How come it's not taboo to like Napoleon in France like it is to like Hitler in Germany...

How come it's not taboo to like Napoleon in France like it is to like Hitler in Germany? Do you think in 100 years hitler will have the same status as napoleon?

Attached: IMG_9257.jpg (311x473, 39K)

Cause Napoleon didn't do all the genocide stuff

Cause Napoleon didn't do all the genocide stuff

Cause Napoleon didn't do all the genocide stuff

because napoleon was a major cause for the democratization of europe while hitler's sole long lasting achievement was to give half of europe to the gommunists.

Attached: the nazi were based macro.jpg (1964x1304, 799K)

Cause Napoleon didn't do all the genocide stuff

Neither did Hitler.

>napoleon is literally hitlar!!!1!1!!

Attached: IMG_0968.png (408x406, 33K)

Attached: 1526897502092.jpg (450x600, 67K)

>Neither did Hitler.

Attached: IMG_6929.jpg (501x587, 80K)

because media was primitive and academia didn't have as much influence, Jews couldn't smear him as much.

Because Napoleon got lawmakers to write this big book and some others.

Attached: 500_F_77468743_sI5aKQNTB5L9YI6ozzUxSkr5DjIX7ePq.jpg (459x500, 59K)

All the same.

Attached: Napoleons_retreat_from_moscow.jpg (800x570, 281K)

based and redpilled

Attached: DfoGgMSUEAEZ2rN.jpg (709x660, 132K)

Wrong.
Hitler didn't reach Moscow, let alone force Russians to FLEE while burning their own capital lmfoa

All the same.
Enter the Russia. Get fucked.

Ideals of the revolution

is that so?

Attached: 1584583-download-1513323210-636-640x480[1].jpg (640x480, 52K)

Don't care. I could beat you up 1vs1, naked during Russian winter if I wanted to, faggot.

That's cause Napoleon literally did nothing wrong, Convict Anglo.

?

Attached: Screenshot_20180628-105221.jpg (1015x1486, 509K)

This
It's a well known fact that the average french citizen is worth 3 Russians in bare hand fighting

the post that triggered the entirety of france lmaooooo

Well, Napoleon reformed our country, to a system we still have and appreciate today.

Hitler destroyed Rotterdam, let Indonesia be invaded, starved Dutch people and murdered random people and jews. And gave us nothing positive in return.

I was only pretending to be angry though tbqh.

He did a whole lot of stuff all around Europe in fact, at least as far as Croatia

Because Napoleon's life story is incredible. Large parts of it are completely astonishing, like an action movie. Read about his escape from Corsica, when any normal man would have been captured and killed. And more and more insane stuff just keeps happening to him.

His influence itself went as far as Japan and Latin America. They adopted the same legal system as us.

>like an action movie

Attached: 1524438035905.jpg (500x500, 28K)

>like an action movie
No, no please America, don't make a biopic with The Rock portraying Napoléon
Please

Grande Armee in 1812 went on a single path towards Moscow, the Wehrmacht in 1941 advanced on a multiple thousand kilometer wide front reaching from the Baltic to the Black Sea

Attached: main-qimg-d20ca4c14e27c8bc15c2d41e03403573.png (503x333, 288K)

The germans meant to put into the grave every form of life they met, they had to spread their lines so harmless civilians don’t escape

La grande Foudre de guerre de France

Our troops did commit a lot of warcrimes, but your post is complete bullshit

One was a famous general that revolutionized warfare forever. The other, not so much.

I’m just joking
Why don’t you thank Napoléon for destroying the HRE once and for all therefore allowing german people to advance past the Middle Ages? Germans don’t think about this

Because Napoleon did nothing wrong

We live in a society

Attached: Map_of_the_Legal_systems_of_the_world_(en).png (3564x1870, 874K)

Napoleon only accelerated German unification, Germany was already very advanced despite the HRE. But he was a warmonger, an occupier and a guy that caused the death of a shitton of people

Because Napoleon was before modern propaganda usage

The majority of his wars were defensive, if only the autistic reactionnary monarchies of Europe didnt declare on him every year, there would have been a lot less dead people, yes.

>g*rmanic law
Eewww

come on, say it, dont be shy

Yeah many people like to say that but it's fairly simple to tell whether or not a war is defensive
If you wage the majority of your battles on foreign soil and annex tons of lands the wars tend to not be defensive

He was a living God and you shall rot in Hell for talking ill about him.
He will square things up with you germans once he’s resurrected, be sure of that

>Implying he'd want to lead Frankistan

Read Clausewitz, simpleton

Well if they're losing, a lot of battle is going to happen in foreign soil, and land annexation was about crippling them so they'd stop.

You have a problem with genocide?

Attached: t.jpg (1848x2520, 2.98M)

Bring it on motherfucker
Post revolutionary wars were expansionist offensive wars
Funnily enough even the first revolutionary war was declared by France

Attached: general-gebhard-leberecht-von-blucher-furst-von-wahlstatt-wahrend-der-schlacht-an-der-katzbach-am-26 (1300x1010, 284K)

Because Napoleon didn't base his conquest on ethnic cleansings and larpy racial theories

Why would jews smear napoleon? He was nice to them.

French women were so nice to Russian cossacks in 1814. No tinder involved.

Attached: large_b3f812edd4.jpg (859x643, 186K)

>always the same pictures posted by the same autistic Russian

French porn was funny.

Attached: Kosak2.jpg (515x808, 38K)

because he was italian and nobody hates Italians.

Attached: default__sized_l.jpg (500x699, 151K)

damn those kosaks look like superior KARA BOGA entities

But they were white.

Attached: tn_231648_72a86988c02f1.jpg (1397x1002, 167K)

Neither did based Gustav desu

>russe
>blanc
nul telle chose

Napoleon was a good guy. He was only killing Russians and Germans, but he liked Poles.

in the painting they all look swarthy as fuck, don't deny their nature you slavic mongrel