This is the Cherokee Tribal Council

Why do Native Americans in the US look so different than the ones in Latin America?

Attached: wildlife-600x334.jpg (600x334, 78K)

Tribal leaders usually try to intermarry with whites for money or connections

This is your average Cherokee

Attached: Cherokees.jpg (2500x1667, 1.16M)

Here are what the average Choctaw Indians look like

Attached: Choctaw-cityCouncil.jpg (480x244, 31K)

>5% native blood heritage fagging.

someone post a pic of that 1/64th native blood certificate

They look a lot different than "Mestizos" from Mexico. That's why I think its dubious to claim they have native heritage

I'm an Indian outlaw.
Half Cherokee and Choctaw, my baby she's a Chippewa...she's one of a kind...

Because they are closer to the equator you dipshit

>Why do Native Americans in the US look so different than the ones in Latin America?
same reason why finns look different from french and bantus look different from dogon:
we're all different you fucking racist

There are literal natives here that have blonde hair and blue eyes.

Please die retard

I dunno man. I've been to the Choctaw casino in Philadelphia, Mississippi, and that place is staffed by people who look like Indians from the old movies. Nothing white about most of them.

what a qt

imagine coming to conquer a new continent and finding it full of qt girls like her

You know its true

Think of every person you've met that has had native ancestry. A lot of them look no different than the average white person. Are you calling people who do that LARPers?

she's like 12% native at most

Finndians

I grew up with Natives and lived with them most my life
These people you're showing off as "The norm" are the sort of people that would've been kicked out of most tribes thirty years ago for being bleached to hell and back

kill yourself op

Isn't the average Mexican way more native than the average "native american" here?

Looks pretty brown to me m8. What makes you say that?

Shut up, fucks sake

I've never heard that before but it wouldn't be hard to believe that.

No? Most Mexicans are Spanish with some hybrids with the natives.

>I SWEAR BRUH NATIVE AMERICANS ARE BLONDE BLUE EYED AND WHITE

Attached: 200px-Le_56_Face.png (200x164, 44K)

>80% Spanish with looks completely devoid of Spanish blood but looks entirely like goblins
Yeah, beaners are definitely mostly Spanish

You know that many Spanish people look Moorish, no different than North Africans, right?

Most Mexicans you meet will say they are part Spanish and part North African

Yes, the original white man was native to what is now Massachusetts. That's why America is whiter than the rest of you.

Most "natives" aren't native, they have like a drop of native blood or at best they're half native. it's rare to see actual natives these days. They're a very, very small minority.

lmao they really don't, you've never been to spain have you?

They're larping. You should see our swarthy natives. Pure white hair and jewel-like blue eyes. Then they cry being oppressed. Bitch, you ten times more Aryan than me.

Have you ever been on a reservation? I haven't, but I imagine they're more common there.

No, but I'm just telling you what a lot of Chicanos tell me. And they're dead set on it.

>American natives

Attached: 1433a%20e.jpg (600x498, 34K)

I've been to Spain and the people I saw were almost as white as bongs.

I'm sorry but it's just not true. Spaniards are obviously swarthier than most Europeans but they do not look like North Africans.

That's because (mostly in northern spain) spanish people can be celtic, pretty similar to britbongs

Yeah weren't the Visigoths native to Iberia? It was one of those groups.

actual celts have curly black hair though? meme celts are anglo-saxons

Celts were a huge group of different tribes. I'm sure their appearances varied pretty widely.

>weren't the Visigoths native to Iberia?
actually no
but the Celtibers were, the ones that were absorbed by Roman conquest and colonization

obviously there'd be natives there, but I've also had the displeasure of meeting many "Cherokees" who are actually just white people with a distant Cherokee ancestor.

This is a Celt

Attached: 5af0cb64f863b3d8ac455e02e0b38b12--tom-jones-groups.jpg (198x302, 10K)

There's not one celtic look. Most celts were pale with light hair and eyes. Romans joked about putting chalk on their face to pretend like they were celts.

You remember than one wrong, they were talking about Gauls.

The Gauls were one tribe of Celts, I believe?

Most of those people look like white people

While that's true, the Spaniards that came to the new world were disproportionately Andalusian, and thus the darkest of Spaniards. That's why Latin American Spanish is basically Andalusian Spanish.

T. German expert in Native American genealogy and anthropology from university of Frankfurt

This is the only Celtic look there is

Attached: Mick_Foley_in_December_2016.jpg (1280x853, 166K)

Lot of Native Americans in the USA are more white than Native (aka whats called mestizo in Latin America but we don't have that word so we just call them how they want to identify)

Once again, I'm unsure whether the Finn is shitposting or retarded.

