Based

Based.

Attached: Dg0CKO8U0AAuwTu.jpg (501x206, 21K)

Other urls found in this thread:

twitteraudit.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

and redpilled.

>no BBC or Al Jazeera
based

Is he saying the enemies of the American people aren't his enemies?

Attached: Thinking_Face_Emoji.png (640x640, 111K)

Not based and not redpilled.

>No Fox
>No RT
>No Breitbart

Attached: Drumpf.png (1569x986, 895K)

RT has good reporting

rt is legit

Attached: DDgEI_IXYAAu8pw.jpg (915x1200, 119K)

>Reuters and AP in the 60s

Absolute joke of an "audit". Who did it, Breitbart?

lmao nice arguments you absolute loser
twitteraudit.com/

News outlets not owned by the Kremlin:
>“It is certainly consistent with the intelligence advice that we received 12 months ago, that Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 had been shot down by a surface-to-air missile.”

RT:
>“it is certainly consistent with all that we were told, the advice that we received two months ago, that flight MH17 had been shot down by a... missile.”

Attached: 1526002640891.png (604x618, 14K)

This isn't talking about fake news, retard. It's about how many bots are following those twitter accounts.

yeah no shit you low IQ faggot, it literally says real/fake followers

Then why are you posting it if you know that? It's of absolutely zero relevance. It has no bearing on the accuracy of RT's reporting whatsoever.

because rt doesn't need to create bots to follow them so they can feel relevant. they are more genuine. i know it's hard to understand for your tiny british brain

so true
sadly people dont take this warning seriously

All the ones in your image still have more real followers than RT (counting both RT's real and fake ones), regardless of the supposed bots flagged by some random third-party service.

Still not relevant to the quality of reporting

>why doesn't he bring up non-American news stations

Americans have finally become honduras-tier.

do you really expect a russian channel to have more followers in the west than mainstream news outlets? are you fucking retarded? it just shows that they rely less on bot followers than their western counterparts

One again, see

>a mass shooting happens in the usa
>amerimutts instead of mourning the victims use the opportunity to blame it on muh left or muh right wing nazis

fucking hell

No, I don't expect some Russian state propaganda outlet to have more followers than independent news outlets, and I'm glad it doesn't.

Attached: 1511055936426.png (621x440, 59K)

i've seen your post already you mong. but that wasn't my point to begin with

good, then stop getting on my nerves with your low IQ posts

Dinlad Treemp

YEAAAAAAH MEDIA
KILL'EM
FAKE NEWS

Attached: 1528847033597.jpg (300x203, 19K)

He does love you saudi terrorists.

Attached: 1523726572131.jpg (300x168, 9K)

When you go back to Russia.

Attached: 1513961135127.png (1469x8151, 1.68M)

>g-g-g-go back
not an argument you worthless subhuman

Attached: great britain.png (1192x1885, 1.56M)

Attached: 1513313790803.jpg (1649x1535, 601K)

Relevant to the quality of the company.

>155K likes

Attached: hillbillies.jpg (960x525, 113K)

>i post actual news articles and scientific studies
>the brit subhuman posts some cherry picked photos
you're not really good at making arguments m8

>news organizations are untrustworthy if foreign powers spend resources posting propaganda on their social media
How does that make sense?

ok, here's some studies for you

Attached: 1511391937651.jpg (3488x538, 410K)

The chart is about bots on their accounts.

>2004
wow, really up-to data figures you got there . why not just posting some stats from 1400 if we're at it

Attached: 1521498340726.png (640x639, 44K)

Exactly. Why would Russia focus on sending trolling bots on their own propaganda outlets?

>No PBS
Truly

dunno, maybe to increase their social media influence and number of re-tweets & shares?

>trolling bots
What the hell are you even babbling on.

Anyway, follower numbers and likes make accounts more visible.

>source:
Also, not all of those are from 2004.

Here's 2015's homicide statistics anyway showing that Russia is still worse than Africa-tier.

Russia: 10.82 per 100,000
UK: 1.20 per 100,000
Nigeria: 9.85 per 100,000

Attached: 1511214525078.png (863x443, 103K)

Truly the best president of all time.

all journalists need to fucking hang

Since Putin came to power, homicide rate fell more than four times. Guess when Putin will finally retire, it will become west europe tier.

high murder rates are an indicator of a healthy and masculine society. people like you would be killed in russia and that's a good thing

If that helps you sleep at night. Speaking of which, I'm off to bed. Try not to overdose on krokodil, okay?

Attached: 1520033167975.jpg (526x474, 144K)

Also during Putin rule GDP PPP got three times higher, and nominal GDP got ~8 times higher. Putin is a saviour of Russia after all.

sleep tight kiddo

let’s all listen to fox and breitbart instead my fellow pedes

That's just embarrassing desu.

This isn’t that surprising. Why would Russia need bots on its state run media? If your trying to cause turmoil go for the big boys

so russian bots are helping cnn etc. get bigger?

Overfeed it until it will burst.

Donload Trnp

What’s the problem? the RT version is more accurate to reality

CNN isn't an indie newspaper and doesn't need Twitter to thrive. Most of its boomer audience probably doesn't even know about social media.

Deenlad Trnup

blopliptripoloza btfo. White supremacists crying right now.

Bait and sage.

Theyre completely unreliable on russian shit but thats expected. Honestly Al Jazeera has the best reporting by far (they hire all the good british talent).