One of the biggest criticisms of Chainlink has been that the team rarely makes announcements and that the extent to which they are partnered with large enterprises like SWIFT and Microsoft hasn't been properly explained. From a surface level view it would appear that Chainlink is not partnered with these enterprises as the team has not stated explicitly that this is the case. However, when you dig deeper into the nature of their relationships with these enterprises it becomes evident that there is much more going on behind the scenes than is being disclosed.
SWIFT has already confirmed that they will be implementing smart contracts to make their bond payments and Microsoft Bletchley cryptlets are clearly designed to work within Chainlink's network. Chainlink has confirmed that they have worked with both of these parties on these endeavors.
The high IQ investor can interpret the nature of these relationships with ease. What has or hasn’t been stated publicly is clearly irrelevant when matched against the work that has already been done. If a road is being built by a construction company with funds from the state government, but the state government hasn't publicly announce the contract, the public obviously doesn't have to wait on an announcement from the state government to know they are building a new road.
However, relationships like these where some degree of ambiguity is present have proven to paralyze a certain class of investors with confusion and doubt. This “brainlet” class of investors cannot apprehend the nature of reality primarily because they are “word thinkers”. Word thinkers use labels and word definitions to create the illusion of rational thinking. Labels like “partnership” provide more useful information to this class of investor than actual work that has already taken place. To them, words speak louder than actions.
If you find yourself falling into the latter camp, I would urge you to read through AssBlaster’s past threads. AssBlaster is often dismissed as a LARPer, and while this may very well be the case, the most useful insight he provided to Jow Forums was that Chainlink is an industry token from the ground up and that you, the average investor, were not supposed to be involved. While the specifics of this “insider information” are spurious its saving grace is that it illustrates the nature of Chainlink’s relationships with large enterprises like SWIFT and Microsoft in terms that the brainless class investor can easily understand. When a large enterprise is working on an important project that will give them a significant competitive advantage they are not inclined to provide more information to the public than is absolutely necessary.
yeah none of this shit matters because normies arent fomo'ing in and making us rich. stfu and kill yourself. sage
Blake White
this. they do not need to market because Sergey and co cater to billion dollar enterprises, not your average Joe Schmoe Investor with his paltry $5k.
Isaac Cox
lol at you thinking LINK needs normies. normies will fomo in after the fact, but in no way shape or form does this project require redditors to "pump" the token. if your priority is "making us rich" why don't you just buy the top of EOS. its clearly where your dumb money belongs
Zachary Murphy
soooo short-sighted, lmao. be a good little goy and buy EOS at ATH.
Nolan Scott
why dont you just buy EOS now.
William Scott
Nobody knows about link buddy. The threads you see are about 10-30 people on here that probably have a mental disorder and a degenerate lifestyle. If you saw these people in real life you'd stay far far away from whatever they're involved in. Believe me, ChainLink isn't a sure bet and the dots you see being connect are completely based on "hope" these companies are indirectly talking about ChainLink itself.
Eli Allen
cope
Asher Cox
your right about every single thing, and i hold 70k. i hold more link than any of you bullshit poorfag cunts that are making excuses and coping. kill yourselves srs
Leo Perez
>mental disorder the people who come into LINK threads and constantly spit out baseless fud that remotely makes no sense are the ones who have a serious disability. they have an agenda and would rather waste time by trying to discredit a legitimate corporate backed project than putting their efforts into researching fundamentals of any other project in the crypto space. these people have no fucking life.
Lincoln Diaz
No, Linkies are delusional. They have to dream up these nebulous connections to big time companies because they can't live with the fact that they poured their life savings into a shit project with a 2 man dev team that has done absolutely shit in an entire year while everything around it went to the stars.
You guys are not smarter than everyone else. You're fucking retarded. Nobody is buying because LINK had a 1 in 1000 chance at success and they completely squandered it.
Jason Kelly
You're going to sell at $12 because like a degenerate gambler, you're pathetic and ruled by emotion.
>ChainLink isn't a sure bet
This illustrates why being able to contend with ambiguity in the world is so important. Literally nothing is a sure bet and everything is ruled by probability. Nobody with an IQ over 130 would make a statement.
>Nobody knows about link buddy
That's the point. Only industry leaders with influence do.
Juan Sanchez
this is what im talking about.
>2 dev team >completely squandered it. >done absolutely shit in an entire year
>larps about all kinds of partnerships and connections in Brussels >I don't know anymore than Jow Forums does Why is Jow Forums listening to this faggot again?
This is the remedial class for brainlet no-linkers thread.
Aaron Morales
The Comm-Gap is actually a great feature of this project, because it keeps idiots out (thereby keeping the price low enough for those of us who actually understand the project and don't need our hands held to accumulate more).
Camden Long
I would tend to agree, but my frustration comes from not being able to have a discussion about Chainlink's connections to large enterprises on Jow Forums without the whole thing being derailed by skeptical brainlets. The number of brainlets who could get in early by having the Comm-Gap bridged for them is pretty small, wouldn't move the price much, and would dramatically improve the discourse on Jow Forums.
I bought 100 LINK for my 2 year old son today. I will give it to him when he turns 18
Xavier Green
>Giving your 18 yo son $10m
Asher Rodriguez
>T-t-thx dad, what can I do with it >Well son, you knew in the old days I was pretty active on the world wide web. There was a place that always posted anime and I was quite fond of it. >They told me to buy this token with the promise of making me rich. >Well it was all a joke in the end, I learned a valuable lesson. Never invest with money you can't loose. >I'm sorry I can't help you pay for university
>improve discourse on Jow Forums You realize how silly what you just said sounds, right? Jow Forums is a cesspool, thank God, and the more brainlets (and shrewd accumulators) I watch fudding the shit out of LINK, the stronger the buy signals I see. I used to feel like you, user, but now I hardly feel at all... just enough to recognize things for what they are when I see them. >stop helping those who ridicule you and the things you care about
>the more brainlets (and shrewd accumulators) I watch fudding the shit out of LINK, the stronger the buy signals I see
I agree with this but I'm done accumulating for now. I'd rather have discussions about what's going on behind the scenes and progress that's being made.
>stop helping those who ridicule you and the things you care about
This is a good point.
Alexander Price
100 LINK BOUNTY!
So i Have this code in my crowdsale contract. It withdraws 500k Tokens just like it should. But the problem is that anyone can call it. How do i change it so only the creator of the contract / one address can withdraw?
function withdrawTokens() public { uint256 amount = 1500000000000000000000000; require(amount > 0); _deliverTokens(msg.sender, amount); }
Brandon Howard
You don't even own that 72k LINK, Binance does. They are just allowing you to use on their exchange.
Justin Martinez
Didn't read.
Jace Clark
yeah dude, get your fuckin LINKs off the exchange asap. you trying to get chinked?
Aiden Williams
No fucking idea about that piece of shit Solidity is, but I guess you can hardcode the msg.receiver or whatever is called with the address you want.
Gabriel Russell
you need something like an onlyOwner modifer, it would look like:
