TOP KEK AT ANYONE STILL HOLDING THIS AND MISSING OUT ON GAINS

i like it, pajeets on Jow Forums are getting desperate and angry and will sell soon or already sold, REQ is gonna break ATH in the next 3-6 months, but these people have to be already out chasing flavor of the month

184k REQ holder here, I am a patient man.

Please, keep rejecting it until pressure makes it break through or you run out of money.

This. The sentiment is turning to despair for REQ even though it's up 100% since the bear market ended. People are getting angry, long term holders probably selling, even when nothing but good developments come out for this every week.

Pajeets jumping from coin to coin are going to chase a pump, see REQ moon, then post a thread with a pink wojack saying he got bogged because as soon as he sold it started going up.

Hint: You aren't getting bogged, you're an impatient fuck.

>100 a piece
>with a total supply of 1 bil

hahaha

You can't deny REQ has been a shit performer relative to the rest of the market my dude, there has been an opportunity cost and a large one at that. If you held EOS for the last 2 months and re-bought into REQ you would have more than doubled your stack. It has been a very poor performer although I don't doubt it will have its day. If it doesn't happen soon then holding REQ these last few months will have turned out to be an objectively bad situation, mind you there was/is 0 way to predict it, it has some of the best fundamentals of any project on the market and the tokenomics are such that it will maximise the value of the token with increased network usage.

It could get up to 100 with token burn

The entire point of suppressing the price right now below $0.30 for years is so that the supply drops quicker. Why do you think our whale group would suppress it otherwise? It's to get a bigger return on investment in the long run.

So the $100 will not be for a total supply of 1 billion but between 250 million and 500 million.

You realize that the exact opposite could have happened, with EOS being stagnant but REQ mooning, right?

You're a retard that uses hindsight to tell everyone what they should have done like it was obvious without the hindsight.

Can you not read?
> holding REQ these last few months will have turned out to be an objectively bad situation, mind you there was/is 0 way to predict it
A bad situation, not a bad decision. But you're acting as if you're happy REQ has been a poor performer which is really stupid.

Man I got in at $0.06 back in the day and while I'm not bothered since I have made gains, the people who bought over 50 cents must be pissed. There's just no volume. Nobody is buying. Zero interest. Should have sold at $1 but got greedy. Could have made sweet gains and still keep the same stack I have now.

Serious question, why are you confident you'll be able to suppress it for years, and not months? I assume your group stays up to date on every bit of news that comes out for it to adjust your plan accordingly.

They're going to Consensus 2018 to speak to as many people in the industry as possible to market themselves. They've also got the Bitcoin oracle and the start of ERC20 support before the end of this month.

Also, even though the price remains under 30 cents, the total # of holders on etherscan has continued to go up.

The total # of holders on etherscan has continued to go up for the past 4 months. People aren't interested in trading REQ, but there is growing interest for people to buy and just hold it as part of their folio.

This is--not memeing--what an actual accumulation phase looks like.

It's not real. This would be a completely stupid thing to do and would only lose them money. People got tired of the coin burning fud so they switched to this.

This "we're suppressing price" horseshit is so dumb, you'll eventually run out of weakhands and you'll have to start selling your own coins to the burner bots because no one else will

Attached: 1464477318114.gif (500x240, 1.71M)

Obviously. It's pretty good FUD because anyone that was watching REQ during the bear market saw that 30 cents was a strong support zone for many weeks. This means that 30 cents likewise is the strongest resistance coming out of the bear market.

Clever pajeet sees this, makes it look like this whale group is legit when it keeps failing to go past prior support, and people that weren't in it months ago believe them because 30 cents holds like he foretold, when it's actually just a strong resistance line.

So what I said was wrong?

It's better fud than all the other shit-tier fud for Req, but it's still pretty weak.

The REQ team REALLY needs to start marketing the coin or it will fade away.

Many coins have failed because their teams were a bunch anit-social autists that can't market their projects only cared about coding.

No one is gonna use REQ if they don't know about it.

REQ is a shitcoin and a mess. Can't believe people are still holding this mess and missing out on easy gains while this alt coin season lasts.

We're already selling our own coins. Do you really think we could suppress on weak hands only? Admittedly it's becoming easier the longer we keep the price under $0.30 as people fomo into other projects.

Honestly I'm not going to lie. There is no guarantee that we will be able to suppress the price for 2 years. The 2 year date has been determined by how much of our REQ were expended to keep the price under $0.30 the last couple of weeks. We could keep the current rate of suppression up for the next 2 years. We really only have to dump REQ tokens every partnership announcement and bi-weekly news. Which are usually pretty predictable and so we can budget REQ tokens specifically for those events.

However if there is unexpected dynamic growth in demand we usually just put up sell walls around $0.30 or slightly above it and let buyers buy out of our walls so that the price won't get above $0.30 and cause even more FOMO. Then if there is some slippage above $0.30 we sell into some buy walls to make the price go around $0.29 again.

