>still <$200M market cap

They lied about the wikimedia partnership too

it's only with wikimedia france. Fucking kek. Enjoy your shitcoin bags

Don't forget that they LITERALLY burn tokens right out of your wallet, who the fuck would buy this?

They didn't lie, you're just an illiterate pajeet.

this guy gets it

Oh okay, so it is in fact not a PwC partnership, by a partnership with an office or two of a couple hundred office firm.

Don't oversell things.

Yeah I think the French division of it isn't even really considered PwC. My uncle works in the actual US company, and he often hears people muttering something about escargo and laughing down the hallways.

If you look it up on google maps, PwC france is just a sign on what looks like an apartment building, I think they're actually trying to distance themselves from them.

kek, REQ needs to lie this much to try and get people to buy their bags.

It's not "an office or two". It's a whole French division, including francophone Africa. Neck yourself.

Honestly asking since I haven't looked much into REQ, why does a crypto pay button need it's own token? Atomic swap thing? Any benefit to REQ holders?

I don't know about you guys but REQ sentiment is turning around and feeling about the same as the bullrun that led to the .3 to 1.20 moon
chart is looking bullish and there's too much good news piling up to ignore

I see a "who's next" FOMO that's starting to build with possible partnership announcements and that alone will cause regular pumps

>why does it need its own token
It boils down to being able to offer fees lower than any current payment method on the market by an order of magnitude. This is what the token business model enables.

it doesn't

most ecommerce sites already have a coinpayments button that works just as well. REQ supposedly has a slightly better UI. But otherwise it's redundant

There's no benefit, this is a complete shit token stay away.

Request is not a pay button. It's a whole platform. REQ exists to ensure blockchain agnosticism and to incetivize continued development of platform and applications built on it.

>work just as well
They are centralised, have higher fees and do not allow seamless integration with current accounting/auditing/bookkeeping systems. Don't talk about things you know nothing about.

>work in Audit
>literally an absolute wageslave grunt who works massive hours for low pay
>job consists of sending questionnaires to companies and ticking boxes even though actual accounts look like total shit, all the while making money for the partner
>thinks he gets access to global strategic decision making in the company's tech adoption roadmap

Keep grunting away, swamplife.

Ignore these retards and literally put your money into anything else. If you want the REQ experience just take out $1000 and light it on fire, it'll be much more entertaining.

Funny thing is that Request (or other crypto) will make his job obsolete.
>5 posts by this ID dedicated to FUD
Why so much effort though?

Because he thinks his shitposts on a niche japanese anime imageboard are going to keep the price low and make lots of tokens burn so he becomes a rich boy for his mommy

this is a chink hype scam game, didnt you get the memo?

PwC USA > everyone else's revenue. PwC Western Europe is comparatively small to PwC USA... so PwC France & its nigger offices isn't shit my dude.

Again, T. PwC employee

Audit - definitely obsolete if triple entry accounting becomes adopted mainstream, which is obviously will.

He is probably freshmeat from university who was suckered into the Big 4 because of the brand name though. They usually last until they get their training done and then quit.

Because if you can't beat them, join them.

I have over 140k REQ and I sincerely hope that anyone that actually felt swayed by my absolute low effort shitposts loses their money because they don't have the capacity to think for themselves.

That’s because you don’t work in PwC’s blockchain lab nor do you work for PwC France. On top of that, there were no leaks of their working together until it was officially announced.

vitalik.ca/general/2017/10/17/moe.html
>If developers want to front-load revenue to fund initial development, then they can sell a token, with the property that all fees paid are used to buy back some of the token and burn it; this would make the token backed by the future expected value of upcoming fees spent inside the system. One can transform this design into a more direct utility token by requiring users to use the utility token to pay fees, and having the interface use an exchange to automatically purchase tokens if the user does not have tokens already.

Also with plasma the entire token economics can change if they wanted

ya the FUD is mostly bored LARPers trying to troll.
No one is this invested in any project to constantly FUD it unless they're mentally ill or paid shills. It'd be better for them to just move on and look for other projects to invest in.

No one cares, you monkey. How do you feel about blockchain replacing you within 2 years? About time you start writing your McDonald's motivation letter.

