Why does he hate us so much bros?

Why does he hate us so much bros?

Attached: Screenshot_20180717-214452.jpg (1440x1643, 540K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Coal_and_Steel_Community
bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44423072
wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-pitches-tariff-free-trade-zone-to-g-7-allies-1528556581
cnbc.com/2018/06/09/trump-says-at-g-7-summit-trade-should-be-tariff-free-barrier-free-subsidy-free.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

He doesn't like African countries

because, you see

media says he must hate Russia

Russia is in Europe

but he doesn't want to hate Russia

so he hates the EU instead

both are in Europe

Trump on Twitter: Fuck rocket man.
Trump IRL face to face with Kim: He's a brilliant young man.
Trump on Twitter: Fuck Slatin 2.0.
Trump IRL face to face with Putin: BFF
Trump on Twitter: Fuck China.
Trump IRL face to face with xinpinpong: Yes, fuck me in the ass my yellow overlord.

Seriously, this guy is the classic autistic kid that love to sperg out online but doesn't have the balls the say those things in front of others. And he loves to talk shit about his allies.

>shit on allies
>sucks the dick of his enemies
ayy gr8 president m8 xd

I mean why would putin lie?

Attached: F4F78DCF-107C-486A-83AD-38E99FC7391B.jpg (750x885, 468K)

>Trump weakening America's influence on the world

I fucking love this guy.

Attached: come on lets get big.gif (300x169, 1.47M)

>Why does he hate us so much bros?
He don't want to be know as the president that made his country lost the tittle of super power.

The EU should just kick every m*ttoid out of the Union in retaliation

Lol.

Attached: CB6D89A9-8BD0-4538-A929-DBA3EC00FEB3.jpg (750x877, 533K)

>allies
fucking no one contributes to nato spending
they're nothing but a liability

They hate us cuz they ain't us

>why wont our satraps fund our empire???
i actually hate americans so much lmao

>Undemocratic nepotism is supposed to be the friend of the United States
Maybe Trump is trying to make up for the Cold War by saying what needs to be said? The EU a shit , Corbyn is right

go cry in a corner irrelevant

>I think the EU is a foe...

"IN TRADE"

The fake news media leaves out 2 words and the world freaks the fuck out.

>NATO is our empire
It's literally what prevents Europe from being invaded by Russia and acts as regional hegemony that prevents Eurofags from killing each other in massive wars like they love doing

Did he not mean in a trading competitor sense? Which is true, just as how France is a trade competitor of Germany within the EU.

Because the EU impoverishes smaller nation states in the name of french and german oligarchies

Attached: 1531857636565.jpg (1080x1349, 158K)

But you're not spending any tax money on them you know? They're not a liability and NATO still has too much power, Russia spending doesn't come close to it. Stop eating media retard

Yes, they left out 2 words (in trade) to make a sensationalized headline and tards don't read the entire article

every other country is a foe when it comes to trade, makes sense

Those that have a different economic paradigm should become a foe, those that share the same economic principles should be allied

>as regional hegemony that prevents Eurofags from killing each other
Simply untrue
That's the EU

yeah, but every country needs to put themselves first and not give away too much if they can

putting themselves first doesn't necessarily mean putting tariffs, if anything free trade is always beneficial if the countries share the same economic principles. The problem nowadays is that free trade basically is unifying tons of different countries and economies disregarding their population needs and culture and that solely benefits oligarchies and multinationals behind those countries, while screwing the market for the common man even more

It's stupid, it's bullshit like this that ruins the media's reputation. Have these retards never read "the boy who cried wolf"?

Well yeah, since governments have become so involved in their national economy and keeping their citizens employed. For example, if India announces they want to buy military jets, you will have France, Sweden, Germany, Russia, America and China all competing against eachother for the contracts which would mean more more and employment for their citizens.

