Which logo would you choose?

Which logo would you choose?

Attached: 1506282515552.png (1650x472, 291K)

Either first or second

Please delete every file containing the 4th one its the ugliest piece of shit looks like it was made in 2001

1 or 2

1 imo

I'd go with 2. 1 is decent but kinda cliche. 2 stands out a bit more.

They are all sigils. what kind of shit are you trying to pull here op?

4. Its has a sleek retro look that's refreshing among all these new age minimalist shit logos

Fourth one is fucking depressing, delet.

Third will look shit on small print.

Second is the best because muh context

First looks like a personal brand, not something for an organization/corporation/company.

3rd is literally boy lovers symbol. 1 2 and 3 are all sigils, and 4 is just, a mess.

The 2rd

holy shit did a H1-B pajeet do the 4th one, what the fuck.

Two as...

1 is generic circa 2018
3 is generic circa 2014
4 is generic circa 1995

Attached: 1524478846119.jpg (1067x2193, 60K)

>he likes little boys

Please shhhhh about this. I can't get into the ICO

2 > 1 >>> 3
Four is an absolute piece of shit

Bump.

The Eden telegram is running dangerously low on Pajeets. QuarkChain is actually progressive. Everyone gets a full 0.2 eth contribution because of the 20,000 Indians who just joined.

Easy

Attached: ECB5C3F4-C195-4024-8F88-B5232D905E85.png (728x358, 31K)

2

because the word eden looks like a platform because there is a tree growing from it.. and the tree looks like it is blockchain.. you can tell what eden does just by looking at the logo

Remind me June 3rd

Attached: 31569B7F-9970-47E4-AABE-C99FE2530CD0.jpg (500x635, 122K)

Hahah yeah it looks like a 2001 windows logo

2 is too earthy with the blue and green colors -- makes me think it's some shitty farm to table start-up. 1 is better, but it's too edgy. 2 would be best if they got rid of the blue and went all green and grey.