Fun fact: a CPA's job will never be obsolete because a CPA must sign off on a public audit.

Fun fact: it took a decade of discussion to change the new revenue recognition standards and we still won't see full implementation for another fiscal year.

So if you think some random shitcoin is going to "remove public accounting", you honestly have 0 understand of what public accounting is.

Can you give me the time frame it took GAAP to adopt the new lease standards and rev rec? Also can you tell me how frequently IFRS & GAAP give converging opinions?

>CPA must sign off on a public audit
Not with blockchain. It'll be 2 Big Macs and medium french fries, sir.

Nice to see Vitalik validating this business model.

PwC USA couldn’t even get the Best Picture Oscars right. Your division looked stupid in front of the world.

Great, can you tell me how I can sue the blockchain once someone uses it to commit fraud? dont say it's not possible. Everything has a backdoor. Everything has a switch to hit.

I don't work in the US, but seriously - a bunch of faggots taking years to decide which part of the balance sheet something needs to be declared doesn't change the fact that our industry is going to get absolutely unironically fucking REQ'd from crypto within the next few years.

Serve your time at PshitC and bail to a startup. Most firms in accounting will have to be a business advisory / technology specialist hybrid - NOT a bloated piece of shit filled with graduate wageslaves.

it doesnt, the token is entirely superfluous
there's nothing stopping companies from just sending and receiving ether

Kys you fucking LARPer. You're pathetic.

No, just no. I have been in big 4 audit for 3 years and there are highly technical decisions which need professional judgement to resolve. Computers and blockchains are decades away from automating that part. Things like verifying cash, revenue, and expenses could be automated though but would need highly sophisticated and well tested systems which should still be years away.

You would sue the REQ team I guess, what's so hard about that?

Also you talk like a fucking boomer how old are you? Do you think you can also just copy and paste your bitcoins to double your money as well?

You know the B4 are a services firm and not a narrow accounting firm? You know that they are already advisory and technology specialist firms right? Holy fuck you actually don't know anything.

By the way, only 50% of Fortune 500 companies use Data Analytics. I'm sure 100% will fully adopt REQ in a few years and GAAP will for the first time in history issue a new standard in a "few years" and have it fully implemented?

I genuinely can't believe someone could be so naive.

So you can now sue a team for someone else misusing their tech? Brb let me sue Ford when someone rearends me. Thanks!

You're literally retarded. No wonder you wagecuck as a trained monkey.

I'll entertain your brainletism. If all data can be inputted automatically, there is literally no way to commit a fraud. If there is a need for some data to be inputted manually, you sue the one who inputted wrong data.

Attached: 1511950906666.jpg (1218x1015, 212K)

it's funny you guys are jerking off vitalik when he literally just released news of Plasma Cash, which will render REQ completely useless

>You would sue the REQ team I guess, what's so hard about that?
No, you wouldn't. It's a decentralized platform.

Solid Chain, Solid Team, Great Price. Ask yourself if this chain will be a lot bigger this time next year. If you think it will be... well invest... everything else is just bullshit.

But you just implied that you needed someone to sue for comitting fraud.

Well this would all be automated right? Machines and computers do make mistakes just like humans.

Why do you so vehemently support a coin that declines in value despite "strong" "partnership" "announcements"?

Holy fuck you're retarded. This is an exact line that someone would say that doesn't know shit about technology and still gets their ideas about it from 80s movies.

Machines and computers only do exactly what they've been built to and programmed to do. If any mistake gets made, it's from an error in the code.

Computers aren't sentient retard, and if a competent team made sure the math was correct and it was audited properly, there will be no mistakes.

How did you get a job at PwC?

datawallet not

>Machines and computers do make mistakes just like humans.
So do you normally sue computer if something breaks? Or are you implying that blockchain or smart contracts can be tampered with? Or that they make mistakes? You're an utter moron.
>Why do you so vehemently support a coin that declines in value despite "strong" "partnership" "announcements"?
Because price action has nothing to do with platform mechanics which we are discussing. How dense are you?