>The problem nowadays is that free trade basically is unifying tons of different countries and economies disregarding their population needs and culture and that solely benefits oligarchies and multinationals behind those countries, while screwing the market for the common man even more
Extreme poverty is decreasing everywhere, and the common man can buy way cheaper goods thanks to globalization

>buy cheaper goods
with an ever decreasing salary and their kids being perverted by mass media and human rights making crime more prevalent, wow quality of life is sure increasing, i mean now I can buy an iphone X and make some selfies!

>and not give away too much if they can

America had literally everything going for it in terms of looking in the future. Amazon, Facebook, Google, Apple, Microsoft, Ebay, Yahoo, Paypal, Tesla and many more megacorps that were set to dominate key industries in a global economy. America has been dominating the shit out of the global market in terms of services, which is the hallmark of an advanced economy. Trump is putting these companies under the guillotine in favor of a nigger tier production economy because now that he's fucking the countries where his own companies were selling to, in the ass, there is nowhere they can expand, but inward.

What if after another round of tarriffs EU, Japan and India go full China on these companies and tell Americans to fuck off entirely, ripping apart their global market? Will Drumpfy threaten to drop a nuke in the middle of Europe as his companies that actually matter falter? He's playing a retarded game with his country.

Honestly, I would be weary of reading too much on what the media reports. I feel like every week there is a new article on how stupid, insipid & weak The President is. I sometimes wonder how the media would have treated Hilary if she ended up winning instead. Would it be this negative, day after day of hate.

>Fox News reporter of all people goes hard on Putin asking him about Crimea and disappeared reporters, it's awkward and tense
>commenters call him a clinton/cnn shill and praise putin

where were you when we entered the timeline where southern redneck american nationalists and russian nationalists joined forces? how did we come to this?

This. Bush junior looked in his eyes and saw his deep Russian soul. Man of such quality would not besmirch his honor by saying untruths.

I didn't think it would happen but I will live to see America dying and us aligning closer to Russia and China. It will be a great day when that finally happens.

What do you mean, "no one"
:c

>What if after another round of tarriffs EU, Japan and India go full China on these companies and tell Americans to fuck off entirely, ripping apart their global market?

This would be smart but also require balls that these countries don't have. The tariff situation and Trump has finally given them an excuse for this though.

Spending less than the 2% goal =/= not contributing.

European NATO members have also sent troops to Iraq and Afghanistan because of Americas bullshit wars that weren't even well justified. Americans can't even thank us for doing that shady shit on their behalf. In the meantime, America hasn't fought a war on our behalf since WW2. They just station their troops in peace time Europe, enjoy our excellent training facilities and complain about how much work they do for us.

>EU
>Military
HahahahaHAHAHAHAHA

balkans? forgot that already?

It will definitely come to this eventually if Trump continues on this path, which he will. Having all these American service companies here making pure profit and taking it back to America doesn't make sense in Trump's world.

Well, Taxify already exists, let's tell Uber to fuck off first. There's a foe for you.

It isn't military power that is preventing inter-EU wars
Simply put, our infrastructure is too interconnected to even think of a war. For example, if Italy were to attack France, it couldn't bomb any power plants (because they provide energy to Italy too)

All Brexit problems would be solved if the EU were destroyed.

Attached: EUSSR btfo.jpg (1280x720, 271K)

>You see because of globalization people won't engage in wars

Oh yeah because reliance on US oil sure stopped the Japanese from bombing Pearl Harbor now didn't it?

What NATO country did you defend in the balkans?

OBSSESED

Trump sees the EU customs market as a protectionist racket that acts in a mercantile fashion, not just with tariffs, but especially with non-tariff-barriers to trade. He offered a mutual zero-tariff deal to the Europeans, and they awkwardly changed the subject. Then they continued to cry about a trade war caused by the USA. He rightfully sees them as hypocrites.