Most of us actually made some small unintended profit doing this. But it's hard to get new REQ tokens without moving exchanges which is why we are actually trying to contact big REQ holders looking to sell out at a premium. We're offering $0.40 per REQ token if you are willing to sell 1 million and up outside of exchanges if you can provide proof that you bought those tokens during ICO or before March when we began suppressing the price.

What the fuck does marketing look like to you?

- It already has one of the biggest communities in crypto for an alt.

- It continues to announce partnerships both inside crypto and outside of it.

- They produce a lengthy update at least once every two weeks.

- They update the github regularly

- To confirm the partnerships, they have the company they announced it with do a tweet of their own and put out their own announcement

Marketing isn't their issue since they already do more than 90% of other coins that are just hypelords on Twitter. Real-world corps look down on that kind of shit, and REQ's been attracting industry attention without it.

The token doesn't rely on speculators buying it, it relies on their product coming out as soon as possible, getting companies and businesses to use it (which they've been securing), and having people use the services and dapps built on it.

The last thing REQ needs is a paid shill.

WEIRD and CREEPY

top fucking kek if this isnt LARP

the absolute state of the larping in these threads really is reaching stinky linky level.

Enjoy no gains boomer

If REQ even completes half of the goals they intended for this year, and this isn't a larp, you will not be able to suppress shit, lmao.

Nobody is using the REQ platform. Their reddit sub is barely active and no one knows about outside of reddit and Jow Forums. The transaction volume of REQ is laughable at best. REQ will fail in the end.

best larp i've seen in a REQ thread by far, how about some proofs ?

Because it's nothing but a button that can send and receive ETH right now dude. What are you expecting, for the mainnet to come out and suddenly everyone is clamoring to install a 3rd party software on their store to accept ETH when that already exists?

REQ is barely functional right now, the real value comes from its use in accounting, which is why PwC is interested in them, and fiat integration, which is why ING supports them.

Cross-currency payments are also coming after they roll out erc20 support and bitcoin support.

REQS MOONING GUYS

How are they going to solve the fiat problem? I mean, it is way too complex to deal with actual money. They need banks, liquidity. These banks will ask for high fees. And regulation and anti money laundering stuff needs to be part of them. I don't think they will pull that off in Q2 as their original roadmap said. Maybe by the end of the year.

You better hope we're able to. You realize that what we're doing is in the best interest of REQ right? The huge bump in price when we finally stop oppressing the price is going to cause REQ to get on everyone's radar. The entirety of reddit/twitter and facebook will be REQ themed for at least a week. Yeah sure if you're an impatient "investor" only here for the short term then yeah, though luck.

Don't worry we're on it, won't go above $0.30

Definitely not Q2, but can you actually point to anything in the team that would make you think they're incapable of finding a solution, or being smart enough to shift development to other areas if they see that the fiat problem is too difficult for now, so as to not waste time on it?

It's like everyone ignores all the inside marketing they've clearly been doing with a ton of corps. Remember how they stated that they already have 3 organizations that are going to use their crowdfunding dapp once that releases? They're focusing on spreading the seeds needed for real-world adoption, not just speculators and people already in crypto buying their token.

FALSE ALARM
IT ALREADY SOLD OFF

REQ has such a solid team that getting attention now wouldn't matter. It can easily be in the top 10, and having eyes on them would be good because they're a team that actually provides consistent updates, so no, with or without you, it's going to double digits.

>REQS MOONING GUYS
dropping hard again

Attached: vsw.jpg (225x225, 9K)

It wasn't a false alarm. We are just actively suppressing it. Please read up on why and how we're doing this.

t. Merk

Man, you hit me in the feels user.

We got fucking greedy, like the pathetic normies. Instead of taking profit at $1.20, we waited.

Attached: 1386789013002.jpg (400x400, 66K)

Damn if only I could make the 100% most profitable move with every single trade and become a billionaire in a few weeks

Why would anyone do that

>spending the time to write this

It's a big part of our strategy. Show the thread every time it might reach $0.30 that we are actively suppressing it to slowly convince people that we are for real so that they sell their tokens.

It's a win-win for both sides. You guys get to invest in coins that give a bigger short-term profit margin. And we get to keep the price low without having to sell too much of our own supplies. So you're going to keep seeing more of these posts around REQ threads either by me or one of the other members every time REQ comes close to touching $0.30.

It'll give us a higher return on investment in the long run if we keep the token price of REQ low until the burn bot provides most of the buy pressure on exchanges which could take upwards of 1 year to happen. We're stocked up to suppress prices for another 2 years if needed.

This.

The desperate attempt to explain the lack of interested because "muh marketing" is pathetic.

As if an extra blog post will change the general dynamic of the market...