How many times did Russian missle Radars and American missle radars make mistakes during the Cold War? How many times did a human have to make the judgement call of not beginning a nuclear armageddon? Computers do make mistakes. It is our job as humans, auditors, to interpret the results and make professional judgement based decisions.

your portfolio is a joke homie

It does not fucking matter you absolute brainlet.
The bot is just buying pressure and will rise the price accordingly when usage goes up, but the % of req burnt will be inconsequential for price for tens of years.
It does not matter if the bot burns 1 req or ten, it's the amount of $ of buying pressure that makes the price go up.
I bet there is some brainded whale out there keeeping the price low because he believes the same shit as you.
All pwc revenues around 36 billion dollars, all americas pwc revenue 16 billions, usa pwc around 12 billions, all europe pwc revenues 14 billions, france pwc revenues around 4 billions.
While the US branch is indeed the larger one, scoffing over a partnership with a 4 billion dollars revenue firm is even below Jow Forums low standards.
And like the wikimedia one, is a matter of brand prestige, req has gained way more than what these already incredible partnerships bring on the table, the network effect will be an avalanche.

Ah yes, and I’m sure the CFO cc’s you on all investment decisions as well?

If a machine, a computer or any kind of technological device makes a mistake, then it was a mistake from the maker, you absolute brainlet. Jesus fucking Christ here's your (You)

Attached: IMG_3057.jpg (225x224, 18K)

It was the sensors that provided them with unclear information, which the incredibly complex algorithms evaluated as an incoming nuclear strike. And that was decades ago. How can you even compare the complexity of an early warning system to fucking auditing?

And if the sun reflects in such a strange way that the satellite and computer info interprets incorrectly? Which happened, by the way.
We are talking about blockchain, try to keep up little guy.

Everyone, look closely. This is the face of a person that will lose their job to blockchain in the coming years.

Can't understand it, won't understand it, even as they're working to their own demise.

Attached: 1521239170170.png (750x750, 679K)

No, you started talking about early warning system, you absolute brainlet. Get raped by a nigger.

(You)

By the time blockchain makes it to public accounting, I'll probably be 50-60 years old and I am not even in my late 20s yet.

>I'm not even in my late 20s yet
Wow who would have thought

(You)

You'll be flipping burgers by the time you're in your late 20s.

im apart of a large scale mining operation and am friends with one of the leading Core devs. I am sure you have atleast double what I have said, right?

I don't give a single fuck about anything you have to say, no.

That's what I thought faggot. Get fucking good.

My crypto plan: 30k personal loan split evenly between REQ, LINK, and FUN. Am I dumb?

REQ is a joke*

lol so butthurt.

>FUN

Attached: Are we having FUN yet.jpg (1280x720, 181K)

Hi sir, is possible for implement REQ token into online curry shop?
I and brother hakish make very fine currie. We be world leader, lots of tokens burn.
Thank you

Wow greatest partnership, perfect spot for REQ

No arguement.

I don't want to take such big risks. I invested a 6 digit amount into REQ and expect the burning to make the price rise with time giving me a higher return on investment than my traditional 8% YoY stock portfolio.

>The bot is just buying pressure and will rise the price accordingly when usage goes up, but the % of req burnt will be inconsequential for price for tens of years.

Years, yes. But not "tens of years". You do realize that the token burn fee is charged over ALL their monetary flows right? Not just fees for their payment portal. But also all accounting revenue,audits,invoices,NGO donations (such as wikipedia) and all future unknown partnerships and Dapps that they'll run.

As long as I and other people can keep the REQ price around $0.20 everything will be ok.

And yes, you are right. People like me are going to keep the price of REQ down long-time so if you are daytrading it's better to start selling your REQ right now as I'm sure educated people like me with actual substantial amount of REQ are going to suppress the price for the next year or two until the amount burnt has been significant enough to allow the price to rise a little.

Most of us don't just want to sell our bags to the next holder for a slightly higher price. We want to make passive income off of the burn bot.

If you are poor with only a couple thousand REQ then just market sell already since you won't be making any profit the next 2 years (Me and others will make sure of it as keeping REQ low to allow for a bigger burn gives us a bigger return on investment).

Don't call other people brainlets if you don't know who you are talking to.

Attached: G273X0X.png (1202x65, 5K)

I’m an auditor at PWC, LOL if you think some random shitcoin will take our jobs

I like how you make this retarded post every request thread.