He sees many European NATO allies as "free-riders". As a bunch of Europeans who care less about Europe's defense than the USA cares about Europe's defense. Germany's military is in shambles, and they are building a pipeline to ship cash to Russia. Then they tell us, "how dare you not defend us from Russia!" Then Trump tells them, build up your military, don't only buy gas from Russia; they respond that he is somehow acting in Russia's interest by saying this.

He's wrong to use the word "foe". Europeans sometimes behave like parasites, but they are not our enemy. They are our partners, but they have shifted too much of the burden of defending Europe onto us. Trump is also wrong to be so warm towards Putin, who truly is a "Foe".

Attached: main_battle_tanks.jpg (960x783, 118K)

Trump has been treated very unfairly by the FAILING NYT. Sad!

Japan and the US were two hegemonic empires fighting for the control of the sea
A war in the EU is not only unthinkable, but simply impossible. You can't even acquire the materials for a war en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Coal_and_Steel_Community

>Trump sees the EU customs market as a protectionist racket that acts in a mercantile fashion, not just with tariffs, but especially with non-tariff-barriers to trade. He offered a mutual zero-tariff deal to the Europeans, and they awkwardly changed the subject. Then they continued to cry about a trade war caused by the USA. He rightfully sees them as hypocrites.
Why did the EU just sign the biggest free trade deal ever signed with Japan just today? Considering that Japan competes with key EU industries like automakers and electronics already

You people are fucking subhuman. Jesus.

If Russia hates something, so will Trump

The ones that didn't want shitty Balkan terrorism spreading into their nations? We got involved on behalf of the EU and the UN to attempt to provide regional stability so violence didn't spread beyond the balkans

>The_Great_Illusion_by_Norman_Angell_(1910).txt
>"...the economic cost of war was so great that no one could possibly hope to gain by starting a war the consequences of which would be so disastrous."[3] For that reason, a general European war was very unlikely to start, and if it did, it would not last long.

>He offered a mutual zero-tariff deal to the Europeans, and they awkwardly changed the subject.

Lol, this is an outrageous lie. He personally suspended the free trade talks with the EU. During the G7 summit he agreed to a free trade agreement once more but when his staff told him that this would mean abolishing subsidies for American industries he had an autistic fit, rescinded his signature from the agreement and called Trudeau a back stabber. What an absolute retard.

>Japan and the US were two hegemonic empires fighting for the control of the sea
Lol no the Japanese did not fight the war for economic purposes, that what the failure of these globalized policies fail to understand - the human factor in war can't be simplified into being caused by purely economic stressors, and while eliminating these economic tensions might relieve pressure into war it's not to eliminate it completely.

What is centralized can be decentralized, what is controlled by a beneficial economic organization can change due to factors outside of the economic.

Economic reliance on neighboring nations does not prevent war, it's not something that can be controlled so easily

>He offered a mutual zero-tariff deal to the Europeans, and they awkwardly changed the subject.
Source?
The US and the EU were actually negotiating a FTA that would have removed all tariffs and trade barriers (TTIP) but Trump canceled it as soon as he got into office.
That would make no sense at all if he actually wanted a free trade agreement with the EU.

i dont think he hates the USA

>Why did the EU just sign the biggest free trade deal ever signed with Japan just today? Considering that Japan competes with key EU industries like automakers and electronics already

Because Japan like most of the EU is an export-driven economy and every exporting economies number 1 foreign policy objective is to make the flow of goods as free as possible.

yeah he does. like the rest of his voters. which is why they're so comfortable to suck russian cock

because you steal our jobs, france.

you got us entangled in the suez crisis, you got us entangled in vietnam. You keep inviting in moslems to blow you up, shoot, you, and run you over. You act like a haughty little bitch when it comes to NATO, and you wonder why we hate you, France?

You're shit.

kys you stupid mutt the us only defend(ed) the muslim terrorists in the region

He doesn't want free trade this would assume the belief of some faint notion of meritocratic competition. Trump doesn't believe in this, he's a bully. Trade that involves industries propped up by government subsidies isn't free.

