Chainlink will fail. How can it compete when iota is using Qubit a decentralized network provider for distributed oracles. Iota is feeless. Ether is not.
It doesn't matter that chainlink can work on multiple blockchains if every blockchain uses a seperate provider. What evidence is there that we need 20 different blockchains anyway? People investing in chainlink are unironically deluded.
Other urls found in this thread:
pingas
Does Iota solve the oracle problem?
Also what's with Rory being cryptic about if chainlink had anything to do with Iota? Qubit has nothing to do with chainlink in case anyone cares.
Qubit solves the oracle problem for iota whicb is feeless. Chainlink will fail because of economics.
Chainlink cube logo is all over the iota video. Iota needs link.
From the iota discord
Qubit is unrelated to chainlink and iota no longer needs chainlink as they are using Qubit.
I'm twice as happy being in ChainLink knowing that smug IOTA fanboys who didn't even talk about oracles before yesterday are going to be proved wrong.
>Qubit solves the oracle problem
How?
You should be able to prove the claim you're so boldly making, no?
Qubit is providing a network of decentralized oracles for iota. You need a network of decentraluzed oracles to solve the oracle problem. Are you new?
Great answer... so you don't know how, what, and why, but you see fit to shitpost to your heart's content.
Dunning kruger in full effect here.
From: pajeet
By: pajeet city coin
Why am I not surprised
>fee-less
Keynsians go and stay go
Even if they did roll out decentralized oracles you'd be stuck using their blockchain (they won't). Most likely they are getting centralised shit oracles like everyone else unless hard evidence proves otherwise
I went to do my due diligence and see how the Qubic oracle would stack up to Chainlink.
It's literally just a hype video. I'm not even fucking kidding. lmfao
You obviously can't connect the dots that ive provided
The only thing you've provided is a very long shitstain on the ground
the day that chainlink died.
Rest in peace
is this the single worst piece of music ever created?
>cryptic
you are literally retarded
>IOTA is better than Ethereum
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
OH NONONONONO
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH
Unironically, IOTA and VEN just marketed oracles with their products and essentially validated the usecase in this space. Im now convinced Link will moon but it might take some time.
you're already paying for bandwidth you faggot. why pay for a transaction too? how much did you pay Jow Forums for that post? the absolute state of biz
t. weighs a ton
The funniest part is seeing all the IOTA retards go "Oh yeah, oracle, yeah, how exciting" like they aren't capable of getting excited about something until it's been put in a "high tech" animated hype advertisement. Fucking cretins lmao
my virgin big brain enjoys this as well
t. 11k linklet
I agree on the use case being expanded, but disagree on link’s moon. I think this will bring it forward; VEN and IOTA will unironically set the bar very low on oracles, and Link will look amazing by comparison
there already are many different blockchains and they're not going away to all join iota.
>posts "CHAINLINK WILL FALL, QUBIT CAN DO ORACLES, ALSO ECONOMICS SIRS"
>You obviously can't connect the dots that ive provided
the absolute status of this Macedonian chicken breeding forum. sage and kys
Or maybe people were already interested, but it actually being added to a viable crypto platform that has corporate partnerships out the ass is exciting.
>where were you the day chainlink died
This is now an Ambrosus shill thread. Iota and link are garbage
Literally this. Why can’t you brainlets stop lumping “muh oracles” into the same fucking pool. Do you even know what a fucking oracle is? Aside from that, do you have any specific information as to what data the iota oracles will provide to *iota specific* smart contracts (oh, guess that detail didn’t register). We don’t know, but it looks like from the video it’s a pretty narrow spectrum... market data and what not. Once again, just for iota. It would take too long to explain why you’re comparisons are so small minded since you all are fucking retarded and don’t even know what you’re investing in/FUDing.
Reasons why Ambrosus is better than link or iota
1. Best memes
2. Chad ceo
3. Mooning unlike your shitcoins
4. Masternode income for life
why does nobody on biz understand what 'unironically' means. you're seriously all retarded down syndrome faggots
who cares?
Link is the Trojan for autistic fucks
Iota is for rebellious teenagers who think they can upset btc dominance.
Ambrosus is for MANLY MEN
This is half decent FUD, but you need to develop it more
lmao who the fuk is that nigga
Hahahha holy fuck you are cringe.
"I can't explain what I'm talking about because I don't even know how chainlink addresses the oracle problem, or understand how this differs from how iota tries to approach the problem, but if I just claim that you can't connect the dots and you won't notice what a retard I am."
See? If you were being honest you would have just typed that, but now you just look like a braindead faggot. Rip.
Ye let's just add inflation instead that makes sense
Neck urself
How much do you get paid?
honest question.
I mean you realize everyone knows you're full of shit, and you guys are posting this bullshit all day.
How much do you get paid to do it?
inflation works if the commodity is in demand. neck your mother then yourself. nigger
every time I consider buying AMB I see you faggots stinking up every biz thread with your shitty generic paid shilling and I immediately change my mind. seriously, fatsetti, you're doing more harm than good I promise you