You are an idiot

>literally "no u"

Because rape is good for the skin.

well you are because you're talking to two posters

someone with 4chin Gold can verify

Attached: bCI7rdm.png (448x272, 16K)

All Finns might as well be the same poster t b h.

disgusting

based

Even the full blooded ones look different. Does a Greek look Dutch to you? The Native Groups are from a great distance away and didn't have the maritime backgrounds Europeans had.

>Think of every person you've met that has had native ancestry. A lot of them look no different than the average white person. Are you calling people who do that LARPers?
Because they are mixed and probably only an 1/8th native. The Native population was dwarfed by the old world immigrants. In CT we had ones that mixed with blacks and claimed the others were rascist to them.

>mexican will tell you hes part nafri
Lolololol

one look at her face is enough

The spaniards that went to the new world were primarily Castillians, Galicians and extremadurans.

Because they were genocided to extinction in the US, literally the only reason why people that are like 2% native american are still considered "native" there is because if they didn't count them, everyone would know that the US genocided them, gotta show some numbers in the census.

Attached: 56e55942749fe.jpg (700x560, 74K)

Those certificates saying you're 1/382nd Cherokee cost like $70

there's plenty of pure native american people still around

Yes, but not in the US, there's still a lot in latin america and their population is actually growing the fastest out of any other group in the Americas. I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't a single tribe in the US that is 90% native or more on average.

i was talking about the us, i'm pretty sure there's plenty in the southwest (like in new mexico, the average native is like 75% native), alaska and the western plain states

No? I mean well, it depends. Some people have a family record with more indigenous people. Some people have more Spanish people in their ancestry. Some have wild fucking shit like Japanese or German or shit (like menonites here in Chihuahua).

We're very, very mixed due to our history. It's normal for families to have a shitton of different skin tones.

Attached: 1473732445751.png (900x907, 144K)

>there's plenty in the southwest
Really doubt they're full blooded, and if they are, they would be an absolutely tiny minority of an already tiny minority and living in extreme poverty, all the governments across the continent purposefully ignore native americans and the US is not an exception. It's pretty ironic considering that the US is the cradle of "social justice" and they always pander to blacks, gay people, etc but always ignore or don't give a shit about the only minority that has real problems in the US (they're the poorest race there).

You killed them all, there weren't many to begin with

Same happened in argentina, i don't think we ever had more than 100k indians even before columbus.

Maybe they are vinland / early irish settlement rapebabies

>i was talking about the us, i'm pretty sure there's plenty in the southwest (like in new mexico, the average native is like 75% native), alaska and the western plain states
Yeah SW and Alaska still have pure bloods. Some of the Midwest is s supposed to have them.

Why didn't USA have mestizo for a word?

Attached: 1523231138280.jpg (480x405, 46K)

Not full blooded, largely due to the efforts of your clergry to intermarry them with spanish convicts and criminals. Also natives in New Mexico only exist because once America moved in, racemixing became illegal and racemixed children could be legally discriminated against by people other than the father.

The US government doesn't ignore wagon burners, individual states do. Native Americans can pretty much get free admission to any college in America, especially Ivy Leagues, because the Feds tell everyone to affirmative action them (however full-blooded indians outside America do not get such benefits and are lumped in with spics or asians depending on the region).

because racemixing was banned so if you had a mixed race kid it was called a mutt and not allowed into the white school while the white parent alienated from normal society for being unclean

in coastal areas (re: california) this is also why there are so many pure chinese whereas there are mixed race people in places like hong kong or singapore

Thanks. Heard about it but never really thought about it.

Yes

I think sometimes appearances can be deceiving. I have a friend from El Salvador who I think looks pretty white, he looks kinda like Jonah Hill. Light skin, green eyes, can grow a beard, and I think his facial structure looks whitish too and people speak English to him. He's an Argentinaboo and one time he took me to a cafe to eat steak. I went in first and the waitress spoke Spanish to me but when he came she switched to English lmao. His little brother even has red hair.

Anyways he took a DNA result and I thought it was interesting because he's like 44% native American from El Salvador, like 42% Southern European with 20% being from Portugal and some black dna.

Because they are more white than native at this point.
many of those guys are just straight up castizos.

In latin America, Native genes are much more pronounced, and the raping and genocide of the natives wasn't as bad.

Blood Quantum lol.

>Because they are more white than native at this point.
>many of those guys are just straight up castizos.
>In latin America, Native genes are much more pronounced, and the raping and genocide of the natives wasn't as bad.
The Navajo look pretty un-white. Some look pretty Asian.

Attached: 7988544494_e6262bb85e_b.jpg (1024x682, 362K)

Higher percentage of bleaching

>native americans are mongoloids
>european settlers and conquistadors in their yellow fever lust created mestizos and castizos
The future of canada and australia