I would say the Eternal Anglo and the allies committed war crimes. Why weren't they tried for it?
I would say the Eternal Anglo and the allies committed war crimes. Why weren't they tried for it?
cause we won against the hun
Aussies are an evolved form of the Anglo and therefore, free of guilt.
"I ask you: do you want total war?"
en.wikipedia.org
because they won u faggot
Killing Nazis is not a crime
iirc, from a legal standpoint, the strategic bombing campaigns during WW2 weren't illegal as long as the targets were at least nominally defended. Deliberately targeting civilians only became illegal after WW2 afaik.
>Why weren't they tried for it?
because they won, duh
>Although Goebbels claimed that the audience included people from "all classes and occupations" (including "soldiers, doctors, scientists, artists, engineers and architects, teachers, white collars"), the propagandist had carefully selected his listeners to react with appropriate fanaticism. Goebbels said to Albert Speer that it was the best-trained audience one could find in Germany. Despite this, the enthusiastic and unified crowd response recorded in the written version is, at times, not fully supported by the recording.[1]
en.wikipedia.org
Germans supported nazis till the end.
youtube.com
>war-phony peace-war-phony peace-war-phony peace
I suspect you're that one user constantly writing everything bad about Germans, and you're apparently not willing to consider the reasons why that was the case, so yeah... go post your Barbarians.jpg now or something
My mother is volga-german from Samara, my father is Estonian-Russian with an amount of jewish blood
so what?
I have reasons you know
Hironeeto and friends committed war crimes. Why weren't they tried for it?
you're fucked in the head
They won tho. Vae victis
lmao
what?
seems to me you're saying you have problems with your mother and dealing with this by hating on Germans on Jow Forums 24/7
"lmao" all you want, I'd think about it if I were you
Why didn't Americans get charged with war crimes in Vietnam?
They killed over 2 MILLION civvies AND they lost
no i love you, you get all wrong
Vietnamese neither defeated their army entirely nor occupied their homeland entirely
If they did, you can be sure as fuck heads would've rolled
The NVA occupied the entirety of Vietnam by '75
You don't get to be tried for collateral damage.
I'm talking about the US
WW2 and Vietnam aren't comparable in the slightest in that regard
Dresden was collateral
when will Anglos and Russians pay for their betrayals?
it wasn't collateral damage:
>The purpose of the area bombardment of cities was laid out in a British Air Staff paper, dated 23 September 1941:
> The ultimate aim of an attack on a town area is to break the morale of the population which occupies it. To ensure this, we must achieve two things: first, we must make the town physically uninhabitable and, secondly, we must make the people conscious of constant personal danger. The immediate aim, is therefore, twofold, namely, to produce (i) destruction and (ii) fear of death.[155]
en.wikipedia.org
When you finish cleaning my damn toilet bartek
Kraut propaganda
revenge for coventry
betrayal? you wouldn't exist or if you were very lucky you'd be a slave in siberia if generalplan ost was implemented. you should know your place and thank god that the soviets only wanted to implement communism on you.
It's only a warcrime if you lose the war.
Talk shit, get hit.
>bombing g*rmany
>war crime
pick one
the only crime they committed was not finishing off the g*rms once and for all when they had the chance