Redoes roadmap because they aren't meeting deadlines

>Redoes roadmap because they aren't meeting deadlines
>Only supports ETH for transactions
>Thinks it will be able to implement fiat end of Q2
>Weekly updates have less and less substance

I think the REQ team is slowly realizing it is fucked.

Attached: 1_B42s7aE8Qgluk1EyBcCDlw.png (750x750, 29K)

my req stays high tech while I get erect $100 eoy

But my Reqt is lowtech and does not eReqt.
28¢ eo2518

Man, you guys are really running thin with the FUD.

Actually they will do all that and more.

Still doesn't matter though because whales will make sure REQ will stay nicely at $0.29 until late 2020

Attached: Hrl7L9e[1].png (773x773, 165K)

Nice FUD.

lolol... the fact that there is zero legitimate fud on this token makes me feel so fucking comfy. I honestly believe REQ will 300x.

DELUDED
E
L
U
D
E
D

Sound like a TRX or XVG holder, they also think there is nothing bad about their coin.

>Q3 2020
>REQ handles 10% of global e-commerce, daily volume equal to the GDP of China
>29 cents...

Attached: DEC05_1148_REQBTC.jpg (1280x800, 393K)

>Back handed way of saying there are bad things about REQ without actually being able to say what is bad about it.
Please, enlighten me. I've worked in investment banking for the last 26 years of my life and have worked at 2 of the largest VC firms. All I do all day is research companies. EVERY crypto project is highly speculative because crypto needs actual adoption for any of them to succeed long term, but of them all, REQ is a top 10 project without any doubts, and of them all, REQ is one of very few which is already seeing real world use and adoption. The action now is very similar to BTC and ETH in early days, and frankly REQ has a much stronger use case than either of those. Companies don't care about having "new" money, they care about having more of the existing money. REQ allows that to happen.

Which brings it back to my original point, REQ can't do what it promises and now the updates will keep getting pushed back due to "Unforeseen hurdles". If you think REQ is valuable just due to what it promises, then why aren't you all in on Cardano or EOS?

REQ is dead. They were trying to solve a problem that didnt exist.

garbage thread

Attached: 988.jpg (1020x1020, 744K)

What's your opinion on FUN?

No FUD needed. REQ has literally no purpose.

Get em tiger

Garbage namefag

Hey you fuck off that’s an officer you’re mouthing off too

what rank are you fagtron

If you pay attention, Req is gearing up for fiat gateways. Their ERC20 mainnet will have DAI and DGX stable coins. ING just released news they are working on blockchain. Put two and two together--Req will be using DAI and DGX for fiat-crypto and fiat to fiat, and ING bank will come back into the fray. If I were about to make this happen, I would also keep it secret from the rest of the crypto world. Notice that they suddenly went mum about fiat? Either they are failing miserably (doubt it) or they are about to drop the mic.

>Either they are failing miserably (doubt it)

Seems more likely, tbph.

ING stopped dealing with them months ago because of not wanting to get fucked by regulations.

guys i tried daytrading this shit for the FIRST time and lost some of my stack

just buy'nhold

I work at ING. No official partnership but there still are meetings / video conferences.

SHOULDA BOUGHT LINK INSTEAD, HAHA!

Here you go boys !

Attached: 1522334993131.png (496x409, 34K)

the only coin im up on

Attached: flat,800x800,070,f.u1.jpg (800x673, 103K)