Plan to split California into 3 states

What do goblinos think of this?

9news.com/article/news/nation-now/flawed-goofy-plan-to-split-california-into-3-states-needs-to-win-over-skeptics/465-cece1296-aa55-4ca4-b6cd-879b29c67480

Attached: california-still-x16x9.png (971x546, 473K)

Other urls found in this thread:

pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazonas_(Colômbia)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazonas_(Brazilian_state)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazonas_(Venezuelan_state)
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

So I can finally talk about visitng a state without trying to explain that California is more than the 2 big homeless shelters?

it will never happen
san francisco and los angeles are way too powerful toghether, and once decent public transport connects these 2 ciites, and as even more development happens they will just become one large megapolis. dont know why you idiots think everything will balkznize

It's obviously not going to happen.

It's 600km tho, quite a lot

Ok, but why?

Quite clearly a plot to have more blue representation in Congress. If they still will only get two senate seats and the same amount of house seats i'm fine with this. let them divide themselves and hopefully eventually secede.

you see how urban Socal already is.
It pretty much is an urban sprawl all the way down to San Diego, with a few gaps

This will continue and already the bay area and LA are more connected than ever. There is like no reason to seperate other than a few people wanting lower taxes and different laws than california and a few other complaints. I'm not saying its right or wrong but california seperating will not happen as much as some poltards want to believe

rural/suburban retards want to give republishits more voting power by making bumfuck desert and bumfuck forest independent states entitled to corresponding representation

>republishits more voting power
It gives more liberal voting power, the "bumfuck forest independent states" would be ruled by the bay area.

its funny, they want to keep the bay area because they know they need someone to bring in the money

So the north will be a red state and cali will remain a blue state but how about south cali.

>Be Californian
>Have to come up with inspiring new names for your states
>Choose Southern California, Northern California, and California
Christ the state of these fucking "people"

Attached: 1512020293951.jpg (1280x1117, 110K)

It's funny because there is already an actual southern california.

Imagine if everyone south of Frisco right now disappeared. This country would immediately become a trillion times better.

>Everyone from a geographic area is the same person

Jefferson supporters should be put in concentration camps and California(coast) supporters should be beaten to death

SanFran is the worst part of Cali N*rthern scum.

Norcal has white people. Socal is an ungodly mess of chinks and beaners. Time to just start over.

t. gets all his knowledge of it from Jow Forums

>SanFran
>White
lmao

what, you think all of the tech startups taking over the city are mexican?

I live in California dumb dumb

>He's proud of a bunch of soyboys sipping lattes encroaching on his city

thats not what the argument was, cuck

>at...atleast they are white

Better than fucking nothing

>Sanfranite calling anyone else a cuck
You are literally ground zero of SJW faggotry. The nesting center of 60s leftists.

I dont live there, you blithering idiot. Im just explaining how you're retarded

Cali-anons, is there any feasible way to grow the white population in that state? Or is it destined to become Mexico 2.0 except with a tiny upperclass of technocrats?

sink Los angeles into the ocean, import russian/eastern european women

More importantly, west virginia should be annexed by Virginia.

for what purpose

So, in the end is just a political move from old farts who just want more power and don't care who ended fucked ?

Than you're a retard. SanFran is literally worse in every way than even LA itself.
>Or is it destined to become Mexico 2.0 except with a tiny upperclass of technocrats?
It already is that way. Cali went through what the rest of the country is going through now. We had a big neo-nazi kind of movement in the 80s and 90s. Problem is 1960s on leftists from the rest of the country starting moving here en mass. Reagan gave amnesty to a bunch of illegals who just started voting democrat. They voted to basically open the borders and give illegals a free pass so they would pop out more democrat voters. They've grown up now. California is already doomed because the right wing people who do live here are self-hating as Californians and don't want to try. All the anti-Cali memes on here just breeds defeatism. Encourge the ones here to rise up instead of being defeatist, get the Fed government to crack down the Democrats here trying to protect illegals and expose the public at large just how far the DNC is going here to get votes. That's the best I can think of.

People already did the math and the way these are split up it would just lead to all of them being blue states. It's most likely a Dem attempt at getting more power in Congress.

meant to quote you

yes, trump voters are that retarded in case you didn't notice.

Personally both parties are retarded.
Is just like here with the pri pan prd pt and more at the end they just want more political power and fuck the people.

>Northern California
>California
>Southern California
>Baja California
>Baja California Sur
STOP THIS MADNESS

pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazonas_(Colômbia)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazonas_(Brazilian_state)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazonas_(Venezuelan_state)

literally nothing wrong with calling a territory by the same name or variants

Attached: where-is-the-amazon-rainforest-located-624x468.jpg (624x468, 58K)

Thats the point. Everyone else is tired of two big cities determining what's good for everyone else

>NorCal
>not Jefferson
>with SanFran
Why?

Housing market would collapse

It's not going to happen because the people who really want secession in California are lumped in with the Bay Area and Sacramento. Meanwhile Deseret gets their own state. Anyway it goes to demonstrate the larger split within the CA GOP between norcal and socal. Because of this split it will not pass, because socal Republicans are faggots who don't give a shit about anyone north of Fresno.

Also at least SOJ51 has a marginal chance of happening because if Democrats do it they'd win 4/5ths control over the state and thus crush any and all Republican opposition. Meanwhile the three-state initiative splits them into two states, only one of which (LA) they'd have total political control over.

It's shit like this why the CA GOP has no power, because the southern faggots are still in charge of the leadership and still constantly backstabbing northern Republicans. Which is largely why SOJ51 is a thing - it's an attempt for norcal Republicans to strike a deal with CA Dems to fuck the socal GOP leadership.

Attached: 774c13dfeccd8c9007df67d4638e12fe.jpg (433x439, 39K)

Norcal/Socal were names suggested by Southern states for California before California was admitted to the Union. The notion of a "norcal" and "socal" rests with the Mason-Dixon line and is why LA was full of CSA sympathizers during the civil war.

It is also why the CA GOP's leadership was in the north until Reagan happened, this was also when SF was only starting to deindustrialize as tech companies began building their factories south in what is now Silicon Valley rather than within city limits.

Because the CA GOP leadership (who probably had a hand in making this, if unofficially) does not give a shit about their members north of Fresno.

It's a cultural divide and one that's hard to explain without explaining the entire history of California and our political parties. But in short it happens because socal Republicans have more money. On the flip side it's also why CA Dems have to deal with San Francisco picking their leaders, because SF (for now) still has all the money that flows into the party, though LA does provide most of the votes.