"We’re currently working with multiple smart contract development teams on their use of ChainLink as both a way to add external data to their own contracts, and/or for use by contracts generated on their own platform."
Right here shows that they are not onlhy working with companies but also other blockchains. I suspect Hyperledger, Chain, R3, etc. Yes some of those have an oracle solution to bring data in but are not able to communicate across blockchains or able to prove a decentralized approach to the external data.) I suspect Hyperledger will be the larger one as many companies have been testing it and its is part of the linux foundation (open source like chainlink) and IC3.
"We’re also working with larger technical teams applying smart contracts to an existing company’s back-end, as well as the teams building smart contracts in private networks."
SmartContract as a company is actually creating smart contract solutions for large corporations. Every one of these corporations are going to be nudged to use chainlink. Another reference to private networks, I am thinking these are companies that are using chain, quorum, and similar private and semi-private chains. The truth is many of the big corps don't want full transparency on a public blockchain and will go with a private chain. Either way Chainlink is positioned to get business from both uses.
"As a result of our ongoing work with agile smart contract development teams, payment networks, banks, and financial institutions, we’re making ChainLink useful for technical teams of all sizes."
Literally says right here they are workign with payment networks, banks, and financial institutions. Unless Sergey is a liar, here is proof Chainlink will be used by the above.
"We’re currently working with multiple data providers, payment networks, and various API services, which we are actively enabling to be these key building blocks for the next highly successful smart contract. "
This is stale? I've read this before lol why posting now
Cameron Fisher
its funny because chainchink being below 1$ actually defeats the purpose XD if the network is used by businesses as projected then there will be such a high minimum volume of value being put through the network at any given time that even if all the LINK was locked up as collateral for contracts, it would NEED to be over $1 per LINK to even facilitate a single billion dollars of volume at that given moment in time. One single billion would be nothing lelelelellelel
we know for a fact they are not working with the actual hyperledger team, at least as of this blog post and then in December 2017, because in the hyperledger emails they didn't really even understand chainlink nor it's use of towncrier.
Xavier Rodriguez
>blog post from December >talking about it in fucking MAY as if it's news The absolute state of stinky linkys No one is buying your shit token
Connor Campbell
Wew erc677 .
Wew ropsten is erc20, my links are erc20
Wew thanks for being useless in my question
Daniel Jackson
Transfer and call
Dylan Brown
shhhhh, let them have hope. biz needs a meme coin to shit on
A bank needs Swift to transfer 1 USD to rmb. They send a message code, the code goes and gets information from an oracle provider on hyperledger. The oracle provider contacts 10 nodes through APIs that are connected to various “official USD TO RMB” banks. Each node requests 1 chainlink token. But hyperledger use some tokens? This is where’s I’m confused