Yeah because we didn't care about the region we just wanted to contain your autism in one place , the best way to do so was to defend the weaker factions until the situation fizzled out

You seething brainlet Japan bombed pearl harbor because the US embargoed them

Trump is not in favor of free markets , he's both protectionistic and isolationist. He's the antithesis of what conservativism in the United States has been since Ronald Reagan

>Lol no the Japanese did not fight the war for economic purposes
They literally did. They invaded China and the european colonies in the Far East to obtain resources(they tried to sell that as an war of “asiatic liberation”, which fooled no one), and attacked the USA because they hoped that they would back down and lift the oil embargo that they put on the japs as a reaction tp said invasions.

if everybody would have just listened to obama TTIP AND TPP would be in effect today. we'd be untouchable against china

...thus proving that economic incentives were not enough to prevent war. You realize that the embargo was enacted in order to force the Japanese to stop being so aggresive in the Pacific, right?

Because the US though that the Japanese wouldn't dare to invade a nation they were so reliant on... Hmmm.... But tnst wasn't the case

>We're gonna lock 'em up folks, we're gonna drain the swamp, the EU, folks, they're bad hombres, they're killin' us folks, we're not gonna take it, thank you and God bless

Attached: 1506274759854.png (394x379, 10K)

I thought we were supposed to be a "protection racket" according to the Americans

>"we're gonna drain the swamp"
>appoint officials so outlandishly corrupt that it's like they're out of a satire

i'm gonna use my position as head of the EPA to get a discount on trump hotel mattresses

The US did nothing but took one sided approach and simply put the problems under the carpet ensuring that the permanent instability covered by some half-baked "solutions" would justify the military presence here. You are nothing but parroting stupid cnn propaganda shit. Hopefully the Chinese will finally put you stupid fucks in place.

The Japanese fought the war out of ideological purposes involving their worship of their emperor combined with the extreme industrialization that occured after the Meiji Era.

They invaded Pearl Harbor to cripple through US, and foe nothing else. I mean not even a day after Pearl Harbor they invaded through Phillipines my dude, there was no political narrative of trying to coerce the US into being more neutral the Japanese just wanted war

>attempt to leave Syria while also still taking shits on Assad on the way out
>arm and assist Ukrainian, sometimes literal fascist Ukrainian, militants in *killing* Russians
He's a Moscow puppet!

>request that allies meet the minimum 2% GDP defense budget allocation that NATO calls for
He's dismantling NATO!

>put tariffs on economic unions that already have higher tariffs on us
He wants a trade war!

You retards, America is simply taking a step homeward towards the America First platform he ran on. It's almost like the Neoliberal establishment in the West hates this and wants to paint the relaxing of bring World Police that y'all always wanted as a treasonous act.

praise kek my dude

china becoming the dominant world police superpower would end up like a dystopian sci-fi nightmare

i know everyone throws black mirror around willy nilly but it'd literally be black mirror
>social credit system encourages not hanging out with problematic people if you want freedom of movement
>internet censored to hell and back
>black bag you if you compare their president to winnie the pooh

Everbody outside the EU hates it. The EU is a German construct built to control Europe. It consists of unelected bureaucrats who create senseless rules.

Above-all, the EU believes it is a world power, on a par with Japan, the States, or Switzerland. The EU very much is a non entity, governed by a drunken dotard and it - together with its shitty euro meme currency - will fall apart within the next couple of years.

Nobody takes the EU serious, nobody. Trust me, fais-moi confiance, François.

Attached: drinking.jpg (634x423, 52K)

>Implying I wanted to back the Muslims
Kebab deserves to be removed desu, the legacy of the Ottomans deserves to be dismantled.

