Don't mind me, just testing if Jow Forums allows us to type pic related, the 28th letter of our alphabet...

Don't mind me, just testing if Jow Forums allows us to type pic related, the 28th letter of our alphabet, on this international board where speaking in foreign languages is encouraged. Who in their right mind would put on a filter that converts them to O and o respectively, right?

Anyway, here I go:
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
ooooooooooooooooo

Attached: ﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽� (700x450, 41K)

Oh...

Sooo. What's the difference?

>Who in their right mind would put on a filter that converts them to O and o respectively

Attached: 1493844345034.png (420x420, 13K)

oO

Öööööööööö

>you werent joking

WHO LIVES IN A PINEAPPLE UNDER THE SEA?

based, diacritics are disgusting n*Rdoid invention because they were too retarded to make their own alphabet

MODED

O btfo

>our language
no

Norway BTFO

Attached: c.png (315x140, 3K)

Wrong. Diacritics convey meaningful information about the sound the character in question represent. Furthermore, it allows for more efficient spelling, which is plain to see when comparing a Dutch text to an equivalent [in meaning] Scandinavian one.

Dont start it

Kara boga

>it actually converts it

>
wtf is this

>O with line
plebs!

Attached: HOLD UP.jpg (630x940, 92K)

O

Just use a låtïñ ãlphåbët rëtärds

Ǿ

>I have been provided with sufficient evidence of the results of the experiment by the other boards users, however I will discredit those posts and conduct my own experiment

O

>his language needs diacritics

howling at yöu

o

>not just using Ö like regular people

OOoOOOOOOOOOOOOO

ǿǾǾǿǿǾǾǿǿǾǾǿǿǾǾǿ

Attached: waluigi spinning.gif (500x281, 368K)

SOren Kierkegaard

¿Whȳ whõùld thęý dö thąt?

which does Jow Forums prefer? the swedish umlaut o or the norwegian/danish strikethrough o?

The latter desu

O

Does this appear as a dick to anyone else?
𓂸

Haha

ōœóõòôoö

𓂸
𓂸
𓂸

Well tested, now someone explain why this character isn't allowed on this website.