If they went to war with each other who would win?

SK has a lot bigger trained reserve.
Although they probably wouldn't have enough force projection to succesfully land in Japan.

>who would win?
the jews

Depends on which time period. Today I would say Korea.

Is it safe to say it would be a stalemate? This is considering that neither one of them would be able to raid each others land and all that would really happen is the destruction of major cities and loss of life?

>koreans cant land on japan due to inferior navy
>japanese cant land on korea due to inferior army

yea its a stalemate like germany vs britain during ww2

China wins.
This isn't even a hard question. Both sides lose and China's greatest, local counterweight in East Asia is now Vietnam.

merchant of death thinks about money-making.

One on one? Japan, more resources and a bigger economy, more patriotic, and a geographic advantage.

history has shown navy beats army. ground troops do little against a blockade

Pretty metal there dude

yea and korea has shit tons of missiles while japan does not, we can either launch them at ships or even attack japan it self from seoul.

Japan has a pretty nice navy for its size

US arms manufacturers.

They're both basically American vassal states so we'd probably intervene and get them to knock it off.

>implying Japan isn't capable of building and fielding as many missiles as they want or convert their reactors to build nukes

China unironically
Asian influence is gone for both nations means a monopoly of China in Asia
Every ASEAN cunts will be like Duterte and Indians will extend their superpower 2030 aim to reguonal power 3020

>implying gooks cant make nukes them selves
holyshit dude our guys up north already made those while eating grass off the ground

also
>japan making offensive missiles
they literally cant make those because they got cucked from losing to america in ww2.
unless if were factoring out the treaties then both country will just make fucking nukes and end up killing each other real fast

china

it has taken nk 40 years to build what little stockpile it has today. sk has 0 nuclear capability, who are you fooling

>oecd average is unweighted
shit "info"graphics

South Korea, how is it even a question.

North would come to their help. In case of defensive wear they know they woudl be next and would get a lot of pconcessions from the Souht once war is won and in case of offensive war to get their share of the bounty.

holyshit and japan have nuke capability because they have nuclear reactors that south korea also have? also how the fuck are they gonna make balistic missiles when theyve been cucked from making those since ww2

north korea doesn't have functional nuclear power plants and south korea does
if you have a nuclear power plant you can start a nuclear weapons program fairly easily

oh and remember those nuclear plants that japan has? yea korean missiles can probobly target those from the start so what now ?