Wilson 6/10

>Khrushchev 6/10

CORN

Except he still let Europeans draw the borders of the middle east, and he sure didn't care much about "national self-determination" when it came to European colonial rule.

this

This

Looking at the list of prime ministers I'm a little disappointed in myself that I don't know more about them. I have enjoyed learning about history for a long time, but I've never looked much into how the different governments have differed in terms of policy.

t. libcuck

Also Wilson was the only reason pretty much that Albania survived and wasn't instantly partitioned by all of their neighbors.

got any issue with that?

Attached: gettyimages-604208254.jpg (2000x1331, 618K)

Since he rates all presidents pre-LBJ highly and all afterwards low, he's more likely some Jow Forumsfag who thinks the Jews took over America in 1965 or something.

I'm a brainlet so I don't know all of them. There are way too many anyway...

I only know Hindenburg, Hitler, Pieck, Ulbricht, Honecker, Schröder, Merkel

Basically all of them suck for different reasons

>liberals are the cucks
>when conservatives support politicians who want to rob them blind
Nope, a liberal/socdem who dislikes the deregulation after LBJ

www.berniesanders.com is that way, pal. ---->

He should have won, G-ddamn it

Also Khrushchev's retard-tier schemes to improve agriculture inspired Mao to try and one up him with the Great Leap Forward.

People died. The end.

You are, it's just your history is so shit not even Danes care about it.

>liberal/socdem
Explains "FDR 9/10". Though not "Eisenhower 9/10"...?

They weren't white, national self-determination didn't apply. :^)

Maybe 8/10 for Eisenhower. He would a liberal by today's standards.

Some Bernouts inexplicably think Eisenhower was a socialist which he very much was not. He was a typical small town Midwestern Republican of his generation and he voted against FDR in three of his four elections.

...

Ebert: 4/10
Hindenburg: 2/10
Hitler: Hilter/10
Adenauer: 9/10
Ebert: 7/10
Kiesinger: 4/10
Brandt 3/10
Schmidt 8/10
Kohl: 6/10
Schröder: 5/10
Merkel: 4/10

Attached: helmut mein helmut.jpg (822x462, 84K)

Ehh mean Erhardt ofc

>>>/tumblr/

Huh. That's strange.

can any americans explain what Obama did/didn't do without being disingenuous? I don't know all the subtleties, I only experienced the "change" campaign when he ran for president here

He said something about opposing the military industrial complex which they somehow think is a left wing concept when really Ike was just viewing it through the lens of his small government Republican thinking.

Wilson: 4/10, maybe 5 if the LoN succeeded
Harding: 5/10
Coolidge: 5/10
Hoover: was fugged/10
FDR: 4/10
Truman: 6/10
Eisenhower: 8/10, pretty based
Kennedy: 5/10
LBJ: faggot/10
Nixon: 5/10, still a crook
Ford: 3/10
Carter: 4/10
Reagan: -1/10 unless you're a boomer or hate guns
GHW: 4/10
Billy Clinton: 3/10
Dubya: 3/10
Obama: 4-5/10
Trump: he's not even finished yet
Fuck you too.

>Reagan: -1/10 unless you're a boomer or
I';m sorry you hate your father, user.

Princess Vittoria circa 2025: 10/10

Attached: 26871126_206521603421323_4325280118613213184_n.jpg (868x1026, 112K)

Gorby gave you freedom, too bad you were such uncivilized cave dwellers you couldn't handle it and instead pleaded for a new strongman to come and make all decisions for you. :^)

>freedom for oligarchs to rob people blind
Having Yeltsin at the helm sure as fuck didn't help though.

Wilson 6/10
Harding N/A (really didn't do anything then got shot)
Coolidge 4/10
Hoover 2/10
FDR 9.5/10
Truman 7/10
Eisenhower 7/10
Kennedy 7/10
LBJ 8/10
Nixon 4/10
Ford 3/10
Carter 6/10
Reagan 3/10
Bush Senior 5/10
Clinton 7/10
Bush Jr. 0/10
Obama 5/10
Trump -2/10

Nobody gives a fuck what Libertarians think nerd

Attached: 1526509098854.jpg (640x711, 61K)

Harding ended Wilson's police state.

He was openly racist as fuck, but he also did a lot to break apart the then-monopolies that controlled a good chunk of the country; which ironically paved the way for those at the bottom's lives (i.e. minorities) to improve enormously once the economy restabilized under FDR.

