How can we overcome identity politics?

>Israel and India have their own cultures
really made me think

>slavic latin
what

>Isreal
Typical Asiatic country no different from Syria and Lebanon outside of the fact that it's wealthier and more modern. Still totally belongs lumped with them though, much like Japan is lumped with China and North Korea
>India
Is totally a distinct culture.

>my city specifically is slavic-latin
See guys? I keep telling you Baja California should be independent.

I feel you, another shithole map that puts Austria and germany in the same category, yet we share nothing but a language which is questionable in itself since germans don't understand us when speaking

Attached: 1501367587910.jpg (640x480, 31K)

What is this? Why is it lumping cultures together in a seemingly arbitrary way? Did they atleast reaserch such countries?

same as las republica del rio grande

wtf is this map? Why is Seattle and Vancouver on par with Iqaluit

Attached: 1529361566783.jpg (532x800, 98K)

>Newfoundland is uninhabited

Lol so you point out "catalan" and "galician" cultures and pick the same colour for Castilian and Lombard for example
>The absolutely retarded map

A number of things
There is no such thing as "Pakistani culture". The western (Pashtun/Baloch) parts of Pakistan are part of Iranic culture and the rest is mostly Punjabis and Sindhis which would be Indic culture.
Bangladesh is entirely Indic culture.
"Buddhist culture" does not exist.Thailand/Vietnam/Laos/etc are more similar to Indonesia/Malaysia than fucking Mongolia. Sri Lanka is also entriely Indic culture.

>Culture in Lisbon is the same as the culture in Vladivostok

I'm down with this OP.

Nice trips Wong.

die

What is that horrible looking Orange creature in South America?

>it shows 16 cultures, I think it makes sense
It really doesn't.

have less and less of a clue what the fuck this represents the longer I stare at it
darkish Red COULD mean either Protestant or Germanic language but then it doesn't fit in several places for either
what the fuck is this

>commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World_Map_of_16_cultures_for_"Cultural_Mandala".svg
>World Map that relates cultural traits to the four elements of antiquity (Earth, Water, Fire and Air), and then distributes cultures according to the two elements that have been perceived by the author as the most predominant ones for that culture. This brings up a total of 16 combinations. The map should not be taken litetraly and it still requires a lot of improvement. It has no other purpose than to create a cultural mandala where all humanity can be represented. Therefore, it has no political purpose at all and should never be perceived as a political map of the World.

I'm even more confused now

>Khosian, Abo and Pacific culture
Yeah, you can't really group these together. Central Australia is absolutely fucking nothing like the islands in the Pacific and their cultures are worlds apart because of this.

>World Map that relates cultural traits to the four elements of antiquity (Earth, Water, Fire and Air), and then distributes cultures according to the two elements that have been perceived by the author as the most predominant ones for that culture.
Seems legit.

Attached: 1383489130348.jpg (520x750, 47K)

>germanic culture
>Latin - Slavic culture

Let's not be hypocrites,this isn't what the map shows at all

Identity politics is a joke. Thinking culture and civilization should be artificially kept frozen in time is just an idea brainlets think is possible.

Look at the world and realize that globalism is the natural progression of what the British Empire started and you will see a world that is slowly accepting a standard of civilization set by the Anglo-Saxons.

What is the language of business? How do officials in post countries dress? How did the whole world adapt the British idea of constitution and law? If you want to be blind and ignore this and think there is any culture on earth that has not been influenced by the first global empire you are delusional.

Even if you disagree with my message of globalism, read some Benoist (an identitarian) and you will see that race, culture and civilization has never and never will be as narrowly defined as nationalists want to believe.

Based and redpilled. Unironically.

Most of those categories are completely inadequate.

We've been on a long march of homogenisation since being hunter-gatherers. Ethnicities and languages would've been like splotches of gradients across the world, when we lived in bands. And present-day countries are not reflective of historical nationalities and ethnicities, at all. People often hearken back even just a few centuries, calling people then by the present-day manufactured nationality. As though they have ethnic kinship, taking the many peoples and complexities and placing them in their trite nationality. This now extends to race, they encapsulate so much within a few meaningless categories. Parading the category as their identity. I do not like this homogenisation or this empty identity, but it is what it is.