Were Greeks KARA BOGA all this time?

Well Achilles had blond hair, it is written, so why not blue eyes too.

Attached: Dennis-Hopper-Clifford-Worley-True-Romance-150x150[1].jpg (150x150, 7K)

This is a South African production funded by the BBC. Who has been shilling South African film recently

Ancient Greeks and Italians were Nordic in appearence.

Those are pretty fitting castings twitter.com/AncientEurope/status/985961899803148293

>bringing facts into the thread

Attached: nordic wizard.png (493x395, 142K)

Not really, the greek word for blond corresponds to dirty blond by your standards. Certainly not platinum lmao.

There's 0 reason for a nordnegro to be playing achilles, the italian is right as usual.

yes, ancient greeks were black

Attached: Memnon,_favorite_of_Herodes_Atticus_-_Altes_Museum_-_Berlin_-_Germany_2017_(2).jpg (600x1067, 124K)

Attached: eda76cd215629bfcb82949bb629da4fb4b1aa461b9723129e94c2a8767d1373d.png (819x686, 1.1M)

Greeks have always been black.

Memnon was black, but that's just because his mum made him black and his mum was a goddess and can make her child any color she wants.

His mom probably wanted some incestuous bbc

checking black on the census thing if I ever move to murrica
gonna get some of that affirmative action boiiii

> Trojan, i.e. Turkish
This is the worst use of "i.e." I have seen.

>Paris (the Trojan i.e Turkish prince)
G O D

looks arab

Trojans were TURKS

Nevermind that Turks were on the opposite side of Asia back then.

Greeks were turks originally so yes

>1 The outward appearance of Alexander is best represented by the statues of him which Lysippus made, and it was by this artist alone that Alexander himself thought it fit that he should be modelled. 2 For those peculiarities which many of his successors and friends afterwards tried to imitate, namely, the poise of the neck, which was bent slightly to the left, and the melting glance of his eyes, this artist has accurately observed. 3 Apelles, however, in painting him as wielder of the thunder-bolt, did not reproduce his complexion, but made it too dark and swarthy. Whereas he was of a fair colour, as they say, and his fairness passed into ruddiness on his breast particularly, and in his face. 4 Moreover, that a very pleasant odour exhaled from his skin and that there was a fragrance about his mouth and all his flesh, so that his garments were filled with it, this we have read in the Memoirs of Aristoxenus.[160]
>[T]he strong, handsome commander with one eye dark as the night and one blue as the sky
>Physically, Alexander was not prepossessing. Even by Macedonian standards he was very short, though stocky and tough. His beard was scanty, and he stood out against his hirsute Macedonian barons by going clean-shaven. His neck was in some way twisted, so that he appeared to be gazing upward at an angle. His eyes (one blue, one brown) revealed a dewy, feminine quality. He had a high complexion and a harsh voice.[164]
Even alexander the great had a blue eye

Wow didn't know Alexander the great was double eye coloured or whatever it's called

So... black then?

I-idris elba ?

He wasn't, that's some faggotoid historian LARP

>sources from his era
Why would you argue with facts?

>this guy made it too dark and swarthy therefore it's invalid

Who is the historian exactly to determine this? What a retard, most classic case of cherry-picking I have seen and you're a damn moron.

Are you talking about the alexander mosaic from a private residence in pompeii? That's not very convincing, why do you disagree with multiple historians? Genuinely curious if you would have some sources that blow them the fuck out.

Have you actually read their sources? Try reading them, they're dubious and fictitious, something which was common at the time.

Post some alternative sources then. If you are going with a mosaic from pompeii dated around 100 bc you don't have much of a case. Especially when earlier depictions would imply otherwise. Stop being mad and try to make a valid case.

Alexander the Great was born more than a thousand fucking years later in the northernmost part of Greece, after 3 or 4 great migrations from who knows where turned the whole region upside down, and Athenians barely even considered his region "Greece", Macedonians were seen as half barbarians. Not to mention this other genius mentioning a person born 2000 years later in a different fucking area.
By the way, all these people arguing the Greeks were blue eyed blond aryans are (((coincidentally))) all nordics.
Plus paleness was a sign of nobility (no tan from manual labor), and a historian calling him dark would be like a historian calling him "a fat fuck". And if you do know how "historians" worked back then, and the ratio of integrity to made up stuff, to ass kissing, you'd know how much sources are worth.

But again, we shouldn't be arguing about Alexander who ethnically has very little to do with the Myceneans.

...

I'm not arguing that greeks were mostly blue eyed blondes, that's a ridiculous claim. That still doesn't mean that those traits didn't exist there at the time so his depictions are entirely plausible. Would you really argue otherwise?

Paleness wasn't a sign of nobility for men, it was a sign of femininity. Alexander was a conqueror who fought in a lot of battles, he had no shielding from the sun.

>t. Semir Osmangulu

I honestly believe all that SJW nonsense in the Western world is caused by a too high living standard. People care too much about microagression, feminism and putting blacks everywhere when the price of bread, meat and gasoline becomes irrelevant to the average man. Who cares about all this shit, as we say, it won't make bread cheaper.

Menelaus was described as having red hair in the Illiad you mong.

>Paris (the Trojan, i.e. Turkish prince)

Attached: a1a.jpg (400x240, 147K)

ITT: nord*ids trying to appropriate southron culture

Attached: Greek BVLL vs soyboy nord.webm (1280x720, 2.84M)

Everyone knows Ancient Greeks and Romans were blonde/red and brown haired. The Southrons of today are Moorish and Turkish rape babies with jet black hair and swarthy skin denoting their arab heritage. Not even exaggerating that's what hundreds of years of shitskin rape does to a country. It makes them hairy, manlets and love cologne and hair gel and corrupt.

>And thats what Homer would have wanted
>the Trojan, .e. Turkish, prince

This is an onion article

Um no sweetie. You can't appropriate something that wasn't there from the start. None of the modern med countries have any cultural similarities with cultures from antiquity. They probably have more in common with China, sweetie. You're talking about cunts whose national identity rose in the past few centuries.