>That 39 year old boomer who pays shills to post about his shitcoin
That 39 year old boomer who pays shills to post about his shitcoin
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.is
twitter.com
blockstream.com
medium.com
github.com
reddit.com
web.archive.org
twitter.com
Seriously, fuck this guy and all his shady BS. All Bcash is good for is riding the pumps to increase your BTC stack. People who think bcash is going to take over are delusional.
stay mad corecuck
I'm Roger Ver, long time Bitcoin advocate and investor. Today I'm at the Mt. Gox World Headquarters in Tokyo, Japan. I had a nice chat with Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpeles about their current situation. He showed me multiple bank statements, as well as letters from banks and lawyers. I am sure that all the current withdrawal problems at Mt. Gox are being caused by the traditional banking system, not because of a lack of liquidity at Mt. Gox.
The traditional banking partners that Mt. Gox needs to work with are not able to keep up with the demands of the growing Bitcoin economy. The dozens of people who make up the Mt. Gox team are hard at work establishing additional banking partners that eventually will make dealing with Mt. Gox easier for all their customers around the world. For now, I hope everyone will continue working on Bitcoin projects that will help make the world a better place.
Jul 17, 2013
>Doesn't that durn Donald Drum-- I mean Roger Jihan CSW Ver just rustle your jimmies, fellow non-deplorable crypto enthusiasts? There's no way people like _this_ can win... r-right guys?
>Trying to somehow shoehorn the Gox collapse into an indictment of Bitcoin Cash.
I'm sure this narrative will start working for you guys any day now, corecuck.
>mfw 30yo boomer
>mfw i invested in the mtg cryptodream
>mfw RL cards are in a giant bullmarket rn
>mfw it never ends
>mfw i'm alrdy +500% in gainz since january
>feelsgoodman
Why didn't you invested in RL alrdy guys?
i also call literally everyone who disagrees with me corecuck
i find it's really a great way to get them to see the wisdom in my arguments.
>"Arguments"
were you not trying to make an argument?
I'm sure someone here would love to engage you in an argument, if you had one to offer.
Gas yourself.
ok pajeet, i guess english ins't your first language is it?
Reminder:
archive.is
Accusing your enemy of that which you are guilty
>archive.is
You'd have to be retarded to take what Adam said here literally.
Its obviously a metaphor. And its ironic you would accuse me of shilling (as the OP)
>Accusing your enemy of that which you are guilty
Right, you first.
kek
Lol how ironic that core CEO is ON RECORD saying he pays teams to "educate" people on segwit...
He isn't the CEO and he never said that. You're just another lying cunt.
To actually believe this you have to forget that Adam is a bumbling idiot who doesn't think before he comunicates (remember fucking tabs?)
Also:
twitter.com
>Co-Founder/CEO blockstream.com
>blockstream is core
>muh real bitcoin
>muh satoshis vision
>muh paid shills
Mmmm, delicious salt.
>Accuses obvious native speaker using colloquialisms of being streetshitter
>Can't even type properly
Pic related
corecucks BTFO
>making a memetic but factually inaccurate image to trick people.
Whatever you are racially, you're fucking trash.
Salty lying corecuck
>it is a metric, but I think that misses the bearer nature. run your own fullnode, keep your own keys, and the world can burn or go insane and you still have your bearer asset as sure as if it was a gold brick in a safe.
Top kek. I must have missed this one. Adam Back, ladies and gentlemen:
>"As long as you run a full node and keep your keys, you can contravene the miners."
FUCKING LOL
Pic related is Adam whenever he opens his mouth and talks about anything remotely outside his very narrow specialty.
Try to get a pull request that goes against Blockstreams vision merged into Bitcoin Core, never gonna happen, they're effectivally one and the same and you need some serious mental gymnastics not to see that.
51 non-core merges have already taken place this year.
>pull request that goes against Blockstreams vision
>51 non-core merges
Not even close to the point
Ahahahaha. You got an argument there, somewhere buddy?
>Pajeet
>Trash
>????
You realize that oozing salt and desperation is just hurting your cripplecoin, right?
Non-sequitur of the year right here, folks.
Oh? I missed the point when I totally wrecked your argument?
>folks
Who do you think is reading this thread? Its just us 3.
You're either a paid shill or you stole your carers phone again after you broke yours drooling on it.
>Nuh-uh I had up a deflection proof shield!
Woosh
>Dosn't even understand the 1, 10, 100% rule of message boards.
I love it when outsiders try and pretend that they are from here. Whoever is paying you to be here made a very bad investment.
BCASHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
How many of those 51 merges fly in the face of Blockstreams vision?
>I know every detail of this rock I live under
No BlockStream employees have commit/merge powers.
>How many of those 51 merges fly in the face of Blockstreams vision?
Ok first define their 'vision'
There is zero point in anyone taking part in the blocksize debate anymore. No one is changing their positions.
Pick your side, stick to it, and let's see who comes out on top.
>The chans are a rock full of evil trolls!