Is it even worth holding like 250 of these?

Hoping to be able to use it for some fun money in the future

Only worth holding if you don't need any major profits until 2021.

Stop giving those faggot larpers the (You) they are so desperate for.

I'll keep on day trading my stack against ETH. I'm not missing the king moon

>two weeks since WooCommerce plug in released
>literally ten tokens burnt

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

NOBODY USES THE PAY WITH REQUEST BUTTON, JUST AS I PREDICTED

"'Y-Y-YEAH, JUST WAIT UNTIL THEY ADD ERC 20 TOKENS DOO DOO HEAD THEN IT WILL MOON"

RETARD, NOBODY WANTS TO PAY WITH KYBER TOKENS

LOOK AT THE LIST OF TOKESN THEIR ADDING SUPPORT FOR, NOBODY EVEN OWNS THOSE TOKESN AND NOBODY WANTS TO PAY IN THOSE TOKESN LMAO

THIS PIECE OF SHIT HAD ITS RUN, ITS FINISHED, IT WILL BE OUT OF TOPP 200 SOON AND DELISTED ON BINANCE LMAO

Attached: REQLMAO.jpg (512x512, 35K)

REQ? More like shit ahahahhahahaha

IM GETTING REAL, REAL CLOSE TO DUMPING BY 100K STACK. IF THIS PUSSY BETA BITCH COIN DOEST BREAK 30CENTS BY SUNDAY NIGHT IM PULLING THE TRIGGER. THERES SUCH LITTLE VOLUME WITH THIS SHITCOIN THAT EVEN MY BABY STACK WILL DUMP THE PRICE TO 20 CENTS. FUCK Y’ALL FOR SHILLING ME THIS PIECE IF SHIT.

>sponsorships

Attached: 1512488110109.jpg (1013x773, 179K)

People who fud this project have to understand the significance of the pricewaterhousecoopers partnership. REQ will be used primarily as an invoicing option between inter-companies with a focus on automated double-entry accounting through blockchain. This is why many people are invested in this project, not the PayPal 2.0 features.

True words of wisdom
Time is on my side. Once I chode my cryptos I will hold them till moon or bust.
t. 30k Req mini whale
>Req 5$ eoy 2018 ( and that's a good thing)

Invoicing doesn’t require fees first off, so that won’t raise the price of the token, and second off to get the block chain accounting features you have to send cryptocurrency. Legitimate businesses don’t send fucking cryptocurrency, lmfao.

hey, TRON is doing great recently, you should definitely look into that one

Nah senpai, I'd much rather listen to anonymous posters who Photoshop shit over the top of a logo than PWC, WooCommerce, wiki etc

it's currency agnostic. fiat is down the road so they won't have to send cryptocurrency. businesses will want to automate these things down the road because human error is just too risky. i know several businesses that would chop their accounting apartment in half if they could have more accurate and automated finances. that leads to lots of req use and lots of token burning.

The world will be a better place when accountants lose their status in the world.
Fuck that profession and fuck lawyers too.

Fiat is not coming soon, it’s an enormously difficult project that requires liquidity providers, tokenizing assets, as well as getting around government regulation. It will likely never come for any project.

It only works with ETH now and ETH isn't a currency. Once other cryptos work then more tokens will burn

Can you please let us know when you're doing it. I'm day trading REQ rn and would like to increase my stack 50%

Correct.

Therefore, the only value of REQ is in its speculation potential.

Now that the product has been delivered and most of the milestones met, there's really nothing to speculate about, and that's why it slipped below the top 200 coins and will be below the top 500 in 2 weeks.

Attached: 1516206785917.jpg (320x320, 14K)

it's at 100

They need to market to Asia. Coins don’t do well when Asian markets aren’t buying.

Dumbass if you were a whale you wouldn’t give away your dumbass secret strategy

it's rumored to be added to coinbit and the company moved their hq to singapore.

I can't tell if REQ fud is ironic or just retarded

This REQ whale FUD is the only one that works because any fundamentals FUD is bullshit.

Wrong, the token economics for this coin are shit because they encourage price suppression early on so that the token burn contract is generating most of teh volume.

Thats bullish long term, means the investment will be more valuable in the end.

Stupid larp you just outed yourself as a lying pos on the other thread. Pretending to post as other people but you’re too stupid to use a vpn and too stupid to know how to wash trade

Go back to watching the playoffs lmao. This is the worst fudding of req so far since the ICO

Attached: REQd.png (1377x687, 1.15M)

>So the $100 will not be for a total supply of 1 billion but between 250 million and 500 million
Wait is this actually possible? When prices are low the burn rate per token is higher? I would be ok with price suppression then provided you don't discourage adoption with low price.

Its going to burst outta here any moment

Attached: Capture.jpg (1360x525, 76K)

looks like its bursting downwards. sorry lads - we gotta hold these bags a little longer