Be fennoswede but still autistic due to the negative influence of finnish speaking subhumans around me

>be fennoswede but still autistic due to the negative influence of finnish speaking subhumans around me

Attached: 4b6.jpg (600x515, 13K)

You're a Finn, not a Swede

>be handsome but live among disgustingly ugly subhumans

Attached: 1452293506299.jpg (400x262, 31K)

You are a Swede because of Rurik. Everyone is a Swede. You are a Volga Swede of the Kievan Rus. I am Swedeo-Karelian Greek from Savolaks.

Rurik was Finn

Attached: pepe1.jpg (306x306, 20K)

And Finns are Swedes. Which makes Rurik a Swede ( Finn ) from Sweden. We are all Swedes. How are you doing my brother

Rurik was a fucking barbarian without national identity. He wasn't able to be a swede or a finn until swedes and finns became real.

Attached: Cheekibreeki.jpg (205x204, 10K)

I am Karelian, not Swedoid

Attached: partajäbä6.jpg (2736x3648, 2.07M)

Swedes existed as an identifiable people in the 6th Century and possibly as early as the 1st Century. Muh no national identities until the 19th Century is a total meme.

So you are Russian :DD

I too am Karelian. I am a Karjala-Swede

>mfw

Attached: 12617622.jpg (439x419, 45K)

>everyone is a swede
> max trips
I am a Hungaro-Swede, how are you doing my brothers?

>Savonians are now Karelians
Swedo-Finnish education.

you cute, white boy.

Attached: he small.png (20x20, 1K)

Ah, very nice.

I am Karjala-Savolaks Fenno-Swede who doesn't speak Swedish from the Ostrobothian part of Tavastia

Nah it is not, do you even know what nationality means? That's not about ethnicity, language and even culture, look on Australia. If a bunh of dirty vikings were calling themselves (or rather were called by somebody else) swedes it doesn't mean that these "swedes" are identical to what and who we are calling "swedes" nowadays. Like Egyptians, Greeks,(so called) Rus' people and so on. Like the tribe of Belges and Belgians, you know.

This. OP is just projecting his own flaws. Ultimate beta.

>That's not about ethnicity, language and even culture
It literally is, though.
>a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular state or territory

This to be desu

Attached: swedish to the core.png (859x370, 32K)

This

Haplogroup means jack shit

>wikipedia is my source of knowledge
ok then. it is a political identity, there are many examples of nations which unite people with
a) different languages
b) different descent
c) different cultures
d) different territory

Two hundred years ago France was a giant asshole where people couldn't understand each other without a translator while travelling to the nearest village. Read some Braudel or smth.

Same with Italy. Same with Ukraine. Russia, Germany. That's fucking obvious that nationality is a political identity. It can be built on things like ethnicity, language and culture but that's not a rule, that's only one way.

Fucking reptilian

Attached: mitä.jpg (820x547, 42K)

U ugly

Genes barely matter. Culture still remains throughout the years even though it changes a bit, for example swedes still eat 3rd world tier food even though they are a 1st world country.

Another example is Shemu festival in Egypt, Shemu was practiced by egyptian pagans where they would offer fesikh(dried fish) to their gods during the spring. Nowadays, most egyptians celebrate Shemu(or Shem Ennisim) regardless of religion.

I guess that's what you're talking about. I am not very sure since your wording is awkward.

I understand that languages change but the people still remain the same.

>wikipedia is my source of knowledge
The Oxford dictionary is the most important dictionary of the English language. It's the best source of knowledge I could possibly use.

Also, I think you're confusing the concepts of nation, state, and country. Nationality can be shaped by the latter two but a nation by definition has no relation to any political unit. The Swedish nation does have continuity dating back to the 6th Century. Some national identities are far younger than others, the ones you listed happen to be examples.

>Genes
That's not about genes, at least if you're not using the metaphorical meaning of this word. It's about culture. But that doesn't work in that way in all cases. There is such thing as rapture and these happen all the time. It can be caused be genocides, assimilation, merger and so on. And when two groups act in some of this way towards another one - they both won't remain same as before. You see? And almost every group experience these raptures throughout its history. Everything changes and we can find some relations between people who lived in Egypt 3000 years ago and who live in Egypt today only if we really want to do it, but in othet cases we must understand that these two groups are quite different and almost independent from each other because everything changed.

Saying opposite is like saying that Russian revolution was a consequence of the Neolithic revolution. Well, somehow it is right. But it would be quite stupid to say things in that way.

>The Oxford dictionary is the most important dictionary
Genera English dictionary shouldn't be a source in this case, you know why? Because it is very narrow question and it is debatable even among specialists in this field. So you should read some special papers instead.

What you are talking about is prescribing in hindsight man. Swedes as a nation were created in 18-19 centuries and then their historians created a myth about united sweden people to confirm their own identity. That's how it works. When I am talking about myth I don't mean that this is lie and they "hide the real history", I think that every historical narrative is constructed in some way and it is only one way to speak about history and the past. But in this case I'm sure that national narrative is mostly false and quite harmful in modern conditions.

>raptures
ruptures, I'm sorry

>Swedes as a nation were created in 18-19 centuries and then their historians created a myth about united sweden people to confirm their own identity.
Not really, this sounds more like something which should be applied to the likes of Germany which has a very young and "manufactured" national identity and lacked any unified German state until the 19th Century. But Sweden has been a unified nation since around the 12th Century and the peoples that made up this old Kingdom (for example the Geats) quickly became part of the Swedish nation, definitely far earlier than the 19th Century. Links to the the Swedes of Anqituity and the early Middle Ages are debatable but otherwise the Swedish national identity was in no way manufactured.

>Finns are Swedes
I bet you dont even understand a single word of pic related, except for the obvious one you retard.
People like you are the reason why nobody likes Sweden

Attached: ddd0ykim.jpg (575x438, 33K)

>Two hundred years ago France was a giant asshole where people couldn't understand each other without a translator while travelling to the nearest village.
>Same with Italy. Same with Ukraine. Russia, Germany.
Guess what? It wasn't the same in Sweden, excluding certain regions.