>Guy who adopted bitcoin back when it was in the single digits and made a fortune is an idiot.
Imagine believing this.
Is this man a genius?
Nicholas Cook
David Moore
he likes to think he's well connected, but apart from a number of investments he made early, he's all but alienated himself now from being able to associate with projects that arent bcash related, thanks to all of the temper tantrums he's had and drama he's caused.
he's a non-pedo version of brock pierce, and if bcash wants a real future free of drama, ver is going to need to distance himself from it, and that doesn't even get into worse actors like wright.
Brandon Gonzalez
Sure. Whatever you need to tell yourself to stay convinced that your outdated chain is still a valid option for either payment OR value storage.
>them fees tho
>those txns/s tho
Brody Thomas
>single example
until there is one there shouldn't be any lawsuits, but if there was one, the case would be clear, that's my point.
Justin Miller
"Yes, Judge, I didn't understand the most important thing about the high volatility asset I was planning on purchasing, nor did I realize I made an error when I transferred to my wallet... and, as we all know, it is impossible to exchange BCH to BTC easily, so..."
Truly an embarrassing gambit.
Justin Smith
shitskin detected
Nathaniel Cox
>misleads hundreds of thousands of people
David Davis
in reality: someone bought a coin being listed as bitcoin, and ended up with bcash. you can't spin that
Grayson Torres
If two implementations that used to be POSIX where to change where one of the implementations changed into something not posix(bitcoin) but it still called itself posix would it merit it's name? No. It would only have the brand but ofc the community would choose the fork if posix compatibility was important to them and eventually they would also get the name(assuming the implementation took the name of the specification and the fork took the name posix cash).
So we're left with a brand issue and bitcoin is not a copyrighted name. Meaning there is no legal precedent sat for bitcoin cash to not call itself bitcoin (BCH) or whatever it wants. Case closed.