I truly feel sorry for ICO buyers. It hasn’t even doubled in ETH or BTC value...

I truly feel sorry for ICO buyers. It hasn’t even doubled in ETH or BTC value. Meanwhile you could have easily made way better gains. I understand link is eventually have insane gains too but it’s just so painful seeing literal shit coins 3-4x in a month while link is just keeping its value.

Attached: E757C88A-7F78-4C9A-954A-1BBEB1853772.png (1242x2208, 162K)

It will spike soon don't you worry bby. Adoption is coming we will have parents again :~)

Damn this means I'm buying near the bottom for once 15,000 USD worth. I could give fuck all what everyone thinks. Link is either going to be huge or fail and 50/50 I'm all in with those pot odds.

But how come shitcoins without adoption or even an working product already have made so much more gains. So your argument that adoption is needed for gains doesn’t stand.

I think you are going to make it. I have $4k of link and I think I will make it too.

>It'll happen or won't happen
>50-50 odds

Oh I know, I'm mostly in shitcoins. Although I like to call them distributed startups.
I also think true adoption, which is what LINK is focused on, will make the speculative gains look tiny.
Super excited for SYS SONM LINK, those types of projects.

We are suppressing the prices for accumulation...
>he doesn't know

shouldve bought the tron ico like me cuckboys

>doesn't know how to calculate EV

If Link gets real adoption the sky is the limit. I'll be comfy staking for a few yearsI unironically think staking $100 worth of LINK will get you a decent income in a year or two.

There is no empirical way of calculating the odds that Link will be adopted like you're hoping it will. Talking about odds as though this was a casino game with agreed on rules is meaningless

If you really believe that, that's pretty shitty odds. Go play roulette instead?

Mismanaged pos. You are putting a lot of trust into a philosophy fag who is clueless about software development. Gl user
Sage all link threads

actually it almost pulled a 4x after the tokens got released, and even more so at the sibos thing pump

but you gotta be retarded to still hold that shit

bet you none of the original ico buyers are still holding that garbage

Attached: 47446DFB-1D57-4129-99DB-8D6C45984D3E.jpg (620x400, 50K)

Attached: 9A1F9444-1088-494E-8983-8587082A2CD6.jpg (2294x1276, 2.43M)

but this way his actions won't have immediate consequence so he'll be able to live with himself longer
he's afraid to khs

Meh. Bought WAN, ICX and LINK at the ICOs. Kept the two winners and dumped the loser (LINK).

I've been a software developer for over a decade. I'm sure others in link are the same. I want to use oracles but they are so difficult to set up right now.
Adoption is coming and it's from everyone already involved in the project first. That's whats so fantastic about the link holder selection process. Most of crypto is that way. BTC selected for the intelligent, future looking and technical.

Hey, deleting this message in 2 minutes, but since Ropsten is about to pop, we need to drop a FUD campaign the likes of which has never been seen on Jow Forums. We have the guys that did the directly post-ICO one. Dunno if you're part of a team, but the next few days are going to be great. Get down with us

> Hey, deleting this message in 2 minutes, but since Ropsten is about to pop, we need to drop a FUD campaign the likes of which has never been seen on Jow Forums. We have the guys that did the directly post-ICO one. Dunno if you're part of a team, but the next few days are going to be great. Get down with us

Do something useful with your time. Plenty of places to positively contribute.

I'm bullish on altcoins myself and even hold link but you are incredibly mistaken to think that speculating in the market is analogous to a poker game where you can calculate a move's expected value. You can't know the likelihood Link will blow up and you also can't know the expected returns if it does. Without that info you can't calculate EV.

Careful linkies you are being manipulated

You still here dude? want to ask some technical questions. Also a link holder

NoLinkers are a joke. Their understanding of finance is at best warped, but likely closer to 'perverted.' They have demonstrated throughout these past months a limited grasp of what Chainlink is or what it seeks to do, and multiple assertions in their fud threads have been disproven with the most basic, cursory, surface-level research. But the specifics don't annoy me so much as Nolinker’s basic mindset.

Nolinkers have an arbitrary set of critera with which they seem to be evaluating projects, but it does not involve fundamental analysis or technical analysis.Nolinkers are evaluating based on "community support" by looking at twitter followers, and have a standard of professionalism based on... the website? How frequently the CEO makes 'announcements'?

While Nolinkers intelligence is worthless in that it is deeply misguided and not even particularly useful for what it seems to want to do (measure community involvement and the professionalism of the team), I wonder if they could become part of an indicator. I'll look at some of their shills and mull it over.