You give Coolidge, Hoover, and Ford too little credit.

Coolidge passed the Indian Citizenship Act, granting citizenship to Native Americans. I'd argue that's a big deal for him.

Hoover, contrary to popular belief, actually did attempt to reverse the Great Depression. He passed Glass-Steagall, for instance. It's just that he started to try to fix things too late (he initially assumed the depression would resolve itself).

Ford started the special education program for special needs children.

>economy
>restabilized under FDR

Attached: 1300044776986.jpg (250x250, 23K)

He also gave women the right to vote.

Ford was just eh more than anything. His time in office was the result of a republican cabal and that's all it would ever be, no matter how hard he tried to fight it.

My rating on Hoover and Coolidge is unchanged, though I do agree the ICA was commendable, so I guess maybe a +0.5 for that.

Much like the Great Rescission, it started before Roosevelt took office. Granted, his first two terms didn't do much to help, but by the end of it all he virtually shaped every aspect of our economy (and country) into what we see today.

Wilson 5/10
Harding 4/10
Coolidge 5/10
Hoover 1/10
FDR 9/10
Truman 8/10
Eisenhower 7/10
Kennedy 9/10
LBJ 5/10
Nixon 4/10
Ford 2/10
Carter 7/10
Reagan 8/10
GHW Bush 6/10
Clinton 4/10
GW Bush 7/10
Obama 5/10

Ford tried in vain to prevent the leftist Democrat Congress from ending all aid to South Vietnam, but they had a veto-proof majority.

*Recession

>leftist
>democrat
Center-left is not leftist. There were no actual socialists in either party of Congress.

^this

Wilson: 1/10 (got us into WW1)
Harding: 2/10
Coolidge 8/10 (immigration act)
Hoover: 2/10
FDR: 0/10 (got us into the bloodiest war ever and illegally intervened in Europe)
Truman: 2/10
Eisenhower: 1/10
Kennedy: 2/10
LBJ: 1/10
Nixon: 1/10
Everyone after this is fully a jewish puppet
Ford: 0/10
Carter: 0/10
Reagan: 0/10
Bush: 0
Clinton: 0
Bush: 0
Obama: 0
Trump: 0

Not exactly true. The Constitution never forbade women from voting; prior to the 19th Amendment the legality of it was left to the state and local level. About 30 states in 1919 already allowed women to vote, the amendment just mandated it nationwide.

made this a year ago

Attached: 1516745811471.png (1316x2822, 2.39M)

...

Kerensky 5/10 (A well-meaning idiot)
Lenin 2/10 (Commie)
St*lin 0/10 (Psychotic butcher)
Khruschev 6/10 (First leader who actually improved quality of life of the people)
Brezhnev 2/10 (Senile neo-stalinist puppet)
Gorbachev 3/10 (His accomplishments were significant but he's still incompetent)
Yeltsin 7/10 (Inadvertently, he managed to usher an era of freedom and independent though which was only darkened by the banditry of ex-soviet convict gangs and corrupt elites. Would've been 10/10 if he'd managed to dismantle Russia and rid us of the eternal curse of Imperialism)
Putin 1/10 (A textbook example of trading away freedom for security.)
Medvedev 2/10 (Putin's puppet, but a bit more liberal)

Attached: 1528591050561.jpg (613x531, 36K)

>Hoover, contrary to popular belief, actually did attempt to reverse the Great Depression

>imposing taxes and tariff walls in the middle of a depression
Genius.

>carter
>jewish puppet
Lel

Wilson 6/10
Harding 1/10
Coolidge 5/10
Hoover 7/10
FDR 10/10
Truman 8/10
Eisenhower 7/10
Kennedy 6/10
LBJ 8.5/10
Nixon 2/10
Ford 6/10
Carter 4/10
Reagan 2/10
Bush 5/10
Clinton 5/10
Bush 0/10
Obama 5/10
Trump 2/10

>Taft that loww
Looks like someone's trust needs busting. Nixon should be in average, though, for the shit he pulled with the War on Drugs.

