Researchers are now saying the moons orbiting large gas planets maybe even better for life than Earth is.
Researchers have found 100 large moons orbiting even larger planets by using a telescope.
There is now 175 moons in our own solar system.
This means there is likely millions of moons to be found out there.
Other urls found in this thread:
iopscience.iop.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
Based moons
BASED LIFE
source in scientific jargon:
>Researchers have found 100 large moons orbiting even larger planets by using a telescope.
What? I don't think there's even any confirmed exomoons yet
en.wikipedia.org
what is worse, confirming we are the only life in the universe or confirming other intelligent life exists?
OR IS THERE LIFE ON MOOOOOOOOOOOONS?
>to know that we are truly alone
>or that others exist but no matter our efforts we'd never reach them
>Researchers are now saying the moons orbiting large gas planets maybe even better for life than Earth is.
Really sick of brainlets writing articles for clickviews.
Guess, I have to spoonfeed the retards here on Jow Forums; if they were indeed 'better for life than Earth is', they would actually have developed life before the Earth instead of be barren of life altogether.
Fuck me, when did Astronomy turn into Astrology?
the source doesn't say moons are better for life than earth, its saying statistically there are possibly more large terrestrial moons in the habitable zones of stars than there are earth sized terrestrial planets
you in the pic
Both are equally terrifying
*moons at you*
I'd rather be alone than worry about other intelligent life deciding I'm in need of colonization.
*notices you in the corner and moons at you too*
do we really need one more globe to suffer on its surface? the earth is already redundant
>what is worse
Seeing an incredibly dumb australian post everyday.
>confirming other intelligent life exists?
This. Google "The Great Filter theory"
>We compare this with previously estimated occurrence rates of terrestrial planets in the HZ of G, K, and M stars and find that if each giant planet has one large terrestrial moon then these moons are less likely to exist in the HZ than terrestrial planets. However, if each giant planet holds more than one moon, then the occurrence rates of moons in the HZ would be comparable to that of terrestrial planets, and could potentially exceed them.
It has to do with comparing to previous models of hz moon generation
sorry but nothing profound
Do you lack reading comprehension? I'm criticising clickbait popsci article not the scientific article. Why are you drawing conclusions from the scientific article when you only read the abstract? You shouldn't be calling anyone else a brainlet.
clickbait popular science "news" are the worst
they likely dont even understand the scientific article they are making news of
It's been like that since I can remember, funnily enough. Popsci faggots never learn.
Except for radiation. Moons have no magnetic fields and gas giants emit a lot of radiation.
>tfw you will never get to see alien animu
Theory - we didn't find life (or one should say - it didn't find us) because we are the Old Ones
Other life?
YEAH KILL EM
Stop taking selfies and go away, 18 year old boomer.
it's a popular sci fi idea, that we are the first
I don't wanna live on no moon
I'd like other life in universe, but unreachable to each other due to time/space
That's not a moon
Moonman moonman can't you see
Spics and niggers need to hang from trees
Is it possible for a black person to do mooning? Or should that be "dark side of the mooning"
could be, or a black hole I guess?
That's racist. For now on, you may refer black holes as african american holes.
i LOVE gas giants
Would the correct term for black person mooning be "african american holing" then? Sounds pretty good actually.
yep the green and blue planet with 7 billion humans on it which has had life since forever is less hospitable than a frozen barren lifeless world with no/poison atmosphere