it just had a long range and was therefore suitable for spotting & bombing warships. It didn't have the range to reach america and didn't have the payload to be used as a bomber against land targets either
and we didn't retire the Bf 109 because it was still competitive in some regards and constantly upgraded (I think it had the best rate of climb even at the end of the war or something). anyhow the main reason was that many factories were already made to produce it and it was good enough. I personally love the machine
and Fw 190s weren't superior in all regards until the late versions with new motors were introduced in 1944
yeah but that increase was more due to Speer's reforms and the final (far too late coming) shift to full wartime economy than anything
ofc the British intended to terrorize, but the bombings did have impacts on production (not on morale though, you're righ on that)
The Fw-190 was a superior low alt fighter to the Bf-109 and even the earlier ones were formidable high alt fighters due to their terrifiyng dive speeds. The Bf-109 by the end of the war was quite fankly pitiful against it's Allied competition, even the spitfire was running rings around it at high alt
that's a misconception of yours
German weapons were good enough, and the later introduced models were often easier to produce than previous models (Panther was far simpler than Tiger for example)
also the Pz IV was outdated and barely kept up anymore and the Bf 109 was good enough
StG 44 was excellent and actually not expensive or harder to produce than normal bolt action rifles, and Tiger II was an ok heavy tank
what was the problem were the critical lack of all kinds of resources plus the resulting shitty logistics
really? Even the G and K versions?
Probably because it was very difficult during the war to install completely new production lines in existing factories without a decline in arms production during this period (perhaps months?)?
Sure they had. This can be seen, for example, in the fact that all armaments were increasingly produced, only not submarines and other naval units. Once the shipyard has been destroyed, it can no longer be repaired as quickly as other facilities.
Only thing I can't understand is how the post war stuff in Britain happend.
Why did they loose all colonies?
How did the nanny state happen?
Where did the political capital end up? If you just won a war you should end up with more power than before.
Where did they get that many immigrants from in a 70 year timespan?
>Why did they loose all colonies?
they were completely bankrupt after both world wars and lacked the political will to fight against decolonization demands coming from the colonies themself and the new world powers USSR and US
>Where did they get that many immigrants from in a 70 year timespan?
from the former empire
Because the British made their own values become reality.
Perhaps one should learn from the Romans at the point when full civil rights were only held by Romans.
The G and the K versions especially, they needed MW50 injection to remain competitive with Allied fighters at 30,000 feet
Imagine how the ground must have been shaking when these monsters passed by
>Why did they loose all colonies?
they were too broke to hold on to most of their large colonies.
>How did the nanny state happen?
a hold-over from the post war economy. Central planning and cradle to grave system was seen as the most efficient system
>Why did they loose all colonies?
As the other lad pointed out, bankruptcy. Both the wars completely drained us. Then the Yanks cucked us in Suez and that was that.
>How did the nanny state happen?
XD
>Where did the political capital end up? If you just won a war you should end up with more power than before.
America won.
>Where did they get that many immigrants from in a 70 year timespan?
Former colonies like Jamaica.
Well, the aim of the rockets was to inflict terror, they could at best target something like a city, when they still had pads at Normandy they could perhaps hit something like the docks at Portsmouth if they were lucky. The massive advantage was that you would never risk any air crew to anti-air fire.
Whether they were a waste of money I can't say. You could make that case for all sorts of things on both sides. The Americans mustn't've thought so because they were already reverse-engineering and building copies of the V-1 before the war was even over. The V-2 is what eventually put the first US astronaut into space.
ah ok
I was under the impression that they were inferior after ~1941 but still ok in the hands of experienced pilots (which we also lacked desperately with the war going on)
70 ton fuckers
in hindsight they were definitely a waste of money, the program was stupidly expensive for miniscule military gain
but it greatly advanced rocketry and the space age, I guess at least something positive came out from these years...
Not physically exterminating ethnic Germans in 1945 was a mistake on our part. These people are arguably the most disgusting ethnic group I've ever encountered. Authoritarian, sadistic, bossy, entitled, power-hungry, narrow-minded, hyper-materialistic, unable to feel and express empathy, hyper-stingy, xenophobic, lacking sense of humour, unimaginative, backstabbing. German people are pure cancer.
This.
(you)
Most of those sound like descriptors of russians.
wtf I hate r*ssians now
Get lost.
How well-known is Slaughterhouse Five in Europe?
Go invade some weak neighbor or bomb some civilians my dear innocent Russia
Obviously you're free of any guilt because dead people did bad stuff 75 years ago
>innocent civvies in Afganistan and Iraq
>HAHA YEAH KILLEM
Your nation should have been wiped out completely for your psychopathic behavior throughout the last century. We can only blame Soviet humanism for not eradicating your sadistic homicidal tribe from the surface of the Earth.
Salty Ruski