>niggers are really stupid (70)
>spics are slightly below average (90)
>wh*teoids are average iq (100)
>chinks and jews are slightly above average (105)
>no race is really smart (130)
why are humans so dumb?
Niggers are really stupid (70)
boy do i have the board for you
Ashkenazi Jews have the highest average IQ of any ethnic group for which there are reliable data. They score 0.75 to 1.0 standard deviations above the general European average, corresponding to an IQ 112-115. This has been seen in many studies.
The difference between Ashkenazis and the other Europeans are cultural though,
because for historical reasons, they are on average of higher social classes.
If you compare them to the results for europeans upper class, they perform equally well
On the other hand, east asians seem to biologically outperform whites
You're aware that the IQ scale is an arbitrary score based on the average for whites, right?
Can we please not use these metrics to judge people
>are cultural
ashkenazis are genetically close to southern italians, they have little to do with anglos or scandies
>arbitrary
>based on the average for whites
that's not how it works, yves
I'm talking about IQ scores, not the colour of their skin or the curlyness of their body hair
Placing "100" as the average is an arbitrary decision, it does not have a meaning per se.
So complaining that
>no race is really smart (130)
has no sense
>If you compare them to the results for europeans upper class, they perform equally well
I wonder how you come to this conclusion and not take it to it's logical endpoint: IQ differences are based on class and wealth, not race.
>IQ differences are based on class and wealth, not race.
So surely Asians should score lower than Europeans?
average IQ in Poland is 140
>IQ differences are based on class and wealth, not race.
Actually it's both but probably more on education, it's true.
A racial Ashkenazi raised as a poor Somalian will score on average way less than a racial Somalian raised as a rich european Jew.
>they are on average of higher social classes
Why do you think that is?
Scroll down to "Ashkenazi Economic and Social History"
web.mit.edu
He meant culture and education
It is true that East Asians have a culture based on working hard
but the score itself isn't arbitrary since it's a metric-based calculation. it isn't based on the averages for whiteoids either. the average whiteoid just happens to only have 'average' intelligence. the other groups are measured irrespective of the whiteoid average
>Why do you think that is?
European tier education + spirit of tribal collaboration
(+ the fact that late Middle Ages laws often forbid them to own land that pushed european aristocrats to use them as bankers, as they were not seen as dangers for at the time, power was based on land, which is not the case anymore since industrial revolution)
Fuck me you're dumb
They have a higher IQ even when accounting for socioeconomic status.
journals.sagepub.com
nope
wh*Toids are the niggers of Israel
Aren't Ashkenazim the most 'white', though?
holy mother of COPE
As I said for East Asians, it's not only a matter of social status but also of culture and education
Nope, it's time for you to face the fact that there are genetic differences in IQ
Yes there are, never said otherwise
Do not fetishize too much this kind of scales