>annex a bunch of land from Mexico
>complain that there's so many spics living in your country
why do Anglos do this?
>annex a bunch of land from Mexico
>complain that there's so many spics living in your country
why do Anglos do this?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
lmao we just classified them as white when we annexed the territory
It was all apart of the treaty, because we promised to treat Mexicans as full citizens (plot-twist, we didn't)
There sure weren't any spics there in 1848, maybe about 20,000 people total of European descent. The rest was just a desert full of Indians and wild animals.
Nobody lived there at the time, it hadn't been settled yet. There was a tiny handful of farmers and ranchers and mostly just injuns. The Mexicans who did live there were given citizenship and assimilated long ago. All the ones there now are immigrated relatively recently.
The overwhelming majority of Hispanics currently living in the US were immigrants that came after the 1965 immigration reform
This.
Liberals even flat-out said the 1965 Immigration Act wouldn't "alter the demographics of the U.S." What a lie.
en.wikipedia.org
That land was basically uninhabited.
>Be from south or central Mexico, thousands of km from California
>Claim that California belongs to "your people"
Lol, what? The Aztec Empire never made it anywhere near that far north.
>get rid of antiquated, racist 19th century immigration laws that favored white people with blonde hair and blue eyes
>bad
Fuck off, Jow Forums.
>every mexican is descended from Aztec
Are you retarded per chance?
Aztecs weren't even close to the only Indian civilization in modern Mexico.
jokes on the you, those laws were from the 1920's not the 19th century
And I'd take European immigrants over poor 3rd world shitholers any day of the week
t. José
Would rather have immigrants from rich First World places such as Europe, Canada, South Korea, Japan, Australia, etc. than Third Worlders. Anyone with common sense would. It's just the Democratic Party sees votes, so they're willing to sell out the country.
And yet, they are the ones who want claim California for themselves... what business does a Chiapan have in California? Be specific.
Jokes on you, you fucking idiot
"20th century" immigration reform began in the early 1882 with the Chinese Exclusion Act.
The quota system wasn't the only fucking law.
Wow, shocking, considering that most of Europe was limited by the quota system, and Japan, S. Korea, would've been nearly 100% blocked.
you are anglo yourself
and most mexicans today there are from the 1980's onward
CHIs are caliming that, not us, only an idiot would claim clay from a superpower.
You are suffering Texas 2.0 strategy
Don't get so mad José, you won't get deported for now
Half the buggers are Spanish rape babies. Should they cut themselves in half and ship one half back to Madrid?
we're all native american
Why can't you make a country people don't desperately wish to flee? You'd think by the 1980s you'd have been able to figure that out. It feels like Africa will gets its shit together before Central America.
>CHIs are caliming that
Only leftist students in California take Aztlan shit seriously.
>You are suffering Texas 2.0 strategy
Huh?
Yes
Lol the more native you are in Mexico the more you're looked down upon.
prepare for a new wave after we become venezuela 2.0
:3
so?
>everyone who doesn't want 20th century immigration is a mexican
Honestly your pitiful, you should at least provide some substance before trying to insult a person.
>>You are suffering Texas 2.0 strategy
>Huh?
For fucks sake, learn some history you fucking retard.
The reason the Texan Revolt began is that Mexican government wanted to allow Americans to settle Texas, but 20 years later they chimped out. 3
But only an absolutely brainlet leftist believes in there being a single Native American people when it was thousands of tribes spanning two continents.
You don't the irony in claiming land rights because of native ancestry while simultaneously having a society that ostracizes you the more native you are?
Yeah, get lots of foreigners in your land, allow them to stay, they are more than your native people at some point, they chimpout because local laws, they claim the land as theirs, they declare independence, territory is lost.
>The reason the Texan Revolt began is that Mexican government wanted to allow Americans to settle Texas, but 20 years later they chimped out
What does that have to do with anything?
why are you so butthurt about us invading the us? shouldn't you be dealing with the moroccans and assorted blacks and muslims in your own fricking cunt?
What was wrong with the immigration system before 1965 though?
Also why are you so mad?
We'll send the beaners home eventually like we did when we took half their country.
native americans are different ethnic groups but it's one (1) race like white people
no
My forebearers came here because Mexico is a failed state. Why in the actual fuck would we want to secede and _rejoin_ that shithole?
whites babies aren't even the majority anymore
you're over
we command you to do it
Based and redpilled
keep talking like that and I think tomorrow belongs to me.
You moron. There's 200 million whites in the US and growing.
All it would take are a few button presses to turn Mexico into a glowing radioactive crater. :^)
keep dreaming
kys terrone
>
It kept people out that could be useful to the country solely because they were not a western European.
Indians, for example, so many of them have made major advances, or helped in major ways in the fields of medicine and technology, but they would've have been let in if it was not for the 1965 reform.
Note: I tried to completely stay away from the vast amounts of social issues that was wrong with the pre-1965 laws
Because there weren't that many Mexicans living there and those that were wanted to be part of America since Mexico's army was beyond worthless against the bandits.
btw most illegals are from gutemala, honduras, el salvador and nicargua and illegally immigrate to mexico first
Leftists don't like Indians or Asians anyway because they tend to actually get a job and an education. They only prefer ethnicities that can be useful to the Democrat Party in some way.
>Indians, for example, so many of them have made major advances, or helped in major ways in the fields of medicine and technology
Don't you think those people could've been more useful in india? Why is the USA entitled to all of these innovations?
>fails to refute argument
>reverts to strawmen from Jow Forumsthedonald
>literal doctors immigrating make him angry because they aren’t le huwhite
why is race so important to you?
Yes, the US's raw population of white people is fine, it's just declining as a percentage as the country gets so many Latinos and Asians.
I mean, no one talks about Asians. They were not even 1% of the population not long ago, and they're projected to be nearly 10% of the US population in 2040.
Pajeet hands typed this post