1. Your country

Marriage should not be a political issue.

If some church wants to marry homos, I don't care. If people from some other church want to think that homo marriages are illegitimate, I don't care. Muh morals and muh feelings need to fuck off out of politics and law for good.

stop spreading lies

it's all about having the same taxation benefits AND the same social status, not just civil partnerships

Attached: tumblr_nhii76zfbA1sn7ukjo2_1280.jpg (1086x720, 67K)

>when are Russians not wasted
That's a stereotype, I'll get fucked up any chance I can even if I was born in Vatican.

When will Italy change its mind?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Europe

Define the meaning of marriage

The daily reminder that Finns are faggots

not with the current government, but hey, at least we can get united.

as a homo being able to have the same kind of marriage as heteros, what's so difficult to understand here? there are still countries left in Europe, where it's not equal, see

Please read my question again:

What is the meaning of marriage?

Now you're asking a different question...
Meaning doesn't matter, as it means different things for various people.
What is the meaning of life?

North-eastern 'Merica
Marriage is religious in nature, if a church wants to be heretical and allow "marriage" for homosexuals then so shall it be.

The marriage was invented by heteros to keep their society running. More kids, even more kids. This institution helped to keep STD's at low. Mothers and kids got protection. Adultery was a crime.

Now, you faggots want to hijack it.

>What is the meaning of life?
It is in having children, grandchildren etc.

so straight people who can't have children should kill themselves?

Finns are

Marriage exists between a man and a woman. It doesn't matter what you call it if two fags want to buttfuck on the regular, but it's not marriage. The law should reflect this.

Marriage sounds pretty gay.

They can marry, but not adopt.

>im apathetic hear how based i am!!1

Attached: 1526459731974.png (1159x665, 231K)

ok, Yussuf

Contra, because (a) it's pointless and (b) it's obviously a milestone towards child adoption. A kid shouldn't have two fathers, it's bound to make him a weirdo.

and children growing up with a slutty single mom are no weirdos? polish logic

lets not add poo to an already expired dinner

Flag
I don't give a fuck, and it should be a non-issue, but since this is a matter of legal benefits someone doesn't have for no reason, lets say I support it.

Where did you get the idea I'm defending single mothers?
Let me reiterate: a kid needs a father and a mother, and not shitty ones. The law should promote this.

I'm pro gay, but I'm against faggots who have the need to show everyone that they're gay.

>a kid needs a father and a mother, and not shitty ones
did you read this bullshit in the bible? because it's not true
>The law should promote this
ah, so denying gay people the rights will make them straight... thanks for this flawless logic, once again

>This institution helped to keep STD's at low. Mothers and kids got protection. Adultery was a crime.
Woah, I guess it was very successful at it

Attached: 1502887512524.png (1274x581, 39K)

1. Yes
2. Pro. The institution of marrige must be dismantled to crush any vestiges of christian/nationalist power and force the population to accept multiracial integration

>homo marriage
kill all fags
kill'em

Millions of years of Evolution btfo

Isn't homosexuality a consequence of evolution too? Or did it come out of thin air?

So is malaria but neither of these propagage the species

>make retarded argument once
>makes retarded argument again

I guess heterosexual infertile couples should get their marriage anulled then

Attached: 1524243625843.jpg (541x541, 33K)

>Millions of years of Evolution
ah yes, the millions of years of evolution, where the mother would sit at home, watching over her children and taking them to kindergarten and school, while the father is working 9till5. MILLIONS OF YEARS

Why? I was talking about how fags dont make parents.

Poland
I'm a faggot so I'm pro

Your criteria for marriage is arbitrary and leaves out a good chunk of people like for no good reason. Some conservatives even tried to overturn gay marriage and adoption here with that argument and got promptly shot down by the courts for being retarded.

Whats so hard to understand marriage is a time-honored biblical tradition between a man and a woman, and fags shouldnt raise kids because we want the kids to turn into functional people

not the other colombian guy but at least i hope you aren't the "omg does that girl have a dick? hot XD" kind

I would like to be married someday.

Attached: 1466032240592.jpg (499x499, 140K)

This. If you want to have gay butt sex and vastly increase your chance of AIDS good on you I hope they never find the cure anyway. But marriage as we know it in Western society was established Biblically between a man and a woman and faggots try to take the rules ofnthe Bible and bend them to their faggotry will. Let’s be non-religious and be scientific about this too: homosexuality does absolutely nothing to further the human species in fact it causes it to decline in birth rates and increased chance of AIDS. Literally God and science both disagree with homos so your feelings matter for nothing. Stupid sensitive queers. I hope Russia starts the next world war already.

You already could as long as you did it properly

SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE MOTHERFUCKER.

