Based.
Based
Other urls found in this thread:
and redpilled.
>no BBC or Al Jazeera
based
Is he saying the enemies of the American people aren't his enemies?
Not based and not redpilled.
>No Fox
>No RT
>No Breitbart
RT has good reporting
rt is legit
>Reuters and AP in the 60s
Absolute joke of an "audit". Who did it, Breitbart?
lmao nice arguments you absolute loser
twitteraudit.com
News outlets not owned by the Kremlin:
>“It is certainly consistent with the intelligence advice that we received 12 months ago, that Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 had been shot down by a surface-to-air missile.”
RT:
>“it is certainly consistent with all that we were told, the advice that we received two months ago, that flight MH17 had been shot down by a... missile.”
This isn't talking about fake news, retard. It's about how many bots are following those twitter accounts.
yeah no shit you low IQ faggot, it literally says real/fake followers
Then why are you posting it if you know that? It's of absolutely zero relevance. It has no bearing on the accuracy of RT's reporting whatsoever.
because rt doesn't need to create bots to follow them so they can feel relevant. they are more genuine. i know it's hard to understand for your tiny british brain
so true
sadly people dont take this warning seriously
All the ones in your image still have more real followers than RT (counting both RT's real and fake ones), regardless of the supposed bots flagged by some random third-party service.
Still not relevant to the quality of reporting
>why doesn't he bring up non-American news stations
Americans have finally become honduras-tier.
do you really expect a russian channel to have more followers in the west than mainstream news outlets? are you fucking retarded? it just shows that they rely less on bot followers than their western counterparts
One again, see
>a mass shooting happens in the usa
>amerimutts instead of mourning the victims use the opportunity to blame it on muh left or muh right wing nazis
fucking hell
No, I don't expect some Russian state propaganda outlet to have more followers than independent news outlets, and I'm glad it doesn't.
i've seen your post already you mong. but that wasn't my point to begin with
good, then stop getting on my nerves with your low IQ posts
Dinlad Treemp
YEAAAAAAH MEDIA
KILL'EM
FAKE NEWS
He does love you saudi terrorists.
When you go back to Russia.
>g-g-g-go back
not an argument you worthless subhuman
Relevant to the quality of the company.
>155K likes
>i post actual news articles and scientific studies
>the brit subhuman posts some cherry picked photos
you're not really good at making arguments m8
>news organizations are untrustworthy if foreign powers spend resources posting propaganda on their social media
How does that make sense?
ok, here's some studies for you
The chart is about bots on their accounts.
>2004
wow, really up-to data figures you got there . why not just posting some stats from 1400 if we're at it
Exactly. Why would Russia focus on sending trolling bots on their own propaganda outlets?
>No PBS
Truly
dunno, maybe to increase their social media influence and number of re-tweets & shares?
>trolling bots
What the hell are you even babbling on.
Anyway, follower numbers and likes make accounts more visible.
>source:
Also, not all of those are from 2004.
Here's 2015's homicide statistics anyway showing that Russia is still worse than Africa-tier.
Russia: 10.82 per 100,000
UK: 1.20 per 100,000
Nigeria: 9.85 per 100,000
Truly the best president of all time.
all journalists need to fucking hang
Since Putin came to power, homicide rate fell more than four times. Guess when Putin will finally retire, it will become west europe tier.
high murder rates are an indicator of a healthy and masculine society. people like you would be killed in russia and that's a good thing
If that helps you sleep at night. Speaking of which, I'm off to bed. Try not to overdose on krokodil, okay?
Also during Putin rule GDP PPP got three times higher, and nominal GDP got ~8 times higher. Putin is a saviour of Russia after all.
sleep tight kiddo
let’s all listen to fox and breitbart instead my fellow pedes
That's just embarrassing desu.
This isn’t that surprising. Why would Russia need bots on its state run media? If your trying to cause turmoil go for the big boys
so russian bots are helping cnn etc. get bigger?
Overfeed it until it will burst.
Donload Trnp
What’s the problem? the RT version is more accurate to reality
CNN isn't an indie newspaper and doesn't need Twitter to thrive. Most of its boomer audience probably doesn't even know about social media.
Deenlad Trnup
blopliptripoloza btfo. White supremacists crying right now.
Bait and sage.
Theyre completely unreliable on russian shit but thats expected. Honestly Al Jazeera has the best reporting by far (they hire all the good british talent).