The US didn't care for anything but their obligations to what the UN and EU wanted as per NATO involvement in bosnia. It was nothing but a business transaction, the USA wasn't really trying to save lives although maybe soldiers involved in the fighting wanted to think so while they never questioned orders

fuck europe

Attached: tariffs.jpg (1127x899, 90K)

>appoint officials so outlandishly corrupt that it's like they're out of a satire
But none of that is true though, there was one man who turned out to have shady deals in Ukraine but most of Trump's cabinet and overall administration is fine.

What level of shitpost are we on?

>They invaded Pearl Harbor to cripple through US
Yes, because the thought that the USA was a weak, effeminate democracy that would back down if the public perceived the war as costly, and thus lift the oil embargo. It was something that was openly stated both in the japanese own internal memos and in postwar interviews with major japanese military leaders.

Just remember, a communist head of a single-party dystopia gets crickets in a visit to London, but DRUMPF visiting gets pic related

Attached: 1531665538520.jpg (800x600, 543K)

>Peaceful, successful nations striving to work together for the betterment of all mankind

YEAH KILL'EM

Attached: 1504958469486.png (1515x775, 795K)

that literally did happen
bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44423072
wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-pitches-tariff-free-trade-zone-to-g-7-allies-1528556581
cnbc.com/2018/06/09/trump-says-at-g-7-summit-trade-should-be-tariff-free-barrier-free-subsidy-free.html
take your pick on your source

Attached: screenshot-www.businessinsider.com-2018-07-17-18-27-34.png (1219x2943, 1.23M)

New Mexico Terr. is wrong, should be split horizontally with the Arizona Terr. to the south.
Arizona Terr. was CSA aligned, New Mexico was USA aligned

fuck off lmao

of course there's more anger at chinas greatest competitor and foe suddenly sucking fascist dick whenever they're face to face and publically admiring the north korean people's """loyalty""" than china continuing to be the same shitty dystopians they've been since mao

trying to invalidate protests because people they don't protest EVERYTHING BAD EVER is a bullshit distraction and you're well aware of it

Like I already said, they agreed to move towards that in the declaration at the g7 summit but then his personal aides rushed to explain to him that this meant abolishing subsidies for American. industries. He's a fucking moron.

europe basically sees us as a threat but are arrogant enough to think they can handle competition from other cunts in free trade deals

It's not a big deal when your dog shits in the back garden, it's when he shits on the kitchen table you have a problem mate.

But the entire point I was making is that war can't be simplified to purely economic causes, and that is clearly and ideological motivator rather than economic because regardless of Pearl Harbor the Japanese invaded The Phillipines held by the United States 12 or so hours after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. They wanted war, they just expected the US to be too passive to do anything about the inevitable conflict

Hating the EU does not mean you hate EU countries

>UK still in their
>Literally voted to leave in 2016
>"You can just leave bro, it's so easy lol"

Attached: 4a4.gif (444x444, 2.56M)

>it's not like an armada of russian shitposter filled the web with racist shit to the point that people become braindead retards and start praising kek and support trump all over internet

>Their
*There inb4 some autist corrects me

Come on m8 gotta do better than "no u"

>sucking fascist dick
wut

Only fascists we deal with are certain Ukrainians, of course we also support YPG communists too.
Unless you mean the DPRK, in which case I laugh at the prospect of trying to shift blame away from Marxism's Juche by calling them fascist.
This "sucking dick" was getting the DPRK to denuclearize.

If you pretend that goofy protest was anything nuanced, you're foolish. It's because the MSM works hand in hand with the establishment to get plebs riled up over non-issues while international business plays us like a fiddle.

>A priori logic
Disgusting

that isnt even close to what happened.
>"No tariffs, no barriers, that's the way it should be — and no subsidies," the president said at a press conference.
he specifically asked for ending subsidies and only refused to back the G7 message after it was clear that they were not interested in doing such a thing and intead were for dropping lots of tariffs but keeping in place protective subsidies such as those that most European countries put on products such as cheese.
At least read an article it makes it quite clear what happened