Also
>letting lunatics who hold grudges over millenia about where the essence of Christ (whatever that means) comes from dictate public policy

Attached: 1500978519170.jpg (700x714, 136K)

Against.

1) Marriage is for having children. Gays can't have children nor should they be allowed to adopt as this would deprive the child of a natural mother and father.

2) Marriage is a Sacrament ordained by our Lord Jesus Christ who defined it as between one man and one woman.

So do you support stripping single parents of their kids?

No because Single Parenthood isn't by legal design. Gay adoption is.

What about bisexual people/closeted gays who have children and then later decide to get a partner of the same sex?

>our Lord Jesus Christ
You probably meant Mohammed and Allah

gays are alright, but only twinks

Attached: 1529429498569.jpg (744x960, 45K)

Again, that would be social not legal and therefore not by legal design. And yes, there should be social stigma attached to raising your child with a new partner of the same gender.

Do you even know what that means? Also there is no seperation outside burgerstan

1.
2. dont care

marriage means nothing to homos (other than getting some government benefits) since open relationships are common in gay marriages.

twinks don't have a beard and are more skinny (and faggy)

I can smell the repression from here.

BASED
A
S
E
D

God damn that's edgy!

1. Flag
2. Pro. I support equal rights for all groups.

>there should be social stigma attached to raising your child with a new partner of the same gender.
You don't sound like a nice person. Keep in mind this belief that gay-raised children turn out bad is based entirely not on evidence

>You don't sound like a nice person.
Caring about the well being of children makes you not nice?

traps are not gay

polygamists can get married too for all i care. but ideally i don't think marriage should be a political institution to begin with.

Against. 'Marriage' is a biblical term. Marriage shouldn't be political or litigious in any way. Calling is gay marriage is an oxymoron, should be called gay unionship or something. Have no problem with them recognizing their love, 300% have a problem with them redefining christianity to do it. Take your degeneracy elsewhere.

You want to attach social stigma to these children and their parents and pretend like you're doing them a favour. It's the exact kind of stupidity that puritans and SJWs fall into - acting like a bully because you think your position is so righteous.

People get married all the time who don't even believe in god.

who defines christianity if not the church? and there are churches that recognize gay marriage. not advocating for or against it, but just pointing out that your logic is flawed.

I bet you have never met someone who was raised by gay parents. Whenever I see people like you, I have to think of the American Dad episode and then be reminded that it's not satire and that people are really like that. One would think that the time of enlightenment was more than 200 years ago, but apparently the message hasn't reached everyone yet. Can religion please die...

Attached: 1233788464667.jpg (604x483, 39K)

No, not agreeing with his opinion does. Good thing most people on this board will die kissless virgins so his kind can die out.

Marriage wasn't invented by and isn't owned by any church. It's not exactly a ground-breaking concept which is why it pops up all over the world in different formats.

Damn that’s edgy atheist boi. I’m sure all the pagans and atheists throughout time left huge swathes of knowledge behind for all mankind. Don’t be so ignorant kid, see the world as it is.

>b-but muh animu waifuuuu

If you honestly think Christianity caused the "Dark Ages" you need to off yourself

Pro. Marriage ceased to be a solely religious union a long time ago, the argument of it only belonging to a man and a woman because muh God said so is a meme spread by people who just hate gays or still live in a country that actually only marries out of duty and not love. Most people who marry here nowadays don't care about the religion, it's about being legally bound together.

ok, let us hear... what do you think caused the "Dark Ages" and the HUGE technological and social advancements during the year 0 till 1750 in Europe... GO!

Attached: 1474233509560.png (3630x1615, 783K)

trips confirmed

beyond autism

How about the fucking collapse of the Roman empire

>there is no seperation outside burgerstan
Are you 12?

Many many countries all over europe has state religions, something that would contradict the separation thing. And even in the US theyve had prayer hours in public schools and such, because the separation of church and state was never meant to be the autistic secularism we have today

I'm against forcing churches to do gay marriage, civil unions however should be done by whoever is of legal age and consenting.

Leave America out of your vodka-addled posts. You have no idea what you're talking about.

What I said is true though

No particular individual church is ever required to marry two men or two women, if that's what your afraid of. And in America, tons of people have their weddings at a location other than a church.

Pretty much this.

Why do gay people keep scoffing at the thought of not calling what they have marriage then? Is it solely a wording thing? Why can't they be happy with "civil union" if it has the exact same effects as a legally binding contract?

>Hello, I'd like to introduce you my civil union partner, XYZ
>Hello, I'd like to introduce you my husband, XYZ
choose one

Attached: tumblr_p2plyqCwqB1rb8m50o1_1280.jpg (640x813, 47K)

No.

Traps are gay, and so am I for liking them.

traps are not gay... women with penises are not automatically men

It's not gay if the penis is feminine and the balls don't touch.