Be American

>Siddhartha Rathod

How would you feel about your family being represented in court by a poo in loo?

these new european cultural traditions sure are interesting

>call the police at some rich person's house, tell them it's being robbed
>hide in the bushes
>police arrive and proceed to shoot the homeowners
>wait for them to leave and then loot the house

Indians have the same socioeconomic profile as Jews in the US. It's fairly standard in America to interact with Indian American professionals in medicine or law.

I can understan if the call was "there's a man in my home trying di drown my grandson" but he was already dead kek

something like that shit actually happened, some guy sent police to the house of a guy he was beefing with on a false tip and they just went and shot him dead

Honest question, not necessarily related to this case, but how difficult would it be to manufacture weaponry that is not lethal? Thinking along the line of a stun gun but without the disadvantage of distance.

there are less lethal projectile weapons eg rubber bullets and tear gas grenades but the issue is all of them can kill under certain circumstances

Yes, what about some kind of low-caliber or rubber bullet with some kind of chemical that paralyzes people? Am I crazy or would this be possible with research and funding?

It actually surprises me that such options are not considered.

any compound used as a tranquilizer can become a lethal poison if administered in an inappropriate quantity

this but unironically

so basically what you're omitting is that the only reason tranquilizers wouldn't work in America, because your trigger happy cops literally cannot stop shooting things, until the mag is emptied out

Dumbass probably pointed his gun at the cops
This is why you need a holster
Cops did nothing wrong in the situation, anyone else would've done the same and they would've been right

this but unironically

no my concern is that it's very difficult to dose someone properly when you're doing it from behind the sights of an air rifle:

>Tranquillizer darts are not generally included in military or police less-than-lethal arsenals because no drug is yet known that would be quickly and reliably effective on humans without the risks of side effects or an overdose. This means that effective use requires an estimate of the weight of the target to be able to determine how many darts (if any) can be used. Shooting too few would result in partial effects only, while too many can kill the target. According to James Butts, former Chief of Police of Santa Monica, "Tranquilizing agents don't affect everyone uniformly. Therefore you cannot predict whether or not you have a sufficient dose to tranquilize the individual. Second, any tranquillizer will take time to enter the bloodstream and sedate the individual. If someone is advancing on you with a deadly weapon or a threatening object, there's no way a tranquillizer would take effect in the two to three seconds it would take someone to seriously injure you."[6]

Sure, but I think that a chemical that allows you to instantly paralyze someone is preferable to being shot in the head and instantly dying.

There would still be deaths but less lethal force would be required. I don't know if such a chemical exists that would allow for this but I'm skeptical that this isn't being researched as an alternative to traditional bullets.

ive done that before, works like a charm

this, my doctor is indian and so is my boss's boss

what a headline

>James Butts

Attached: frog.jpg (640x633, 61K)

wow, I saw this on reddit too

do you search reddit for shit to post here?

reminds me of these.

Attached: american news.jpg (2674x2798, 2.03M)

It's no secret here that police are pretty retarded, which is why I scratch my head when people say only the police should have guns here.
Stun guns are still lethal but can also be stopped by heavy clothing, and of course there's also distance.
Tranquilizers are very specifically assigned dosages based on the vitals of the person getting tranquilized, and rubber bullets just hurt a lot and would probably piss the guy off even more, and forget doing anything if it's a druggie. As far as some magic tranquilizing drug with little adverse side effects, that just doesn't exist outside of vidya and movies.
The problem is that police here are all trigger happy retards and departments all across the country are corrupt as shit. Obviously not every LEO is a jackass but too many are, and funnily enough they get very little training and actual time on the range for guns. Your average fudd gets more range time with his durr rifle than your average cop here.

Can't the same argument be used against standard bullets? Isn't a bullet more effective against a low weight individual compared to a fat one? Hence why one bullet is usually not enough to stop a big individual from advancing. Can police judge effectively how many bullets is required to kill an individual as opposed to just stopping him?

No drug yet being known seem to me to be a problem of research and administration of the drug rather than a set in stone argument as to why such research should not at least be funded.

american cops will be replaced by robots soon, feel free to quote me around 2030 or so

Mistakes happen idiots. Go ahead and show me a fool proof way of avoiding this situation where the robber is still stopped.

>avoiding this situation where the robber is still stopped
>this
In this situation he was dead already

Stupid fucktard cops

> Hey you put your hands up!
> *waits 5 seconds before mag dumping to see if he puts his hands up*
wow so hard

Attached: 1532811382250.jpg (1280x847, 260K)

>Be American
>Pay taxes
>Most of your money literally gets blown up overseas
>What little is left over goes to things like emergency services
>Call them for help
>They make things infinitely worse
That'll be $10, 000 plus tip and now the cop will go on paid """"leave"""" (vacation)

BUT WAIT THERE'S MORE!

>I need muh guns and muh sekund amenderment so I can protect muhself from da gubbermint!
>Calls government
>gets murdered
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Attached: 1343662563949.gif (332x215, 1.99M)

That happened with swatting in my town

someone can be hit with one bullet to the leg and it can sever an artery and kill them
on the other hand someone can be hit with 10+ bullets center mass and survive with little to no long-term damage because they don't hit anything important
I don't know what point you're trying to make here except that you know very little about human anatomy

>Dude sometimes murder is just a mistake bro
>Why yes, I am proud to pay taxes so the government can murder me.

Attached: 02b.jpg (680x365, 31K)

>it is illegal to collect water
Does this mean rain barrels are illegal? Surely this only affects Oregon.

#bluelivesmatter

The point is the unpredictability of regular bullets and aim is just as unpredictable as the reactions to a chemical as described in the post.

I don't know how that wasn't clear or what it has to do with knowledge of human anatomy, your examples just serves to prove my point lol

yes, which is why police officers in America use live ammunition exclusively as lethal force and don't use tranquilizers at all
so your point being ????