You can't control the price of req with only 1 million coins once it takes off.

10k req here, planning on holding at least for a year. held since november. will i make it whale user?

i used to work at a big4 (KPMG).

honestly you can think of each big4 only being connected vaguely to each other. there only is a vague "shell" company that holds all local branches together, but e.g. PwC Germany has literally no-fucking-thing to do with PwC US or PwC South Africa. They are literally separate companies.

Think of Porsche and VW - technically belonging to the same company, yet they have nothing to do with each other.

Sure, just install the LooCommerce plugin
You are trying too hard
top 100 wallet here planning to hold for years, you are preaching to the choir, but you are deluded if you think that you can keep the price down as soon as a decent burn starts. Do the math lol.

yes

I'm sure going to try. And I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one.

I'm going to be honest with you. If you're going to daytrade you're better off selling your REQ right now as people like me will suppress the price for 1-2 more years until burning truly ramps up to a huge amount every day.

If you are planning to just keep holding it long term then you should keep holding and ignore the price of the REQ tokens as they are manipulated and don't represent the real value.

do you know what the burn rate will be? if this hits mass adoption, how many tokens can realistically be burned?

so the basic idea is to keep the price low, as that burns more tokens over time? interesting idea.

Don't fucking bother. Every REQ thread where they scream about the PwC partnership I try to explain that the office's are almost complete autonomous and operate with the overall firm's network infrastructure. No one seems to understand..

And you don't seem to understand that no one with a brain really gave a shit about the pwc or wikimedia partnership The only thing of value here is woocommerce. But you're a brainlet and probably didn't even notice.

req will never fall below 20 cents again. It's too late now. Accumulation phase is over.

It might hover around one dollar for a while but anything under that is too attractive with all of the attention it has now.

Yes. Most people in crypto right now are just day traders. So they will get impatient if the price stays stable (or drops) the entire time. They will eventually sell and it'll either get bought up by someone like me or it'll get burned by the burn bot.

So eventually they are just selling their REQ tokens while they are still artificially undervalued simply because they were impatient to wait.

I care about how much profit I'll make in 5 years. This method gives me a far higher return on investment rather than letting the price of REQ grow organically (would probably be around $0.80 now). When we have problems keeping the price down (due to the burning bot buying too much) which I'll guess be in a year or two then I'll stop suppressing the price and it'll immediately go from ~$0.20 to $3-5. And then it'll probably spark a massive FOMO into REQ pushing it up even higher which will be when I sell.

Do you really think the real price is $0.20 right now? Don't be naive. I had 1.5 million REQ 2 months ago, that should tell you about the struggle to suppress pumps and how much I actually had to spend to make it look like REQ was organically staying at ~$0.20 Almost slipped towards $0.30 last week. But can't let that happen.

>we don't care about the PwC partnership
>a coin that claims to change accounting forever

The absolute state of REQTowners

I already know the real price isn't .20 cents. That's what I said. You aren't going to be able to suppress it for 2 years let alone for the rest of this year.

>he unironically thinks he can suppress a top 100 coin with $250k
You'll be out of tokens within a week during a mild bull run. I think you're larping, it's more likely than you being unironically this deluded.

>Do you really think the real price is $0.20 right now? Don't be naive. I had 1.5 million REQ 2 months ago, that should tell you about the struggle to suppress pumps and how much I actually had to spend to make it look like REQ was organically staying at ~$0.20 Almost slipped towards $0.30 last week. But can't let that happen.

In your opinion,

You think it will only go to 3-5$ in 2-5 years time?

I thought people were talking about 40$ to 100$?

I had 5k REQ. I thought i could make it but are you sure. What can you tell us on small investors for long term. Is it worth it or better do it on better coins?

Crypto is NOT a joke.

its like that fat girl you knew back in highschool and you totally forgot her as your life got steadily worse.

then you hear her name 15 years later and you laugh a bit at the coincidence before you realize that its not a coincidence and she has 100x w/o you.

dont make the same mistake *they* did user.

were winnin, have faith

yeah, i dont think its only going to 3-5. in 2 years? no way. 100 eoy if theres another bullrun