>socialism
but what happens when you run out of other peoples money?
When will it collapse?
I'm not obsessed with luxuries, moron. Soviet ruling class were obessed with it. I'm talking about everyday goods. Before 1962, there weren't such thing as a toilet paper in USSR. Average family in USA lived in the whole big house, average family in USSR lived in commieblock appartament (60 square meters usually).
>rob the productive to "distribute" to the unproductive
>unproductive are still unproductive
>productive people get pissed off and leave the country or stop producing
>>>everyone starved
turbo lul
only people who complain about the market are those without marketable skills
you are not a priori entitled to the stuff you can not earn
socialists must be shot on sight
Other people will always have money ripe for the taking.
That's like the Mongols going "but what happens to our army when we've subjugated the Jin?"
You also weren't allowed to buy a PC in USSR. Only some elite schools had it during late 80's, but they was US-made lol.
The country was really good under Stalin and a few years after his unfortunate departure, but eh, a second USSR would fix all the fuck-ups done by Kruschev.
I myself want an anarchist society *here*. We already have all the advanced technology, the housing, the food production, so on and so forth. All we need to do is build the infrastructure as a community, make food and shelter available to all corners in the territory, and set an example for citizens of other first world nations to do the same.
Anyway, I can’t continue the discussion, argue with someone else. Byeee.
>You also weren't allowed to buy a PC in USSR
How many househoulds actually had PCs in the 80's in the USA though?
No vodka and balalaika in pic?