Spoken like a true newfag / shillfag.
Yeah, cause they all left or are not really employees, just "contractors."
>Attempt to access blockstream team page
>4 0 4 not found
Top kek.
Ok. I chose BTC the non-retarded version with all the adoption, and better security, and a larger base of compiled proof of work, and a higher price, and the original ticker, and virtually all the development, and almost a 10 year track record, and you get the picture...
Its more or less true that its worthless to argue about this anymore, but thats exactly what a shill who was trying to monopolize discourse would want/say. So fuck you, I will keep making these threads until BCH dies.
Sipa was still co-founder of Blockstream last I checked
github.com
Hey look I can throw biased conjecture around too
reddit.com
I'm not inventing the universe to show you a fucking apple pie.
>Attempt to access blockstream team page
>4 0 4 not found
Thank god for archives web.archive.org
>I'm not inventing the universe to show you a fucking apple pie
Translation: "I'm a lazy cunt, why can't people just take my side even when I am too lazy to defend it myself?"
>I will keep making these threads until BCH dies.
>But not until BTG or BCD dies. I don't care about those because they are not a threat to my fantasy of Bitcoin Core maximalism.
Really makes you think.
Also:
>all the adoption
"Yes, let's just ignore all the merchants and services that have dropped Bitcoin Core out of frustration."
My fucking sides.
your fucking sides what?
If it wasn't true there would of been no reason for Bitcoin XT, Classic or Unlimited to fork.
And this guy calls me pajeet.
Ya lost, kid. Go home.
except the obvious financial gain, covert asicboost, opportunity to destabilize the entire cryptoeconomy for financial gain, and lets be honest, a difference of opinion.
>And this guy calls me pajeet
actually I think you will find that I never did that.
>that feel when my sides reach orbit when an oldfag who lives under the Jow Forums rock cant recognize even the most basic of troll
I'm talking about legacy forks of Bitcoin Core for BTC, not the BCH fork sweetie. Are you sure it's not past your bedtime?
If the software has the same consensus rules its not a bitcoin fork, its a software fork, and if so who cares?
>Try to get a pull request that goes against Blockstreams vision merged into Bitcoin Core
>If it wasn't true there would of been no reason for Bitcoin XT, Classic or Unlimited to fork.
>If the software has the same consensus rules its not a bitcoin fork
>who cares?
People trying to get pulls that upset Blockstream merged
Such as?
>Let me just throw out a bunch of unsubstantiated word salad that has nothing to do with the discussion. Then, just to sweeten the deal, I'll imply that bitcoin is so weak that a few conspiratorial actors could easily hurt it, so I must defend cripplecoin on a shitty message board.
It's admirable that you're still trying to engage this guy, but it is clear that he is either clueless or doing the Dr. Back semantics shuffle to try and get out of the discussion in a cloud of confusion. Really is amazing how intellectually shameless some people are.
ahahaa you can make them till the end of time or until Blockstream stops paying you, rajeet.
The fact of the matter is Bitcoin (BCH) is not going away no matter how many spammy non-arguments you shit up the world with.
taste my garlic you vampires
Look at those delicious hubs and spokes. Decentralicious.
Some of us aren't paid to be here, we come and go, Sanjit.
1. pick a name you fucking cretin. For the record my name is Cole
2. I do this because I hate you, not because I get anything for it.
whoops, that one is out of date
>Total capacity: 30k USD
>TFW you have to make an on-chain transaction to your 100% up-time hot-wallet node to get paid for anything under 3 dollars, and you better hope that you don't sell more than 10,000 units.
This is rapidly turning from mildly amusing to just embarrassing. You have strayed way too far away from your Jow Forumsbitcoin hugbox, brainlet.
"Now with bigger hubs!"
>brand new protocol
>still has more nodes and transactions than BCH
"I AM LEGALLY BLIND"
Cole is a faggots name, not an indian name, pajesh
I do this because I enjoy triggering corecucks and also because I feel I need to counter the corecuck/paid shill propaganda originating from Blockstream.
If It has like 500 """hubs""" its not centralized
We should trade numbers so we can keep arguing later.
Top kek, I wonder if there is some kind of correlation between the distribution of matter in galactic clusters and node connections in the LN. Look at the big ole black hole at the center.
Only someone so deprived of any adverse ideas due to overexposure to pic related could think that posting this shit here is not making you look even more retarded, Apu.
You cant even read a force-graph, and you think I look stupid?
>Implying the way the graph is drawn has anything to do with the obvious degree of centralization
And another swing and a miss. You really don't realize what you're doing here, do you? If you did, you would have stopped a long time ago.
You need a mirror
>gets offended when called an Indian name, turns around and uses it in the same thread
>Still cant see on the graph that there is no significant centralization
>Claiming that I look stupid when really its at least both of us at this point.
>Making a huge deal out of these things
BTW not going to stop lol
>BTW not going to stop lol
Good. You are a true credit to your crusade!