>FDR 10/10
>LBJ 8.5/10

my man

Alfonsin 7/10 (1983)
Menem 0/10
Menem 0/10
De la rua 2/10
Duhalde 5/10
Kirchner 9/10
Fernandez 6/10
Fernandez 3/10
Macri 3?/10 (actual president)

The NSA police state and the MIC that liberals whine about was actually the creation of a leftist Democrat president FDR who transformed the US economy into one huge war machine so completely that it's never been possible to change it back again.

>LBJ 8.5/10

I love gibesmedat and 50,000 body bags.

lmfao what a bunch of retards
Eisenhower overthrew democratically elected socialist leaders all across the globe

>Eisenhower overthrew democratically elected socialist leaders all across the globe

Attached: trash.jpg (778x1018, 394K)

All our leaders since XVIII century were only Russians, Germans and Jews or their agents. The second half of 80s and 90s was also first period when Americans entered the game, but they can be classified as Jews too, i guess.

It is really hard to tell who was/is the best. I would say that Jews are, because they weren't killing as many of us as Russians and Germans did.

Imagine being this assmad about welfare. You do realize the average welfare recipient is a single twenty-something white mother with three kids working as a cashier at Wal-Mart, right? Not a fucking "welfare queen."

Even worse, Nixon expanded gibesmedat.

>Nixon expanded gibsmedat
>when he literally cracked down on drugs for the sole purpose of prosecuting black people and hippies because he didn't like them
This is bait, right? I sincerely hope you're only pretending to be retarded.

It's true though. He did extend the Great Society and even proposed national health insurance on top of creating a load of regulations that choked the US economy for a decade.

nigger, we give hundreds of millions to corporations in subsidies but you're mad about gibesmedat

newsweek.com/donald-trump-welfare-black-white-780252
40% of welfare recipients are white. 25.7% are black.
So much for gibsmedat.

>nigger, we give hundreds of millions to corporations in subsidies

I never defended that. That's also a form of socialism and not free market economics at all.

nytimes.com/1972/10/31/archives/nixon-signs-5billion-bill-expanding-social-security-president-signs.html
Nixon also pushed for individual mandate healthcare, which is what Obamacare is.

>socialism is when the government does stuff
Holy shit, you're unironically retarded. Government interference is not socialism. Socialism is where the workers own the means of production. You are a retard

>implying universal healthcare is a bad thing

Robert Borden - 6/10
Arthur Meighen - 4/10
William Lyon Mackenzie King - 8/10
R.B. Bennett - 5/10
Louis St. Laurent - 7/10
John Diefenbaker - 9/10
Lester B. Pearson - 8/10
Pierre Trudeau - 7.5/10
Joe Clark - 9/10
John Turner - 7/10
Brian Mulroney - 5/10
Kim Campbell - Only was PM when Parliament wasn't in session/10
Jean Chretien - 9.5/10
Paul Martin - 7/10
Stephen Harper - 6/10
Justin Trudeau - (currently) 7.5/10

What did Clark do? Don't know much about him

I'm pretty sure that socialism is when the state owns all production and you go to a labor camp if you happen to object.

basically nothing as PM, but he was pretty good (in my opinion) policy wise, and was one of the last actually good tory leaders

No, that's communism.

>it's another thread where a brainlet thinks socialism=North Korea

Attached: facepalm.png (1500x912, 184K)

t. Hayek

I was making a stupid joke you dense motherfuckers

Ah, ok. I hope that Canadian politics can departisanize soon so that same people can run, but considering the power of media and sound bytes, we're probably fucked for good

Wilson: I hope he's burning in hell/10
Harding: 5/10
Coolidge: 9/10
Hoover:: 5/10
FDR: -5/10
Truman: -3/10
Eisenhower: 8/10
JFK: 8/10
LBJ: -3/10
Dick: 4/10
Ford: 3/10
Carter: 2/10
Reagan: 7.5/10
Old Bush: 2/10
Slick Willy: 3/10
Young Bush: -911/10
Obama: -5/10
Trump: so far 7/10

>Young Bush: -911/10
He was ok if he didn't try to appoint his personal attorney to the Supreme Court.

Attached: 1529365366971.png (1316x2822, 2.4M)

cringe

This but unironically

Kennedy legalized public sector unions. Fuck. That. Shit.

>unions bad
Retarded

When even the socialist FDR objected to public sector unions, it tells you something.

>Hoover 7/10
>LBJ 8/10; Kennedy 7/10

U retarded m8?

Attached: Screenshot_20180615-141320.png (1419x1450, 1.93M)