LINK

NoLinkers are a joke. Their understanding of finance is at best warped, but likely closer to 'perverted.' They have demonstrated throughout these past months a limited grasp of what Chainlink is or what it seeks to do, and multiple assertions in their fud threads have been disproven with the most basic, cursory, surface-level research. But the specifics don't annoy me so much as Nolinker’s basic mindset.

Nolinkers have an arbitrary set of critera with which they seem to be evaluating projects, but it does not involve fundamental analysis or technical analysis. Nolinkers are evaluating based on "community support" by looking at twitter followers, and have a standard of professionalism based on... the website? How frequently the CEO makes 'announcements'?

While Nolinkers intelligence is worthless in that it is deeply misguided and not even particularly useful for what it seems to want to do (measure community involvement and the professionalism of the team), I wonder if they could become part of an indicator. I'll look at some of their shills and mull it over....

Thank you user! Great find! Dropping this too bankingtech.com/2018/04/first-pilot-client-transactions-executed-on-batavia-trade-finance-platform/ and bumbing this thread, solid new info on possible CL ground

LITTERALLY everything said about LINK on Jow Forums is a lie
No one has developed LINK for months
It has no partnership

Sergey does not even work on chainlink anymore, he moved for work on Smart Contracts

The volume spikes are whales meeting quotas so LINK not get delisted

There is no such thing as "Oracle problem"

Poopy

The only interest thing about LINK is how whales tricked you into believe in LINK
Reminder that you whale food

Attached: illust_67146767_20180428_171222.jpg (1260x840, 456K)

Can the hive mind start processing these things? Both of these things are huge

finextra.com/newsarticle/32019/bbva-uses-ether-and-hyperledger-to-perform-corporate-loan-deal

>BBVA has closed a EUR75 million corporate loan deal with technology partner Indra, performing the complete process from negotiation to the signing of the loan over a mix of different public and private blockchain-based platforms.

>The Spanish bank says the pilot transaction reduced the time taken to complete the deal from days to hours by recording and tracking interactions, reviews and iterations over an inhouse-developed digital ledger using the Hyperledger platform.

>Once the contract was agreed, Ethereum’s public blockchain (testnet) was used to register the hash or unique identifier related to the transaction’s documentation, in this way guaranteeing the 'immutability' of the agreed contract.

this board is already infested with normies, we just lurk.

>found chainlink on youtube, then the subreddit, then finally transitioned to /biz.

LINK is going to be really valuable when the people holding on Binance can't get their tokens out due to the coming exit scam

For anyone who doesn't already have it bookmarked, cryptopanic.com is a fantastic crypto news aggregator

>When LINK moons and everyone hears about how Jow Forums was the only place that knew-and that they knew from the beginning-newfags and normies will flood the board. It will stagnate and die
This unironically. Where can we go? The link node discord?

I've already filtered that bearwolf fag, if you start the same routine with LINK, ie. namefagging fud in every thread, I'll filter you too.

Attached: smug link.png (885x879, 220K)

6 months later still zero evidence smartcontract.com and we.trade are in any way connected other than the same plausible use case.

Same with project ubin.

Though we-trade.com has some new people it appears. Also hard to believe they'll be using it since they won't be using the ethereum blockchain and chainlink is still months from having even an ethereum main net, let alone one for whatever blockchain we.trade is using.

This larp is pretty convincingly busted in my mind.