Is it really true that there are people who would prefer one world government over hundreds of nations? Why?

Is it really true that there are people who would prefer one world government over hundreds of nations? Why?

Attached: 1425772833664.png (400x389, 48K)

Because that way we're all unified.

The lines on that pepe are too thick.

Because the megacorps are pushing this 'borderless' agenda

Attached: 5445353.jpg (225x224, 6K)

We could actually achieve something then.

They're just leftists who are disconnected from the reality

yes because ultinationals have it easy wth many countries laws

I'm a citizen of the world :)

I want to slap you in your fucking face

Why wouldn't anyone want to be ruled by Greeks, Indians, Mexicans and Ethiopians?

Then we could finally achieve something.

Not a global government but the unification of the world, Eurasia with its capital in Nazareth is the future of mankind

We are citizens of the world.

What exactly? Genocides? Neo-feodalism?

Sure, why not?

umm sweetie, the only logical capital of the world is Amsterdam.

Because then you get retarded one size fits all policies.

Might have to do something about that language first, to be honest.

Why?

You mean we have to do something about the literacy of anglos.

What language are we using right now?

Countries with similar levels of wealth should merge with their neighbors.Makes things a lot simpler.

The lowest common denominator.

Therefore the most successful language and thus literacy is not an issue.

It already happens in a national context, wealthier states have to give money to poorer states out of "fairness" reasons, it also happens on a supranational basis like West Europeans giving "development monies" to East Europeans in the EU and if we had a world government it would be all the developed countries giving money to all the third world shitholes

We also have to give up freedoms to meet in the middle with European policies.
>the netherlands implements net neutrality onal a national level
>the dutch european commisioner im
plemented net neutrality in europe as well
>hold up, gotta appeal to the lobbyists
>suddenly a lot of privacy rules and traffic rules dony apply anymore

I think I accidentally clicked on the aussie

>if we had a world government it would be all the developed countries giving money to all the third world shitholes
Where is the issue with that? The developed countries are developed because they got rich primarily by exploiting the undeveloped nations.

Would you rather have the wealth of humanity controlled by a small handful of billionaires?

Is it really true that there are people who would prefer hundreds of slave based economy nations over thousands free and truly democratic nations? Why?

Attached: 1532566444455.jpg (666x527, 66K)

No, but I don't prefer 1 government for every 1 nation either

so that first worlders can work 1000 times harder to pull the third world up whilst being invaded by them

Curious how only first world globalist delusional degenerates want such a thing

*London

misdirected oxytocin focus

yes, communists want to see the borderless world where the government owns and redistributes the wealth