Has Croatia and other homogeneous countries realized the potential of immigration?

>You need to invest in recruiting foreign talent.
What the fuck are we supposed to invest? It's hard enough to keep our own talent here.
The place of the periphery within the capitalist system is the production of human capital. It is even more important than the exploitation of cheap labour and resources.

Based and redpilled

fuck off nigger

Did you even watch the game? Croatia dominated and France only won thanks to refball.

>multicultural countries dominate in sports,
yes
>finance,
no
>science,
no
>technology,
fuck no
>etc.
yes like crime and bad music
>because they have free market systems
no
>based on getting the best of the best from all over the world.
ahaha

The US is number one is producing scientific and technological achievements. Don't try to bullshit this.

Stop trying to make excuses. The ref was fair.

Attached: received_1353368864795638.png (960x1435, 1.38M)

the US isn't only "a multicultural country", it's the US, that comes with a lot of history and reasons why it is what it is
anyways why would anyone believe what you have to say about how to run countries that aren't yours ? last time you did that you brought freedom in the middle east and it killed millions, now you want to do the same thing in europe

Wow you're dumb. We already brought freedom to Europe. How do you think Nazi Germany was defeated?

And as far as the tech industry goes, it is full of immigrants, including Africans like Elon Musk.

ok you're just trolling now, fuck off

no thanks to negroes

and it's letting it so many incompetent mexicans that china will take its spot

>ok you're just trolling now, fuck off

How am I trolling? You'd be speaking German today if it weren't for America.

>and it's letting it so many incompetent mexicans that china will take its spot

Never. China only steals technology from the West. They can't even build an aircraft carrier on their own without Russian help.

usa can't even build a wall on its own without mexican help

Multiculturalism leads always to the lack of cohesion, violence and fall of the country. Just look at history, the most multiracial countries in the world are usually the most violent, look to south africa or brazil.
And if you are talking about sports, look to the last 16years football world champions, all were white europeans, Spain, Italy, (both completly white teams) Germany (only some few 3 non europeans).

About finance and tecnology, a world without europeans you would never have had any of that.

And they say we can’t into bantz.

Attached: 8847B41C-9668-494B-85B0-15F4A299038D.png (1024x576, 761K)

>4-2 with a free goal given by our goalkeeper
really fucking close lmao kys macaco

wh*Toids got curbstomped

The white wives of the French soccer team.

Attached: wives_of_french_soccer_team.jpg (540x508, 141K)

>look to south africa or brazil.

You're ignoring the historical context of those two countries which is full of reasons why they're so crime-ridden.

And also, for you own convenience, you ignored all the prosperous multicultural countries like Canada, the US, the UK, Germany, France, etc.

It's just a simple fact that the majority of poor countries in the world are homogeneous.

It's funny to say that when you also ignore the historical context of why Canada, the US, the UK, Germany, France are prosperous. These countries were already extremely prosperous before mass non-European immigration. And they have only been declining since it started, only a few decades ago.

>africa
>homogenous
FOUND THE RETARD

>And also, for you own convenience, you ignored all the prosperous multicultural countries like Canada, the US, the UK, Germany, France, etc.

It was not the recent multiculturalism that visited germany, or france and even canada, that made them prosperous and everybody knows that, it was the european cohesion.

You say "multicultural" when what you really mean is "multiracial", use the right words at least

That's just nonsense. Germany has never enjoyed more prosperity than under the governance of Chancellor Merkel.

The United States and Canada would never have become such prosperous economic powerhouses without all the immigration.

The UK has always benefited from immigration both economically and culturally. The famous fish and chips meal, which is often thought of as an Anglo-Saxon dish, was actually invented by Jewish immigrants.

>That's just nonsense. Germany has never enjoyed more prosperity than under the governance of Chancellor Merkel.
Because your measure of a country's success is the quality of life of it's inhabitants ? With this logic, some islands in Polynesia have probably been superpowers for millennia, except nobody noticed.
As far as global relevance, national cohesion, and long term perspective goes, Germany is not in a good place compared to what it used to be. And all those latter criteria are necessary to the sustainability of that quality of life.

Besides you don't seem to make a distinction between the welfare of German people as an established ethnic-based group and the welfare of the German state, which is just an institution which does not represent it's people.

>The United States and Canada would never have become such prosperous economic powerhouses without all the immigration.
Surely you mean without colonization ? You don't get to say it was a good thing for the sake of this one argument and then go back to pretending to care about native Americans the rest of the time.

>The UK has always benefited from immigration both economically and culturally. The famous fish and chips meal, which is often thought of as an Anglo-Saxon dish, was actually invented by Jewish immigrants.
And today Jews are emigrating away from Europe because of what it's turning into. And Jews never tried to impose Judaism on England by force of arms.
Not all immigration is equal, neither in quality or in purpose.

And the argument of authority that "it has always benefited so far" is fallacious, with this logic your country would never have abolished slavery for example.

>Lemar
>Nigeria
really shows how this pic is acurate lmao

>rich people marry rich people

wow what a surprise

*if it weren't for USSR
fixed

Please kill yourself. Just because blacks can do sports doesnt mean they can do civilization

they adapt to civilization by running away from the police, hence why they are good at sports

Why so edgy meixanon?

>it was the european cohesion.

Nigga what? there was no cohesion or PAn-European identity. Europeans have fucked each other so hard for centuries.

don't explain something you don't understand

yes and No. It isn't yet it is beaus non-Africans they don't give a shit whether African is homogeneous or not asides from a race angle in most places.

>Just look at history, the most multiracial countries in the world are usually the most violent, look to south africa or brazil.

South Africa and Brazil have huge violence due to extremely shitty polices in their early years in regards to city and inequality.

the eternal leaf

>*if it weren't for USSR
>fixed

The Soviet military was built by US investment. So yes, even on the eastern front, that was America's doing.